
June 2017 5 5
garden to the rear. The walls of the new structure
would be less than two metres higher than the
existing walls of the baths, and all trees and
shrubs on the site would be retained.
There is currently an application by from the
Clontarf Baths and Assembly Rooms Company
Ltd, approved by Dublin City Council, awaiting a
decision from An Bord Pleanála. The scheme
designed by Moran Noonan Architecture con
-
sists of:Demolition of the existing derelict
one-storey structure on site; the provision of a
flood defence wall to protect the baths; the refur-
bishment and reinstatement of the existing
seawater swimming pool area including the
refurbishment and upgrading of the existing
perimeter swimming pool wall and the provision
of changing cubicles; construction of a single-
storey lifeguard viewing platform at the existing
baths upper level; construction of a pavilion res-
taurant and café bar with a covered terrace area.
An Bord Pleanála’s inspector’s report notes
that such facilities are commonly used to subsi-
dise the primary recreational facility. The
situation in this case would appear to be no dif-
ferent. The applicant has made it clear that the
proposed restaurant and café bar is necessary
to fund and sustain the maintenance and opera
-
tion of the seawater baths which is unlikely to
happen without this element of the proposal.
Dún Laoghaire dip
Bath areas in old Dún Laoghaire have been noted
in maps dating from the 1790s. sources mention
baths in Kingstown being built by the Royal Hotel
in 1828. They were probably removed to make
way for the construction of the railway in 1836.
In 1843 John Croswaite built baths in the corner
of Scotman’s bay. Originally known as the Royal
Victorian baths, they were only used by those
who had the means to afford them. They were
extremely popular and Dún Laoghaire became
one of the best and most popular places in Ire-
land to bathe. These were rebuilt in 1864. In
1896 Kingstown Urban District Council pur
-
chased the baths site and the firm of Alexander
Fraser was engaged to build the new baths on
today’s site. This is the site of today’s Dún
Laoghaire Baths. Kingstown Urban District
Council bought the baths in the late 1890s and
renovated them between 1907 and 1908 to the
designs of W Kaye Parry. These baths were con
-
structed throughout with Vectis brand cement
and granite aggregate. The current derelict
Edwardian entrance dates from this time. There
was a range of bathing options including sea and
fresh water, hot and cold. Children had their own
pond and paddling pools and there were medi-
cal baths. These included sulphur, seaweed and
Russian and hot sea-water. Moderate charges
helped to increase their popularity as well as the
fact that they were maintained to a high stand-
ard. Service was excellent and included the
provision of hot towels if required. Crosthwaite
also built baths at Seapoint, which were pri-
vately owned. During the 1970s heated indoor
pools were added as well as a water fun park
(Rainbow Rapids). In 1997 the outdoor baths
were closed when a proposal was made to
develop a huge water complex on the site. This
proposal did not come to fruition, due in part to
the huge public outcry, but the baths remained
closed. In 2005 proposals were made available
for members of the public to view regarding the
development of the baths.
One of the great features of the site of Dún
Laoghaire Baths is that it is on an elevated spot,
with great views towards Dún Laoghaire Har-
bour, Dublin Bay and the Forty Foot.
In recent years a number of redevelopment
plans have been put forward including a €140m
plan to build an eight-storey building with 180
apartments. These plans fell through leaving us
now with a development that will bring together
the seafront area from Sandycove to the Pier.
SOS
The issue of Dún Laoghaire Baths has been stag-
nant for many years because of difficulties with
a foreshore licence that would allow the Council
to carry out the necessary works. This part of
south Dublin has the most efficacious of cam-
paigners, particularly the successful Save our
Seafront (SOS), supported by local association
of An Taisce, whose protest march on 18 Septem-
ber 2005 stopped the eight-storey scheme. They
oppose the floating baths proposal to be installed
inside the East Pier. Fergal McLoughlin of SOS
explained “We are in favour of the limited plans
for Dún Laoghaire Baths, particularly as we have
been campaigning for years for the restoration of
the baths at their original site. We would prefer if
the actual baths or a modern version were
included in the new plans, which is unfortunately
not the case. “We will continue to press for the
baths as part of the new development…It is on
hold and hopefully will vanish, or sink”.
The plans which eventually got the green light
are by A2 Architects in conjunction with Dún
Laoghaire Rathdown Architects Department,
due to be completed by Summer 2018. Under the
scheme, estimated to cost €2.5m, the existing
Baths Pavilion will be retained and refurbished
for use as artist workspaces, a gallery café and
for the provision of public toilet facilities. and
Existing dilapidated structures to the rear of the
pavilion will be removed to permit the creation
of a new route and landscaping that will connect
the walkway at Newtownsmith to both the East
Pier and the People’s Park. It is proposed that
the existing saltwater pools will be filled in, cre-
ating new enhanced facilities for sea swimming
and greater access to the water’s edge by means
of a short jetty.
A new jetty and a changing area will be created
to provide enhanced access to the water for sea
swimmers and to provide a landing point for
kayaks and canoes and other small marine craft.
This jetty will be linked by new steps to the ‘café
terrace’ at the Baths Pavilion and to the pedes
-
trian crossing point leading to the People’s Park.
It is also hoped that jet water fountains could be
installed in the area next to the pedestrian
routes, between the Baths Pavilion and the sea.
Dublin and Kingstown Railway companion, drawn
and engraved by John Kirkwood, Dublin, 1834
It is remarkable how
well some of these
structures have stood
the ‘test of time’, particularly
where they have been subject
to minimal maintenance