
66 February-March 2026
“The wine of life is spilt upon the sand,/My
heart is as some famine-murdered land”.
This intergenerational continuity reinforces
Brown’s underlying point: the Famine’s
literary aftermath was not confined to the
1840s but extended deep into the national
imagination.
‘The Living Skeleton: Irish Famine Poems’
also challenges the revisionist narratives
advanced by FSL Lyons, Roy Foster, Robin
Haines and Maurice Craig, all of whom
sought to frame the Famine within the limits
of economic theory, administrative debate
or dispassionate historiography. Brown’s
anthology asserts a counter-case: that poetry
constituted a contemporaneous moral record,
one that exposes the emotional and physical
devastation in ways ocial documentation
cannot. In her reading, the poets stand as a
corrective, not as supplementary material.
Her selection stretches from Ethna
Carberry and Samuel Ferguson to Alfred
Perceval Graves, Emily Lawless, Mangan,
Rosa Mulholland and Dora Sigerson Shorter.
It spans late-eighteenth-century voices and
those born in the aftermath of the 1840s,
giving the anthology a wide temporal frame
but a coherent emotional register.
The work is not retrospective; it is
immediate. Keegan Casey’s ‘Charley Mr
O’Donahue’ oers a stark account of eviction:
“Where is the white house on the hill?/’T
was levelled to the ground/By evil law and
ruthless hands,/And bayonets flashing
round…”.
Such lines function as reportage. Casey
later re-emerged through Augusta Gregory,
who used his ballad ‘The Rising of the Moon’
(1907) as the title for her nationalist play.
Fanny Parnell, sister of Charles Stewart
Parnell, also appears as a passionately
political voice. Her ‘What Shall We Weep For?’
turns Queen Victoria into an apocalyptic
emblem: “For the Scarlet Woman that’s
drunken with the blood and tears of her
slaves”. The technical craft may be uneven
but the emotional intensity is not.
Brown also attends to the oral
transmission of Famine memory. She notes
that grandparents passed down stories
heard in childhood, preserving visceral
accounts long before state curricula or
academic monographs existed. This living
memory formed a collective consciousness
that helped re-energise Irish cultural identity.
Brown herself shares geographic roots
with Frances Elizabeth Browne of Donegal,
one of the poets included, linking editor
and subject through location and inherited
experience.
The anthology embraces Emily Henrietta
Hickey’s ‘The Ballad of Lady Ellen’, which
addresses souperism; Aubrey de Vere’s
‘Year of Sorrow—Ireland—1849’, with its
admonition “Behold, O People! thou shalt
die!”; Ethna Carbery’s ‘The Passing of
the Gael’ alongside ‘Mo Chraoibhín Cno’;
Thomas D’Arcy McGee’s accusatory ‘The
Famine in the Land’ and the more furious
‘A Malediction’; and William Drennan’s
lament ‘The Wake of William Orr’, with its cry:
“Epochs marked by blood and tears!”. These
works map a poetic geography of suering,
protest, exile and political analysis.
Brown is sceptical of historians who dwell
on administrative debates involving Robert
Peel, John Russell, George Grey and William
à Court. Their correspondence, statistics
and policy memoranda fall short of what
poets captured in the moment. She focuses
instead on Charles Trevelyan, the Treasury
ocial whose attitudes and decisions
remain central to Famine historiography.
Trevelyan’s voice echoes through Pete St
John’s modern ballad ‘The Fields of Athenry’.
His Morning Chronicle writings and his book
‘The Irish Crisis’ characterised the Famine
as “sent by providence”. His tour of Ireland
left him appalled: he complained that “the
Natives” were excitable, that priests lent
repeal a religious aura and that peasants
laboured under “the delusion that they are
a nation”. His paranoia, expressed in the
warning that if the Irish rose “my life would
not be worth a bad pound note”, reveals the
anxiety beneath ocial policy.
Tim Pat Coogan’s ‘The Famine Plot:
England’s Role in Ireland’s Greatest
Tragedy’ serves up demographic precision:
a population of over eight million falling
to roughly half between 1841 and 1851.
The Times editorial of 22 September 1846
applauded Poor Law relief and called the
blight a “blessing”. Coogan counters that
Ireland had plenty of food; people simply
lacked the money to buy it. James Donnelly
argued that banning oat exports would
have averted the catastrophe entirely. The
indictment is clear: the Famine was not only
natural but political.
Westminster’s prejudices long predated
1847. Benjamin Disraeli declared the Irish
“wild, reckless, indolent, uncertain and
superstitious”. Parliament debated the Corn
Laws while Ireland starved. Yet Trevelyan was
knighted in 1848 for his famine-relief work.
Echoing this, Bob Geldof was knighted in
1986 for Live Aid, an event he later linked
explicitly to the memory of Skibbereen and
the Irish Famine. The continuity lies in the
role of song: Live Aid’s anthems carried
emotional weight just as the Famine ballads
once did. Trevelyan was unnerved by the
communal power of Irish music, which he
regarded as a threat because it fostered
solidarity.
Satire also flourished. Edward Forbes
lampooned ocialdom in ‘The Potato
Commission’, mocking bureaucratic jargon
and pseudo-scientific authority: “As for
Solanum Tuberosum,/It’s a very bad job
for them as grows ’em”. Brown includes
such pieces to show the breadth of poetic
response: lyric, lament, protest, and ridicule.
Brown values content over polish. The
work of her 79 contributors, along with
anonymous ballads and broadsides, forms
a distinct Famine-genre: stark, emotionally
charged, realistic and lyrical. ‘The Living
Skeleton: Irish Famine Poems’ resonates
with what she calls “voices of the voiceless”,
oering unfiltered expression from before,
during and after the catastrophe. The result is
a mosaic of poetic testimony that challenges
ocial narratives and reasserts the authority
of the people’s experience.
Kevin Kiely has a PhD in the Patronage of
Modernist Poetry. His recent publications
include ‘The Principles of Poetry DI + ID = Ψ
Psi’ (Spa Cottage Publishing).
‘The Living
Skeleton: Irish
Famine Poems’
features poets as
a corrective, not
as supplementary
material
Kiely_Review.indd 66Kiely_Review.indd 66 03/02/2026 08:3003/02/2026 08:30