

Villager
Lehman gonads
Interesting that no-one picked up on
Lehman’s testicles. In a recent interview
with Kathy Sheridan of the Irish Times,
Bertie Ahern insisted it was the collapse of
Lehman Brothers that did the real damage
to the Irish economy. “That decision will in
history be written as the biggest mistake
that American administration ever made,
because Lehmans was a world investment
bank. They had testicles [sic] everywhere.
Unlike with tentacles, Villager reckons,
that would not necessarily be an indicator
of influence.
Philanthropist in trouble
Villager was saddened to hear of the demise
of Hugh O’Regan who, with much s
fanfare, was responsible for such first-rate
projects as the Thomas Read Pub and Life.
Although he sold most of his empire some
years back, primarily to Simon Kelly, son of
Paddy, he seems to have reinvested too much
of the proceeds in the famous sump that is
the Dubin Sport Hotel, once owned by glam
s entrepreneur and eventual bankrupt,
Pat Quinn. O’Regan envisaged a cluster of
“eco” developments over the countryside
around Kilternan but had difficulty selling
the first phase. It appeared to Villager that
latterly O’Regan’s mind was more on the
environment than business and he spon-
sored a number of environmental initia-
tives and the Trinity Foundation as well as
the well-meaning “Rock the Vote” campaign.
His plan to develop a club for “social entre-
preneurs” on Stephen’s Green was imagina-
tive and Villager thinks it a little unkind that
Mr Justice Kelly in considering plans for liq-
uidation of the empire referred to “alleged
philanthropic purposes.
Educational élitism
Villager was amused to read the article, Am I
giving my children an advantage? Im tr ying
my hardest in the quaintly bourgeois Irish
Times. Written by former R journalist
Orlaith Carmody, it extolled the virtues of a
Clongowes Wood boarding-school education
for her sons - “men for others” and all that.
Fee-paying is not elitist, she argues. She fin-
ishes her interminable piece with a flourish:
we don’t have élite schools in this country,
as they do across the water. We have pri-
vately-managed schools where education is
provided by the State, and where after that
parents choose to have a particular ethos,
Catholic, Protestant or other, taught to
their children at their own expense. They
are populated by the sons and daughters of
ordinary, hard-working people exercising
their democratic right to choose. Orlaith
Carmody is married to Gavin Duffy who is a
Dragon on RTÉ’s Dragon’s Den. According
to the programme’s website, “in September
 his property portfolio, held privately
in his joint name with wife Orlaith was val-
ued at c. €m” - and luckily it goes on
to say its faring just fine in the downturn.
So Ms Carmody wins Villagers school féte
home-made jam prize for most cloyingly
self-unaware élitist.
In fact it sounds like she should be a target
for SIPTU’s General Secretary, Jack O’Connor
who has said that wealthy people will have
to contribute “substantially morethan they
are contributing at the present time, identi-
fying those earning over €, and with
“considerable reserves of wealth”. If Villager
had his way Clongowes would be priced or
fined out of all recognition and the young
Carmody-Duffys would go to the school next
door where it’s men (and women) for men
(and women) and stuff the others.
Move Liberty Hall
Talking of SIPTU, the union plans to replace
Liberty Hall, Dublin’s tallest building (City
Hall in Cork is higher), with something loftier
and bulkier. As usual the City Council plan-
ners are enthusiastic but Ulster Bank had a
nearby tower proposal turned down in the
mid-s, CIE had a recent high-rise set-
back on Tara St and of course Sean Dunne had
little luck in Ballsbridge. SIPTU could nd
themselves going down the now well-trod-
den, disillusioning process of getting approval
from Dublin City Council for the inevitable
“iconichigh-rise (with sky dome, sky deck,
sky bar or whatever) only to be turned down
after a fractious appeal, by An Bord Pleanála.
Perhaps the Unions might show how they
distinguish the public interest from their own
interest (or that of their members) Lets see
they’re not just CORI with beards instead of
collars. How about a site swap? Liberty Hall
is demolished as a failed non-functioning
experiment, SIPTU goes down to Docklands
on a NAMA site that suits high-rise and the hal-
lowed turf of James Larkin’s ITGWU headquar-
ters is made into a park or shrine dedicated to
the Great Man (Big Jim) and the Unions, but
open to the public. Given the amount govern-
ment shelled out recently for the refurbishment
of the existing building, including an attrac-
tive theatre, Villager has no doubt if Jack just
keeps his mouth shut and organises a lot fewer
marches, the whole project could be subsidised
by some “social partnership funds.
Mail on Sunday
Scoop Pooped
Villager sympathises with the Mail on Sunday,
the next Village as it were, in its frustrated
attempts to get Mary Harneys travel expenses.
They finally received them an illegal month
village_oct_09.indd 15 27/10/2009 15:37:44
 — village November - December 2009
 Villager
late, at pm on a Friday, just when any sensi-
ble journalist would be downing his second
Erdinger. It was worth it though, showing
€, in VIP world travel for Harney, ex-
IBEC-head and health-privatiser husband,
Brian Geoghegan, and their lucky, none-too-
frugal entourages.
Obama, Climate
and the abandonment
of radicalism
After nearly a year in office, Obama still
stands up to scrutiny as a heavyweight at
least. Internationally, however, his substan-
tive record is not so good. often leading other
rich countries in a race to the bottom.
During Bushs Presidency it was easy to cas-
tigate the US’s climate change policy – which,
after all, started off as efforts to deny its exist-
ence. During this time the US increased its
carbon emissions by % from  levels,
while European Union countries for exam-
