
— June - July 2010
We believe that it will be difficult to charge
in a way that is fair – different types: older peo-
ple, babies, it’s hard to cater for that. If you pro-
vide good water, you are providing dignity and
health. It’s an important anti-poverty measure –
extremely important in terms of public health.
When it comes to water charging, I think
there are other ways of encouraging peo-
ple. I think when the council does this, peo-
ple respond to awareness campaigns. I know I
represent a fair amount of the population when I
am brushing my teeth. One of the things we have
heard is that you don’t need to run the tap. I’m
very wary of buying into this idea of pricing - I
think there is a lot we can do with the natural
inclination to environment.
►
What about the Windfall Tax on rezoning
profits and the Kenny Report?
I’m not sure about the windfall tax – how it will
operate in practice. Councils are not rezoning
lots of land at the moment. So will it still be
in place?
I think the Kenny Report is better. I was
on the all-party committee on housing. That
Committee took a favourable view to the Kenny
Report or something along those lines. We need
to move away from a small group of developers
hoarding land – that not been good for plan-
ning policy. Those guys are so big, they have
such huge resources in drawing up plans and
lobbying.
There seems to be no attempt in the present
planning bill to address the failure of the
social housing requirements in the 2001
Planning Act?
Yeah, something went wrong. Although the
idea was good, it left too much focus on the
private developer delivering for people who
needed affordable housing. I think there
needs to be a stronger element of public hous-
ing. We want a good, strong component of
social housing delivered directly. Mind you,
I’m not the spokesman - my colleague will
be coming up with proposals about housing.
But certainly our record from to
shows increased social housing which went
back down again after we were out. I think
that a lot of the stuff we did in the last few
years was in terms of a housing bubble that
has to be looked at.
►
The Labour Party at their conference
appeared to support further turf cutting in
the designated European nature conserva-
tion sites. Is that one under your remit?
It is my remit – I think the point that’s being
made is that human beings are part of the
environment. I think that more could be done
to involve the turf-cutters and there could
be more flexibility. We had the Turf-cutters’
Association speaking to the Environmental
Committee and my own impression was there
should have been more consultation terms of
the way National Parks and Wildlife Service
and the Department of Environment imple-
ments these decisions. They need to get into
conflict-resolution and problem-solving and
get people on board.
My parents were from Mayo and I spent a
lot of time at my cousins with my Dad where we
cut turf. It was an important social element. The
people did so much for animal welfare. They did
whatever they could to preserve the environ-
ment – the actual people and their role in it. It’s
not about getting people more money because
we do want people stay on the land and preserve
certain traditions. That is the way I would tend
to be sympathetic to people on the ground.
It’s not just turf-cutting – I’ve come across
local communities who feel that the Habitats
Directive can be a bit inflexible. Another exam-
ple: sometimes land is isolated by protected
areas and you can’t develop – you can’t do any-
thing on it but there’s people running quads
up it or whatever. So I think things can back-
fire. I’m not blaming the NPWS [National Parks
and Wildlife Service]. My understanding is that
Directives are decided by the EU and the imple-
mentation is here. Maybe it’s at EU level that it
needs to be explored a bit more.
►
What about the issues of countryside
pursuits?
Just again – Ciarán is dealing with the Dog
Breeding Bill. But when it comes to the Wildlife
Bill we will have to take a stance on that. We’re a
democratic Parliamentary Labour Party - that’s
how we make our decisions. I’m at the moment
listening to the different points of view, look-
ing at the issues with the Bill itself.
►
Incineration?
I’m worried about the approach hat has been
taken that it could be all consuming, that it will
compromise the strategic waste-management
plans. If it’s going to happen I think its some-
thing we should take very cautiously. I think
Dublin City Council was taking on board this
idea of an ever-growing economy. I think it’s
a strategy issue that should be controlled by
the state. I think the emphasis should be on
recycling. I certainly think there shouldn’t be
a mad rush towards incineration – the more
you incinerate the less goes into recycling. So
that’s the Labour Party’s position.
►
Finally, Climate change?
Climate change is Liz McManus [Liz McManus,
Spokesperson on Communications, Energy
and Natural Resources] but the more equality
you have within countries the better able you
are to tackle climate change. The idea that the
poor countries are worse – do something about
the fact they are poor.
I think environmentalists need to remember
that the issue is poverty, so I think that a core
value has to be the delivery of equality within
countries and across the world.
“I certainly think
there shouldn’t
be a mad
rush towards
incineration –
the more you
incinerate the
less goes into
recycling”