— October – November 2013
T
HREE weeks old, warm and gently
snoring on my shoulder as I write,
you are closer to nature than you
will ever be again. With your animal
needs and animal cries, moved by a slow pri-
mordial spirit that will soon be submerged in
the cacophony of thought and language, you
belong, it seems to me, more to the biosphere
than to the human sphere. Already it feels
like years since I saw you, my second daugh-
ter, in the scan, your segmented skeleton
revealed like an ancient beast uncovered by
geologists, buried in the rock of ages. Already
I have begun to entertain the hopes and fears
to which every parent has succumbed, per-
haps since the early hominids laid down the
prints which show that the human spark had
been struck.
Let me begin at the beginning, with the
organisation to which you might owe your life.
When I was born, almost years ago, in the
bitter winter of , the National Health
Service was just years old. It must still
have been hard for people to believe that – for
the first time in the history of these islands
– they could fall ill without risking financial
ruin, that no one need die for want of funds.
I see this system as the summit of civilisation,
one of the wonders of the world.
Now it is so much a part of our lives that
it is just as hard to believe that we might lose
it. But I fear that, when you have reached my
age, free, universal healthcare will be a dis-
tant fantasy, a mythologised arcadia as far
removed from the experience of your chil-
dren’s generation as the Blitz was from mine.
One of the lessons you will learn, painfully
and reluctantly, is that nothing of public
value exists which has not been fought for.
The growth of this system was one of the
remarkable features of the first half of the
period through which I have lived. Then,
wealth was widely shared and the power of
those who had monopolised it was shaken.
Taxation was used without embarrassment as
a means of redistributing the commonwealth
of humanity. This great social progress is also
being rolled back, and, though perhaps I am
getting ahead of myself, I fear for your later
years. My generation appears to be squan-
dering your birthright.
This destruction echoes our treatment
of the natural world. In my childhood, it
would never have occurred to me that birds
as common as the cuckoo, the sparrow and
the starling could suffer so rapid a decline
that I would live to see them classed as
endangered in this country. I remember the
astonishing variety of moths that clustered
on the windows on warm summer nights, the
eels, dense as wickerwork, moving downri-
ver every autumn, field mushrooms nosing
through grassy meadows in their thousands.
These are sights that you might never see. By
the time your children are born, the tiger, the
rhino, the bluefin tuna and many of the other
animals that have so enthralled me could be
nothing but a cause of regret.
We now have a better understanding than
we did when I was born – a year after Silent
Spring was published – of the natural limits
within which we live. The science of plane-
tary boundaries has begun to establish the
points beyond which the natural resources
Rewild your kids
Contact, attachment some defence in world collapsing
socially and environmentally. By George Monbiot
ENVIRONMENT reWilding
pic
caption
here
which make our lives viable can no longer be
sustained. Already, this tells us, we may have
trespassed across three of the nine bounda-
ries, and we are pushing towards three others.
You may live to see the extremes of climate
change I have spent much of my life hoping
we can avert, accompanied by further eco-
logical disasters, such as the acidification of
the oceans, the loss of most of the world’s
remaining forests, its wetlands and fossil
water reserves, its large predators, fish and
coral reefs. If so, you will doubtless boggle at
the stupidity and short-sightedness of those
who preceded you. No one can claim that we
were not warned.
There is another possible route, which I
have spent the past two years researching and
to which I have decided to devote much of the
rest of my working life. This is a positive envi-
ronmentalism, which envisages the rewilding
– the ecological restoration – of large tracts
of unproductive land and over-exploited sea.
It recognises nature’s remarkable capacity to
recover, to re-establish the complex web of
ecological relationships through which, so far,
we have crudely blundered. Rather than fight-
ing only to arrest destruction, it proposes a
better, richer world, a place in which, I hope,
you would delight to live.
There is one respect at least in which
this country and many others have already
become better places. I believe that family
life, contrary to the assertions of politicians
and newspapers, is now better than it has
been for centuries, as the old, cold model of
detached parenting and the damage – psy-
chological, neurological and (some research
suggests) epigenetic – that it appears to have
caused finally begins to disappear.
Perhaps the greatest source of hope and
social progress arises from our rediscov-
ery of the animal needs of babies and young
children: the basic requirements of com-
fort, contact and attachment. Yes, attached
parenting is taxing (now you are beginning
to writhe and rumble and I fear that your
mother, exhausted from a night of almost
constant feeding, will soon have to wake
again), but it is, I believe, the one sure foun-
dation of a better world. Knowing what we
now know, we have an opportunity to avert
the damage, the unrequited needs that have
caused so many social ills, which lie perhaps
at the root of war, of destructive greed, of the
need to dominate.
So this is where hope lies: right at the
beginning, with the recognition that you,
like all of us, arose from and belong to the
natural world.
This article first appeared in the Guardian.
www.monbiot.com