NEWS
PB February-March 2026
February-March 2026 11
Village refuses to ‘return’ bank
statements and tells Bus Éireann
it is abusing court process
The bank statements prove that, contrary to reports given to the Dáil
by Ministers and their lawyers, millions of euro provided annually by the
Department of Education were illegally used for general costs by Bus Éireann
T
he controversy over the finances
of the School Transport Scheme
has taken a dramatic turn following
a court action by Bus Éireann to
prevent the further circulation of
information recently published in Village. In
October last, we explained how Bus Éireann
and the Department of Education, which
provides the finance for the school transport
service, have for years wrongly claimed that
any surplus funds derived from the subvention
were ‘ring-fenced’ and not used for any other
purpose.
Documents obtained by Village showed that,
in fact, millions of euro provided annually by the
Department were co-mingled in the Bus Éireann
accounts and used for general payment of costs
and expenses by the company.
Copies of the bank statements for the
years 2012-2018 contradicted assurances
made by lawyers acting for the company and
the Department that were provided to the
Supreme Court, the High Court, the Public
Accounts Committee (PAC) and in dozens
of replies to parliamentary questions since
2012. Successive ministers up to recently have
asserted in the Dáil, in written responses to
parliamentary questions, that any surplus
deriving from the funds provided for the school
transport service are held in reserve and are
‘ring-fenced’ from the general expenditure by
Bus Éireann.
In June 2025, the relevant Bus Éireann
statements were obtained following an order
by the County Registrar in Galway directing
Bank of Ireland to produce a defined set of
accounts relating to Bus Éireann’s operation
of its school transport services. The school
transport schemes cost the State over €380
million in 2023 (€3.2 billion since 2012).
The statements were provided to Tim Doyle,
a director of School Transport Scheme Ltd. (STS
Ltd.) who sought the information in order to
establish whether the repeated assertions by
the company that the monies were managed
on a strict ‘cost recovery’ basis, were true.
As well as a possible breach of EU state aid
rules, the banking transactions “completely
and irrefutably contradict claims made by the
state about Bus Éireann’s handling of funds
from school transport”, Doyle told Village
magazine late last year.
Following the publication of this damaging
information, lawyers for Bus Éireann, rather
than taking steps to correct the court and other
records, challenged the decision of the county
registrar to order the release of the company’s
bank statements.
Although details of the statements had
already been published in Village and provided
to other media outlets, a Circuit Court judge in
Galway found in November 2025 that the County
Registrar did not have jurisdiction to release the
Connolly_Bus.indd 11Connolly_Bus.indd 11 03/02/2026 08:3303/02/2026 08:33
12 February-March 2026
February-March 2026 PB
Copies of bank accounts
2012- 2018 contradicted
assurances made by lawyers
acting for Bus Éireann
bank statements and made restraining orders
against Doyle in relation to them.
On the basis of this ruling, Byrne Wallace
Shields LLP, solicitors for Bus Éireann, wrote to
various media outlets in late November seeking
the return, or destruction, of any documents
they had pertaining to the statements of the
transport company. In a letter to Village, the
firm wrote that “It is apparent from reports
published in your publication and/or media
enquiries made by you to our client that Mr
Doyle and/or agents/advisors acting on his
behalf may have shared copies of the bank
statements with you. In accordance with the
terms of the Order of 11 November 2025, there
is no lawful basis for Mr Doyle to possess our
client’s bank statements, or to share same
with any party”.
It continued: “We require an immediate
response from you, and in any event by 5pm,
on Thursday 27 November 2025, that you
will forthwith: Deliver to us all hard copies
of the bank statements and any portable
devices (USB, hard drive etc.) containing the
bank statements to us, with any applicable
passwords, by immediate return”. It also
sought an undertaking from Village that the
contents of the bank statements “will not
be shared or published by you in any form
or otherwise it would seek a court order and
costs”.
In response, the editor of Village pointed
out that the magazine “was not named or
aected in any way whatsoever by the Circuit
Court order”.
He said: “that the tone, content, and
implied purpose of your correspondence raise
serious concerns as to whether Bus Éireann -
a wholly State-owned company - and its legal
representatives are attempting to use court
process, or the appearance of court process,
as a tool of ocial intimidation and prior
restraint against a media organisation.
