
July 2021 27
protective hat on. Yet the PSNI insisted in all
its reporting, with an unexplained prescience,
that there is likely to have been a concussion
due to hitting his head.
If, as stated by PSNI Superintendent Muir
Clark, “In [my] 30 years in the police, this is one
of the most unusual missing person inquiries
that I have dealt with”, why was it not fully
investigated? If this case was so ‘unusual’ you
would expect an exhaustive police investiga-
tion pursuing every line of enquiry, yet the
police settled on conclusion of ‘no foul play’
and they quickly excluded all other lines of
enquiry.
Extraordinarily the coroner then stated that
Noah had a bump to his head that was so minor
that it would not cause an injury, when his head
injury of about 16cm in circumference was vis-
ible to the family.
Since he did not hit his head it would seem
reasonable that they would investigate the
possibility of an assault.
Why did the PSNI not straight away seal-o the
area between where Noah was last sighted,
and where he was found? Why were search
dogs (operated by volunteers in SARDA) on
standby but never deployed by the PSNI?
There were problems with the PSNI investi
-
gation even before Noah was found. This was
a missing child; it was totally out of character
for Noah not to be in contact, yet there was no
police search.
The search was being carried out by the
public and the Community Search and Rescue
(CSR). Although the support from the public in
searching for Noah was helpful, it was improper
for the police to allow thousands of people to
walk across and contaminate
a potential crime scene. Best
police practice would have
been to straight away seal-o
the area around where Noah
was last sighted, and for the
Police to be involved in the
control of the searches.
Search dogs (operated by
volunteers in SARDA) were on
standby but the PSNI never
sought their deployment.
Why were the bin lorries
emptied?
On the Tuesday morning,
while Noah was still missing,
in the densely populated area
of Northwood where he was
last sighted by CCTV, the
Council bin lorries were
allowed to empty bins though
a crime appeared to have been
committed. The family was
outraged by this as they had
asked for the ocers to pre-
vent the bins from being
emptied, to no avail.
Some of the child’s clothing was found in the
street but not all items have been retrieved: his
underwear, shorts, and ‘North Face’ raincoat
are missing.
It is strange that no-one has ever come for
-
ward to say they found or saw these items of
clothing.
Why did the PSNI decline requests from the
family to see the CCTV, saying the release of
any footage must comply with the National
Police Chiefs’ Council policy which govern this
process.
Is this really a legitimate reason to keep the
footage from a concerned and grieving family?
The family was shown a sequence of clips by
the PSNI and Coroner - no longer than four or
five seconds each at a rough estimate - from
22 cameras, some of which were dashcam, res-
idential and private cameras.
One of the clips appears to be from a camera
belonging to Ulster University but strangely for
a camera that was so close and in a very bright
walkway on a summer afternoon, it is virtually
impossible to make out Noah in this clip
An argument could be that this is all the PSNI
have but then it was apparently clear enough
for the PSNI to surmise that Noah was not
attacked/approached by anyone and ‘left’ his
bag and laptop in the city centre.
Why did the PSNI not get CCTV images?
The family has since approached businesses
asking for them to share CCTV images. They
have been told that the PSNI did not request
these. When one business approached the
PSNI they were told that someone would be
down to collect as it could be significant. The
following day, the police attended the business
to say it was not necessary to take the CCTV as
what happened was a tragic accident.
Members of the public have also oered
dashcam that the PSNI did not appear to want.
Why have two people featured on CCTV not
been tracked down?
The family has revealed how minutes before
Noah was last seen, two potential witnesses
were picked up on a CCTV camera passing him.
These individuals have never come forward
to police.
In the CCTV there’s a silver car which turns
just as soon as Noah turns [onto Northwood
Crescent] and there is somebody at the top of
the CCTV that can be seen walking.
Why has the timing of Noah’s last sighting - on
the sections of CCTV chosen to be shown to the
family - changed three times to suit the PSNI’s
shifting narratives?
Considering the last time shown in the CCTV,
it is extremely questionable when Noah had the
time to remove his clothing and place some
items neatly on a wall.
One house in the area that
Noah disappeared has six CCTV
cameras covering three angles
but the PSNI has not requested
these.
Why will the PSNI not carry out
the necessary reconstruction?
However, no-one can be sure
of the timings of Noah’s journey
as the PSNI will not carry out the
necessary reconstruction to
confirm times or help jog memo
-
ries. In those circumstances the
family poignantly plan to do it
themselves.
The PSNI told the family that
they had distributed leaflets to
the houses in the area asking for
information. A local reporter
asked the PSNI for a copy (on
behalf of the family), but was
told that no leaflets existed and
obviously had not been distrib
-
uted. What really happened?
Who locked the drain and why
was it open in the 1st place? Has
How can the PSNI insist that
there is likely to have been
a concussion due to hitting
his head?