, I received what could
be seen, at best, as a benign answer to a ques-
tion I’d submitted to Vladimir Spidla, European
Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs
and Equal Opportunities.
I asked if the Commission could indicate
whether it had initiated proceedings against
the Government regarding Ireland’s continued
compliance with the Race Directive, approved
by the European Parliament and by all EU
Governments in , and other EU equality
laws, given the massive cutback of % imposed
on The Equality Authority in October . The
Commission had previously issued formal warn-
ings to the Government regarding the incorrect
‘transposition’, or enactment into Irish law, of the
Race Directive.
The Commission responded that while
the Race Directive does not require member
states to provide a particular level of funding or
organisational structure for equality bodies, in
the absence of clear evidence suggesting that the
budget available to the Equality Authority was
not sufficient to carry out its duties, it could not
intervene on this matter.
But the Commission may get this evidence
sooner than it expects. The Equality Authority’s
budget has fallen from €.m to €.m in a year.
The number of posts will fall from to . The
number of case-files handled by the Authority
fell from in to just in . The
Authority was considering opening two formal
legal enquiries - one into the employment condi-
tions of disabled persons in sheltered workshops,
and the other into the conditions of agency work-
ers - but these have now been shelved.
So far this year, the number of legal cases
failing at the Equality Tribunal far outweighs
those succeeding. Furthermore, the number of
claims taken on multiple grounds of discrimina-
tion has fallen by some % over the previous
year. These claims typically require considera-
ble legal assistance from the Equality Authority
(there is no other free legal advice on discrimi-
nation specifically). It is becoming more than
evident that the disproportionate cut, cou-
pled with the complication of decentralisation,
means that The Equality Authority cannot “carry
out its duties”.
The fact that the Government conveniently
abolished the National Consultative Committee
on Racism and Interculturalism (NCCRI) at the
same time as it silenced The Equality Authority
won’t have helped its case here.
This initial evidence – and I have no doubt
that the evidence bank will grow at the expense
of ordinary people living with discrimination –
is why I have supported a formal legal complaint
to the European Commission from Equality &
Rights Alliance (ERA) that Ireland has moved
from a tenuous compliance to non-compliance
with EU equality laws we helped negotiate and
voluntarily accepted nine years ago.
I have also supported a parallel petition to the
European Parliament. The petition can be heard
within a matter of months by the Parliament’s
Petitions Committee, which can then direct the
Commission to ask the Irish authorities to jus-
tify their position. The Parliament could then
make recommendations to the Commission or to
Irish Government. If the Commission, however,
upholds the complaint during the course of the
coming year, it has the right to refer Ireland to
the European Court of Justice for failing to com-
ply with its obligations under the Race Directive.
In that case, the only way the Government could
avoid legal action in the ECJ would be by provid-
ing adequate and proportionate funding to its
national equality body.
In contrast to the Irish Government’s actions,
recent developments at EU level seek to further
strengthen equality bodies, as part of Europe’s
deepening equality agenda. In July , the
Commission issued a long-anticipated proposal
for a directive tackling discrimination in the pro-
vision of services and goods. In its April
resolution on this draft, the European Parliament
adopted an amendment providing that Member
States must have in place an independently func-
tioning and adequately funded national body to
promote equal treatment. This amendment, and
others put forward by MEPs last April, are cur-
rently being discussed by Member States’ Justice
Ministers. This is one of the measures that has
suffered from Ireland’s rejection of the Lisbon
Treaty last year, since Lisbon gives MEPs a much
stronger hand during the negotiations with the
Council on the adoption of anti-discrimination
directives (Art., TFEU Consolidated).
Equality legislation in Ireland is enjoying
only its -year anniversary. The Employment
Equality Act was enacted in , and in
November of the same year, the Equality
Authority was established. Over the past dec-
ade, the Irish Government has enthusiastically
held its equality laws forward as a model of good
practice within the EU and internationally.
In anticipation of these equality anniversa-
ries, the Government should be setting out how
Ireland will remain in the vanguard of equality
and human rights promotion and protection in
Europe. Sadly, it has used the cover of financial
constraints to mount a targeted attack on our
equality infrastructure, to silence critical voices
and to defy the spirit of EU equality law. It may
yet end up in the European Court of Justice as a
result.
’
Equality
A legal complaint that Ireland is in breach of EU law is the start of
vital evidence required to ensure that the European Commission takes
Ireland’s fall from equality grace seriously
p r o i n s i a s d e r o s s a m e p (l a b o u r )
PHOTO: PHOTOCALL IRELAND
PHOTO: PHOTOCALL IRELAND