5 8
July-August 2018
T
HOUGH HARDLY a household name
today, English engineer and inven-
tor, Guy Callendar, is famous for
developing the theory linking rising
atmospheric carbon-dioxide levels
to global temperature. The so-called Callen-
dar effect is at the bedrock of modern
climatology. Ironically, Callendar, who died in
1964, thought this CO2-fuelled warming effect
would be broadly beneficial to humanity, as
it would postpone “a return of the deadly
glaciers”.
Callendars meticulous compilation of nine-
teenth-century temperature records and
cross-checking of them with old measure-
ments of atmospheric CO2 led him to the
novel conclusion that temperature increases
appeared to be driven by increases in CO2
levels. Not ever yone was convinced. The Brit-
ish Meteorological Society at the time
dismissed his results as mere coincidence.
In a letter to a colleague in 1956, Callendar
wrote: finally, a word of warning, based on
long experience, against the pronouncements
of meteorologists on climate change. The
latter are usually obsessed with regional uc-
tuations of air circulation which mainly
influence local short-term trends, and do not
readily comprehend the controlling impor-
tance of atmospheric radiation for world
climate trend. The fluctuations of local ten-
year averages make a poor indicator of the
latter!”.
In 2015, ahead of the Paris climate summit,
the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO)
invited national met services to prepare a
weather report from the year 2050” as a
hypothetical exercise. Ireland was repre-
sente d by Evelyn Cu sac k . Her shor t two-minute
bulletin is revealing.
Will there be any change in our weather
patterns (by 2050)? Well, there are many spec-
ulations. Some think it’s going to turn more
stormy, that we’re going to get more rainfall,
more flooding events, perhaps more droughts.
Perhaps it’ll turn warmer, perhaps even
colder, as the Gulf Stream gets turned off.
Casting her mind forward to 2050, Cusack
added: “it really is impossible to estimate.
Climate models really are in their infancy.
Predicting the exact weather on, say, Septem-
ber 23, 2050 is, as Cusack says, impossible.
However, the underlying climate signal is
absolutely unequivocal.
The WMO, of which Met Eireann is a
member, have no compunction whatever in
attributing current severe weather events to
climate change. Scientic assessments have
found that many extreme events in the 2011-
15 period, especially those relating to extreme
high temperatures, have had their probabili-
ties over a particular time period substantially
increased as a result of human-induced cli-
mate change by a factor of 10 or more in
some cases”.
The WMO report added that, of 79 studies
between 2011 and 2014, more than half
found that anthropogenic climate change con-
tributed to extreme events. The most
consistent influence has been on extreme
heat”.
Cusack did allude in passing to one poten-
tial climatic game-changer in the decades
ahead, which is the possibility of the Gulf
Stream switching off. This, in the words of
former chief Nasa climatologist, Dr James
Hansen, would mean that “all hell would
break loose in the north Atlantic, with the
sharply increased temperature gradient
between the tropics and the northern hemi-
sphere fuelling savage super-storms.
A study published earlier this year in
‘Nature Climate Change’ projected that more
than a quarter of the Earths surface will be
in the grip of permanent drought and deser-
tification by 2050, with global average
temperatures likely to rise by a catastrophic
C within the next 32 years.
Yet, when pressed on RTÉ radio as to
whether there was anything in any way unu-
sual about this summer’s record drought, the
best Cusack could do was to repeat: its just
variabilitytwice. I challenged this state-
ment on social media, and my comments were
picked up by the
Sunday Times
, which ran a
story headed: ‘Met Eireann’s “climate denial”’.
Rather than addressing the issue, Cusack
instead rejected my critique as “ridiculous,
adding: John Gibbons is not an exper t on cli
-
mate”. This is of course true. I have never
pretended to be a ‘climate expertbut have
interviewed many of the worlds leading cli-
matologists, from Michael Mann and the late
Steve Schneider to Kevin Anderson and our
own John Sweeney, Conor Murphy and Kieran
Hickey.
There are many ne scientists and forecast-
ers working in Met Eireann, but I would
contend that they are grievously mistaken in
downplaying climate change or claiming that
climate modelling is so novel or tentative that
it cant possibly give us a clear picture of what
is coming fast down the tracks. This is dan-
gerously close to the kinds of narratives being
deployed by do-nothing advocates lobbying
for business as usual special interest groups.
We can and must expect more from our inde-
pendent meteorological service.
by John Gibbons
Equivocal Evelyn
ENVIRONMENT
Evelyn Cusack. Pic: Rollingnews.ie
'It's just variability'
Met Eireanns Evelyn Cusack has been slower
than the World Meteorological Organisation
to attribute current severe weather to climate
change
July 2018
5 9
2008 – 2018
Truth and
Accuracy
• Respect for Rights
• Privacy
• Children
Distinguishing Fact
and Comment
If you think the
Code has been
breached the Press
Ombudsman provides a
fast, fair and free complaints
handling process.
info@pressombudsman.ie
(01) 6489130 or LoCall 1890 208 080
www.pressombudsman.ie
This magazine has signed up
to the Press Council’s Code
of Practice which covers
Irish Magazines’ Commitment to
Responsible Reporting

Loading

Back to Top