Villager
late, at pm on a Friday, just when any sensi-
ble journalist would be downing his second
Erdinger. It was worth it though, showing
€, in VIP world travel for Harney, ex-
IBEC-head and health-privatiser husband,
Brian Geoghegan, and their lucky, none-too-
frugal entourages.
Obama, Climate
and the abandonment
of radicalism
After nearly a year in office, Obama still
stands up to scrutiny – as a heavyweight at
least. Internationally, however, his substan-
tive record is not so good. often leading other
rich countries in a race to the bottom.
During Bush’s Presidency it was easy to cas-
tigate the US’s climate change policy – which,
after all, started off as efforts to deny its exist-
ence. During this time the US increased its
carbon emissions by % from levels,
while European Union countries for exam-
ple reduced theirs by %. Ireland’s of course
soared over this period. But the point is that
everyone expected fundamental change under
Obama.
However, looking at recent talks in
Thailand which were expected to lead to a deal
in Copenhagen this December to strengthen
Kyoto, the approach was not so good. Led by
the US, rich countries came together to call
for Kyoto with its binding targets for emis-
sion reductions by replaced by US proposals
allowing each country decide how much to cut,
then submit its plans to international moni-
toring – a scheme underwritten by hot air and
wishfulness. Furthermore, surprisingly given
the President’s professed concerns for global
equity, where Kyoto loaded primary respon-
sibility on the developed countries that chiefly
benefited from the carbon economy, the new
plan treats all countries the same.
The problem, as Naomi Klein has pointed
out, is that the side-of-the-mouth rhetoric
gives a licence to the weak of spirit to weaken
further. So the EU, which had indicated it
would spend between $bn and $bn a
year to help developing countries adapt to cli-
mate change, came to Bangkok with a much
lower offer, one similar to the traditional US
commitment to … nothing. Oxfam’s Antonio
Hill summed up the talks: “When the starting
gun fired, it became a race to the bottom, with
rich countries weakening existing commit-
ments under the international framework”.
More recently still European finance minis-
ters failed to agree on a funding package for
developing countries, with Poland and other
poorer eastern European countries unhappy
at being asked to subsidise action in countries
such as China and India whose economies are
growing strongly.
Klein notes that Obama-led equivocation
had a parallel effect at the United Nations
conference on racism in April. After extract-
ing wide-ranging deletions from the nego-
tiating text – no references to Israel or the
Palestinians, nothing on slavery reparations
– the Obama administration decided to boy-
cott anyway, pointing to the fact that the new
text reaffirmed the allegedly tainted document
adopted in in Durban.
And at G summits, especially the London
meeting in April, it seemed for a moment there
might be some kind of co-ordinated attempt
to rein in transnational financial speculators
and tax dodgers. Glittering French President
Sarkozy even pledged to leave the London sum-
mit if it failed to produce sustantive commit-
ments. But the Obama administration had no
interest in genuine multilateralism, advocat-
ing instead that countries should come up with
their own plans (or not) and hope for the best
– much like its reckless climate-change plan.
Sarkozy, needless to say, stayed with the glam-
our of the Obama halo; and, this time, stormed
nowhere.
Of course, Obama has made some good
moves on the world stage – like not siding with
the Honduras coup government, reaching out
to Iran and Cuba, supporting a UN women’s
agency ane leaning on Israel to stop expanding
illegal settlements in the West Bank, set a lead
on bankers’ pay, as well as ventilated much
rhetoric on issues including global finance, the
Middle East and nuclear weapons. But it is cer-
tainly the case that a centrist Obama has pro-
vided cover for abandonment of progress by
reluctant radicals outside the US.
Women in the home
One of the more exciting proposals in the
Green-FF Programme for Government is the
um commitment, “to proceed, subject to appro-
priate Oireachtas approval, with proposals to
hold a constitutional referendum to consider
amending Article . of the Constitution,
broadening the reference to the role of women
in the home to one which recognises the role of
the parent in the home”. Villager would have
thought the idea would have been to remove
the reference to anyone having a role within
the home, just in case they don’t want one.
Still, top work from some lawyer should avoid
any nasty practicalities - even if the referen-
dum goes ahead it will only be to consider the
amendment. Now that’s not exactly a hostage
to fortune. Villager is as homey as the next
man but he squirms at article . wherein
“the State recognises that by her life within
the home, woman gives to the State a support
without which the common good cannot be
achieved”. Villager reads this as Bunreacht na
hÉireann not even contemplating the exist-
ence of the sort of woman who might not lead
“her life within the home”. Now he’s on the
subject of eliminating constitutional voodoo-
isms, Villager, the biggest atheist in the whole
region, is none too happy that the Constitution,
against a legal background of which all other
laws must be framed, is invoked in the name of
the Holy Spirit. This, amazingly (to non-law-
yers), is how it goes:
In the Name of the Most Holy Trinity,
from Whom is all authority and to
Whom, as our final end, all actions
both of men and States must be
referred,
We, the people of Éire,
Humbly acknowledging all our obliga-
tions to our Divine Lord, Jesus Christ,
Who sustained our fathers through
centuries of trial … and so on
With Bunreacht na hÉireann for our fun-
damental law, it’s not surprising things
sometimes get a bit strange around here.
Women writers wanted
Anyway Villager’s progressive and feminist
views aren’t enough for one Green Senator at
least. He has been taking it in the neck from
Senator Deirdre De Búrca that the Village
hasn’t got enough women it. The Senator
told Villager there were too many over-opin-
ionated, fact-heavy male articles in the maga-
zine. Thankfully she’s also had the argument
with John Bowman and Vincent Browne
many times over the years. Anyway Villager
couldn’t agree more with the need for a bit of
feminising of the mag. Village is looking par-
ticularly for women writers, to submit pieces
that are hard-minded, fact-driven, original
and perhaps humorous. Suggestions and
submissions to the editor@villagemagazine.
ie are welcome.