
March/April 2022 13
shame if the business empire he built over four
decades and the employment it brought to an
otherwise forgotten part of Ireland, were to
crumble”. Cavan County Council backed the
bid.
In December 2014 Sean Quinn famously
served a tray of drinks to a meeting which had
agreed that McCarey would be CEO on €500k
salary, Kevin Lunney would be COO at €345k
and Quinn would be consultant on €500k. 11%
of the Quinn Industrial Holdings would be
owned by QBRC and another 11% by the same
entity QBRC but in trust for its Directors who
described themselves as “Sponsors”. On the
recommendation of Sean Quinn Fine Gael
Councillor John McCartin (apparently compro-
misingly), Ernie Fisher And John Bosco
O’Hagan, all with links to the community,
secured lucrative salaries as well as director-
ships, and were the sole shareholders in QBRC
with its ambiguous 22% of what remained of
the Quinn Group. The future of the community
rested with them.
An email from Liam McCarey said “As you
will see from our mission statement the sole
motivation driving this initiative is to protect
the economic wellbeing of this local area ensur-
ing that the former Quinn Group business is
local managed and controlled for the benefit of
this community and most importantly kept
“whole” and not disposed of piecemeal”.
As far as CFL and the community was con-
cerned this was mission-accomplished. How
naïve they were: this couldn’t have been further
from the truth. The wording of commitments
from the new management such as from
McCarey above was inadequate to guarantee
the community control or any stake in the prof
-
its, though arguably it actually owns the stake
as beneficiary.
Everything unravelled. The boys and Quinn
did not get on, and he was sacked, to CFL’s
horror. The directors have not been responsive
to the community and have not facilitated the
intended return to business for Sean Quinn.
In June 2016 CFL asked for a meeting with
the management team in QIH with concerns at
how the company was being run. QIH facili-
tated this meeting which had some frank
exchanges. They said Quinn brought ongoing
reputational damage to the Company. It was
the last meeting.
CFL set up a Facebook group and publicised
some embarrassing things about McCarey,
who had been incumbent CEO of the Quinn
Group when the receiver was appointed, and
now was CEO of QIH, including an allegation
that he had diverted a £97,000 invoice due to
be paid by a UK-based business called Nu-Span
that he and his wife owned, for a steel delivery,
to QIH. CFL alleged [see Complaint, extreme
bottom] there had been no declaration of a
Director’s interest and while there had been an
adjustment to the Quinn account no money had
actually been paid in to reconcile the invoice
for £97,000. It alleged on another occasion
a c €30k credit note was issued to Nu-Span
flooring without proper consultation with the
relevant divisional manager, though there
was already concern about the £97,000 and
though €30,000 was three or four times the
normal credit limit. The man who drew atten-
tion to these improprieties, Denis Doogan, a
director of QIH and a director of Nu-Span was
sacked. The women who furnished him with
the information changed their stories. Sean
Quinn also went to the Garda with complaints
that €167,063 in credit notes were irregularly
made out by Quinn Cement to its biggest
rival, Irish Cement, part of the CRH Group.
In 2016 Sean Quinn wrote to Councillor
John McCartin:
“The four million [he should have said six
million] pound golden handshake or bribe,
call it what you may, that QBRC was to be
paid to facilitate the sale of glass, has since
through some accounting wizardry never
made its way to QBRC and mark my words we
will leave no stone unturned in relation to
investigating what has actually taken place
here once we have possession of all the
facts. At this juncture, needless to say, it is
blatantly obvious that a fundamental conflict
of interest exists for the three senior direc-
tors of Quinn Building Products to continue
with their directorship positions on the board
of QBRC”.
And of course by this time the money
raised by QBRC for certain aims had gone
into the Company though it was clear that
neither Quinn Building Products nor QBRC
was at any stage serious about implement-
ing the original mandate. The company was
being run – as would ordinarily be the case
- in the financial interests of shareholders
rather than the long-term interest of the com-
munity which appeared had a subtantial
stake in it, as beneficiary. On the occasion of
the sale of each Glass, Plastics and Radiators
– none of which was in the spirit of the agree-
ment - senior executives achieved significant
pay-outs. It is this dynamic that is now being
tested in the High Court by CFL.
The sale of Glass has put the jobs of 300
workers at risk. With Quinn Glass having two
plants, one at Derrylin (23 years old) and the
other the most modern glass plant in Europe,
at Elton in the UK: a new plant) it is a concern
for the community that the older plant will be
closed at some stage in the future. Moreover
€50m of profits annually has been repatri-
ated to Spain, as can be seen in the accounts
of the new parent company for Glass.
This was totally contrary to what QBRC’s
aims and objectives were created to be; and
the reason today why so much ill feeling,
anger and diehard Sean Quinnery prevail in
the community.
Internl QIH document showing it ws investigting
llegtions of impropriety by McCffrey with Nu-spn
Letter drfted by Lim McCffrey for CFL to send to
RPC Continers to deter them from buying Quinn
Pckging, 2014