Accordingly, we hereby put you on notice
that: Any further attempt to rely on the 11
November order as if it applies to Village will
be treated as an abuse of process; that any
attempt to restrict Village’s reporting, obtain
journalistic material, or interfere with source
protection without a court order specifically
addressed to Village will constitute a
disproportionate interference with our rights
under Article 10 ECHR and Article 40.6.1 of the
Constitution; and should Bus Éireann or Byrne
Wallace escalate this matter, we will consider
immediate applications to the High Court,
including: a declaratory order that the Circuit
Court order does not bind Village; injunctive
relief restraining Bus Éireann and its agents
from misusing court orders to chill or impede
journalistic activity; damages and costs
arising from abuse of process and unlawful
interference with constitutionally protected
journalistic privilege”.
To date there has been no response from
Byrne Wallace Shields.
Tim Doyle informed Village that he and his
company have complied with the Circuit Court
order but questioned why the company sought
to suppress information that is already in the
public domain and whether the judge was fully
informed of its motivation before making his
decision to overturn the ruling of the County
Registrar. He said that he understood that
other media to whom he provided details of
the Bus Éireann bank statements had actually
complied with the letter after receiving similar
threats of legal proceedings from the solicitors
acting for the company.
However, he insisted that the strategy of Bus
Éireann cannot prevent him from exposing the
misleading statements made by the company
and the Department of Education about the
finances of the school transport service for
over a decade.
“The Court did not decide whether the
accounts were accurate; whether the school
transport services was genuinely cost recovery;
whether public bodies had been misinformed;
whether prior ocial certifications were
reliable. The accounts were ordered to be
returned. This may be legally neat but it is
substantively hollow”, Doyle told Village.
“The Department of Education and the State
was a notice party to the Bus Éireann appeal
but their representatives abandoned any
obligation to correct the record or to explain to
the Circuit Court what the evidence contained
in the bank account statements actually
entailed”, he said.
At a hearing on 1 December 2025, before the
Legal Costs Adjudicator who is assessing the
costs arising from a High Court case in 2012
and subsequent Supreme Court proceedings
brought by STS Ltd against Bus Éireann and
the Department, lawyers for the State oered
a new explanation as to how the funds were
handled by the company.
Eileen Barrington SC, for the Department,
asserted at the hearing that it was “never
claimed”that Bus Éireann operated separate
bank accounts for the school transport funds.
Notwithstanding that no-one ever suggested
that the company operated separate bank
accounts for the funds, her statement appears
to represent a shift in the Department’s
narrative over so many years. It also seems
to undermine the assurance given by Ms
Barrington for the Department in the High
Court in 2012, in which she stated that the
school transport funds provided to Bus
Éireann were on a cost-recovery basis and all
school transport activity was “hermetically
sealed” from the commercial operations of the
company.
According to Doyle: “This implies that the
funds were co-mingled and mixed into Bus
Éireann’s general cash flow and working
capital. If so, it gave undisclosed and unlawful
economic benefit to the commercial activities
of the company. This is a major breach of EU
law concerning government subventions
to commercial semi-state companies
which is intended to avoid the distortion of
competition”.
This may be of interest to Seán Canney, the
current Minister of State in the Department
of Transport who, when in opposition, asked
the Government about the use of the surplus
arising from the school transport funding.
In early 2024, Deputy Canney asked then
Minister for Education, Norma Foley, for: “the
euro amounts of net surplus cash derived
from school transport by Bus Éireann that
the auditors and directors categorised in the
accounts as profit in the profit and loss balance
sheet and cash flow statement for each of the
years 2005 to 2015, in tabular form”.
In February 2024, the Minister replied that:
“the Department reimburses Bus Éireann for
a range of costs incurred in the operation and
administration of the scheme. Re-imbursement
to Bus Éireann is on a cost recovery basis”.
The Minister continued: “The Comptroller
and Auditor General (C&AG) carried out
an examination of the provision of school
transport and completed its report in August
2017. The C&AG report referenced a surplus
in the Transport Management Charge element
of the costs. This amount was held by way
of an uncommitted reserve by Bus Éireann
to be used solely for the purposes of the
School Transport Scheme. The balance on
the uncommitted reserve of €6.7 million was
repaid fully to the Department in December
2018”.
This saga is beginning to expose much more
than an accounting dispute. This is a systemic
failure of democratic accountability. For more
than a decade, because of the lack of oversight,
a State-owned company (financed by huge
public monies and advised by department
ocials), public auditors and barristers have
failed to correct a false narrative that insulated
the school transport service from regulation,
scrutiny and competition.
Connolly_Bus.indd 12Connolly_Bus.indd 12 03/02/2026 08:3303/02/2026 08:33
