10April 2015
T
HE controversy surround-
ing the acquisition of lands at
Charlesland, near Greystones
in Wicklow by property devel-
opers Sean Mulryan and Sean
Dunne in 2004 continues to haunt the
local authority even since the departure
last month of county manager, Eddie
Sheehy.
Environment minister, Alan Kelly, is
under pressure from juniornance min-
ister and Wicklow TD, Simon Harris, and
other local representatives to initiate an
inquiry into the relations between the
two prominent developers and senior
council officials as well as into the con-
tinuing saga of the multi-million-euro
illegal waste dumping scandal in the
garden county.
Among the key features of the
controversy at Charlesland are the cir-
cumstances surrounding the transfer
of valuable rights over council lands
to companies controlled by Dunne and
Mulryan, which provided them with
access to the largely landlocked site
estimated at the time to have a poten-
tial value of €2.5bn.
Over recent months, Village has put
several queries to Wicklow County
Council about a contract signed in July
2003 by Sheehy and Fianna il coun-
cillor, Pat Vance, on the one hand and
by legal representatives for two com-
panies, Brambleglen Ltd and Ballymore
contracting Ltd, Mulryan and Dunne.
The contract provided crucial road
access to the Charlesland site where
the developers had permission to
build almost 1,400 homes along with
shopping and other facilities. Local auc-
tioneer, Gabriel Dooley, who assembled
the lands from the Evans and Tracey
families in the preceding years claims
that Mulryan and Dunne had a special
relationship with the council which
ensured that they were able to acquire
the valuable road access across its lands
at minimum cost.
In reply to a question from Village, the
Council in early April conrmed that it
“exchanged easements with Mr Dunne
and the other parties.
There was in fact no disposal of land
to Mr Dunne and the other parties you
referred to in your enquiry. The County
Council exchanged easements with
Mr Dunne and the other parties over
the lands which make up the dual-car-
riageway at Charlesland which are the
subject of the registration mentioned in
your email. This road has facilitated the
subsequent development of lands owned
by IDA (Ireland), Wicklow County Coun-
cil and those developers”, the Council
said.
The statement confirms that the con-
tract agreed in July 2003 and seen by
Village was the instrument used to eect
the exchange of easements. The Coun-
cil did not respond to a question about
the value of the lands in question or why
Councillor Pat Vance was a signature to
the agreement when he did not represent
the Charlesland or Greystones areas. It
stated, however: All elected members
are authorised to be in attendance at/
witness the axing of the council seal
on documents.
Land-registry documents confirm
that the “right of way and other ease-
ments” in favour of Sean Mulryan, Sean
Dunne, Brambleglen Ltd and Ballymore
Contracting Ltd. were transferred on
22nd January 2004.
According to Dooley, the circa 6.5
acres of zoned land in question were
worth in excess of €10m at their 2003
value and provided an additional,
unquantifiable, benefit to the develop-
ers who required them to gain access
to much of the Charlesland site. The
exchange was made without any dis-
cussion by the elected members of the
council and without the knowledge of
the Greystones/Delgany area committee
which would have been expected to be
informed about such a major land deal.
It also followed the defeat of a request
by the County management, at a coun-
cil meeting on 12th May, 2003, and
Environment minister must order investigation of why road access given by Council
to Mulryan and Dunne. By Frank Connolly
Alan Kelly is
under pressure
from minister
Simon Harris
and other local
representatives
to initiate an
inquiry into
relations
between the
developers and
senior council
officials
Wick-lowdown, 2015
NEWS Wicklow
Charlesland
April 2015 11
proposed by Councillor Vance, for a
material contravention of the Wicklow
County Development plan to facili-
tate aspects of the Charlesland scheme
which was under construction by Zapi
Ltd, the joint venture formed by Mul-
ryan and Dunne.
After a sometimes heated discus-
sion at the Council, the county manager
failed to get the necessary 18 votes
to agree the material contravention.
At the heart of the discussion was the
concern by councillors of the effect on
Greystones commercial town centre of
a competing retail development at Char-
lesland, the largest residential scheme
in the county. According to the minutes
of the meeting, councillors were also
exercised over the commencement of
works by the developer and there were
calls for some issues to be referred to
the High Court. They rejected a threat
by the county manager to refuse the
entire planning application unless the
members accepted the proposal to con-
travene the development plan.
Almost all the Fianna il and Fine
Gael members of the council supported
the motion but several others includ-
ing then councillors Deirdre De Burca
(Green), Liam Kavanagh, Liz McManus,
both Labour, and Eleanor Roche, wife of
former minister, Dick Roche, abstained.
Independent councillor Tommy Cullen
was the only member to vote against the
motion which fell for lack of support.