ple reduced theirs by %. Ireland’s of course
soared over this period. But the point is that
everyone expected fundamental change under
Obama.
However, looking at recent talks in
Thailand which were expected to lead to a deal
in Copenhagen this December to strengthen
Kyoto, the approach was not so good. Led by
the US, rich countries came together to call
for Kyoto with its binding targets for emis-
sion reductions by replaced by US proposals
allowing each country decide how much to cut,
then submit its plans to international moni-
toring a scheme underwritten by hot air and
wishfulness. Furthermore, surprisingly given
the President’s professed concerns for global
equity, where Kyoto loaded primary respon-
sibility on the developed countries that chiefly
benefited from the carbon economy, the new
plan treats all countries the same.
The problem, as Naomi Klein has pointed
out, is that the side-of-the-mouth rhetoric
gives a licence to the weak of spirit to weaken
further. So the EU, which had indicated it
would spend between $bn and $bn a
year to help developing countries adapt to cli-
mate change, came to Bangkok with a much
lower offer, one similar to the traditional US
commitment to … nothing. Oxfam’s Antonio
Hill summed up the talks: “When the starting
gun red, it became a race to the bottom, with
rich countries weakening existing commit-
ments under the international framework”.
More recently still European finance minis-
ters failed to agree on a funding package for
developing countries, with Poland and other
poorer eastern European countries unhappy
at being asked to subsidise action in countries
such as China and India whose economies are
growing strongly.
Klein notes that Obama-led equivocation
had a parallel effect at the United Nations
conference on racism in April. After extract-
ing wide-ranging deletions from the nego-
tiating text no references to Israel or the
Palestinians, nothing on slavery reparations
– the Obama administration decided to boy-
cott anyway, pointing to the fact that the new
text rearmed the allegedly tainted document
adopted in  in Durban.
And at Gsummits, especially the London
meeting in April, it seemed for a moment there
might be some kind of co-ordinated attempt
to rein in transnational financial speculators
and tax dodgers. Glittering French President
Sarkozy even pledged to leave the London sum-
mit if it failed to produce sustantive commit-
ments. But the Obama administration had no
interest in genuine multilateralism, advocat-
ing instead that countries should come up with
their own plans (or not) and hope for the best
– much like its reckless climate-change plan.
Sarkozy, needless to say, stayed with the glam-
our of the Obama halo; and, this time, stormed
nowhere.
Of course, Obama has made some good
moves on the world stage like not siding with
the Honduras coup government, reaching out
to Iran and Cuba, supporting a UN women’s
agency ane leaning on Israel to stop expanding
illegal settlements in the West Bank, set a lead
on bankers’ pay, as well as ventilated much
rhetoric on issues including global finance, the
Middle East and nuclear weapons. But it is cer-
tainly the case that a centrist Obama has pro-
vided cover for abandonment of progress by
reluctant radicals outside the US.
Women in the home
One of the more exciting proposals in the
Green-FF Programme for Government is the
um commitment, “to proceed, subject to appro-
priate Oireachtas approval, with proposals to
hold a constitutional referendum to consider
amending Article . of the Constitution,
broadening the reference to the role of women
in the home to one which recognises the role of
the parent in the home. Villager would have
thought the idea would have been to remove
the reference to anyone having a role within
the home, just in case they don’t want one.
Still, top work from some lawyer should avoid
any nasty practicalities - even if the referen-
dum goes ahead it will only be to consider the
amendment. Now that’s not exactly a hostage
to fortune. Villager is as homey as the next
man but he squirms at article . wherein
the State recognises that by her life within
the home, woman gives to the State a support
without which the common good cannot be
achieved”. Villager reads this as Bunreacht na
ireann not even contemplating the exist-
ence of the sort of woman who might not lead
her life within the home. Now he’s on the
subject of eliminating constitutional voodoo-
isms, Villager, the biggest atheist in the whole
region, is none too happy that the Constitution,
against a legal background of which all other
laws must be framed, is invoked in the name of
the Holy Spirit. This, amazingly (to non-law-
yers), is how it goes:
In the Name of the Most Holy Trinity,
from Whom is all authority and to
Whom, as our nal end, all actions
both of men and States must be
referred,
We, the people of Éire,
Humbly acknowledging all our obliga-
tions to our Divine Lord, Jesus Christ,
Who sustained our fathers through
centuries of trial … and so on
With Bunreacht na hÉireann for our fun-
damental law, its not surprising things
sometimes get a bit strange around here.
Women writers wanted
Anyway Villager’s progressive and feminist
views aren’t enough for one Green Senator at
least. He has been taking it in the neck from
Senator Deirdre De rca that the Village
hasn’t got enough women it. The Senator
told Villager there were too many over-opin-
ionated, fact-heavy male articles in the maga-
zine. Thankfully shes also had the argument
with John Bowman and Vincent Browne
many times over the years. Anyway Villager
couldn’t agree more with the need for a bit of
feminising of the mag. Village is looking par-
ticularly for women writers, to submit pieces
that are hard-minded, fact-driven, original
and perhaps humorous. Suggestions and
submissions to the editor@villagemagazine.
ie are welcome.
village_oct_09.indd 16 27/10/2009 15:37:47

 Samhain
village_oct_09.indd 17 27/10/2009 15:37:51

Loading

Back to Top