Two months earlier, in March 2003,
Dooley was present in Dobbins restau-
rant in Dublin for a meeting lasting
several hours between Mulryan, Dunne
and Vance. At this meeting, he claims
that maps of the proposed scheme and
the road-access routes, and a strategy
for the successful acquisition of the nec-
essary lands, were discussed.
In the July 2003 contract, the council
agreed to acquire whatever additional
lands were needed by the developers by
compulsory purchase order.
Notably, nothing has emerged to
suggest that either Councillor Vance or
Sheehy acted improperly at any time.
When landowners John Nolan and
William Irwin then refused to sell their
lands at Three Trout Stream adjoining
the development to Zapi or to the Council
a compulsory purchase order was signed
in January 2004. Eight days later, the
exchange of easements was registered
to the developers on the nearby council
and IDA lands.
The on-going row over planning
decisions at Wicklow comes at a time
when Mulryan is planning to exit the
National Assets Management Agency
(NAMA) and Dunne is seeking to pro-
tect various assets from the Agency and
from various banks in Ireland and the
US, including lands he has said he owns
with his wife at Greystones.
NAMA is also the subject of a com-
plaint by Dooley to the Garda Bureau
of Fraud Investigation which has been
asked to investigate the manner in which
details of the estate agents private
discussions with its officials and rep-
resentatives of the former Anglo-Irish
Bank were revealed to a senior executive
of Ballymore Properties.
Dooley has claimed that Mulryan is
in breach of an agreement to pay him
€4m in relation to a property venture
at Florentine in Bray in which he was a
partner.
He has further claimed that informa-
tion about this claim which he provided
in confidence to NAMA officials was
passed on to Ballymore. •
NEWS Wicklow
GABRIEL Dooley has alleged that the
National Assets Management Agency (NAMA)
has breached his confidence by revealing
details of private conversations he had
with his bank to a company controlled by
property developer, Sean Mulryan.
In a detailed statement to the Garda
Bureau of Fraud Investigation seen by
Village
, he has claimed that senior executives
of Anglo Irish Bank (now the IBRC) and
NAMA passed on sensitive commercial
information to a (named) senior executive
of the Ballymore Group in late 2010.
The information concerned a threat by Dooley
to take legal proceedings against Mulryan and
Ballymore over an alleged breach of contract
involving a planned multi-million-euro retail
development in Florentine in Bray town centre.
In 2005, Dooley agreed to sell his 50%
shareholding in Florentine Properties Ltd to his
joint-venture partners, Ballymore, for €5.2m.
A down payment of €1m was paid to Dooley
with the balance of €4m due on completion of
the shopping centre or on the sale of the site.
In 2007, Ballymore agreed to the compulsory
purchase of the Florentine site by Bray
Town Council and the deal was given the
go-ahead by An Bord Pleanála, following
an oral hearing, in February 2009.
However, Dooley has claimed that
Ballymore refused to honour its commitment
to pay the €4m balance he was owed for his
shareholding in Florentine Properties Ltd.
When he informed Anglo that he intended
to pursue Ballymore for the outstanding
monies in early November and December
2010, the information was passed on to
officials of NAMA based in the London branch
of the bank and from there to Ballymore. At
that time, Ballymore was one of the largest
clients of NAMA with some €2.75bn of its
loans transferred to the ‘bad bank’ agency.
Dooley has provided detailed email
communications to the fraud squad which
established that information about his
planned legal action was passed to Ballymore
and resulted in an angry phone call from
one of its senior executives in Dublin.
“On 8th December 2010 I received a phone
call from …(a named executive) of Ballymore
stating that he had received a call and an email
regarding the €4m due to me. He was furious
on the phone as I had showed an intention to
issue proceedings against Ballymore……(He)
stated to me that Ballymore always regarded
me as a long-standing close friend of Ballymore
Group going back many years. No one else
was aware of my plan to sue Ballymore except
myself, the Anglo people and my legal team.
There is no reason at this time that Ballymore
should have been aware of this highly sensitive
information”, Dooley said in the statement
made to the fraud squad on 15th January last.
In January 2011, he refused an offer
of a six-figure sum from Ballymore
to settle the outstanding debt.
He said that the breach of confidentiality led
to a breakdown in trust with his bank, Anglo,
which appointed a receiver over his property
portfolio and had a devastating effect on his
“private auctioneering business..my wife and
my five children”, according to the statement.
The fraud squad has already taken criminal
proceedings against another former official
of NAMA, Enda Farrell, who is accused of
wrongly disclosing confidential information
from the agency. The case is expected
to continue into early next year. •
Frank Connolly
Dooley and NAMA

Loading

Back to Top