
7 6 July 2016
INTERNATIONAL
C
hina is going to reduce its per capita meat
consumption by half to help meets its com-
mitments under the Paris deal on climate
change. That’s how the Guardian newspaper
reported recently in a lengthy article that
quoted from a Chinese government nutrition guideline
published by the National Health and Family Planning
Commission which recommended that Chinese people
should restrict daily meat intake to 40-75g per day. That
compares to a 50-75g recommendation issued by the
same body in 2007.
The Guardian article, while quoting the 40g to 75g
recommendation but not the 2007 figures, suggested
“the Chinese government has outlined a plan to reduce
its citizens’ meat consumption by 50%, in a move that
climate campaigners hope will provide major heft in the
effort to avoid runaway global warming”. Should the
new guidelines be followed, it speculated, “carbon
dioxide equivalent emissions
from China’s livestock industry
would be reduced by 1bn tonnes
by 2030, from a projected 1.8bn
tonnes in that year”.
Sounds great, but where does
the 50% reduction comes from?
The Guardian quotes a Chinese
official, Li Junfeng, director gen-
eral of China’s National Center on
Climate Change Strategy and
International Cooperation (also
China’s head negotiator in Paris)
as saying: “Through this kind of
lifestyle change, it is expected that the livestock indus-
try will transform and carbon emissions will be
reduced’.
Really? A senior official like Mr Li should know his col-
leagues are pouring huge government resources into
increasing China’s consumption and production of
meat. An elite of enormous state-backed (and some
state-owned) firms, known as ‘dragon heads’, has been
consolidating China’s livestock industry along the lines
of their US, European and Brazilian counterparts.
Partly driven by government desire to improve food
safety and food security, and reflecting the US model,
‘consolidation’ is the watchword of government policy
for the meat industry, with ever-larger farms contracted
to or owned by meat companies.
One of these dragon heads – a company called the
Shuanghui Group owns Smithfield Foods, the biggest
pork processor in the US. Not surprisingly, American-
style pig meat products like barbecued pork are now
appearing on Chinese supermarket shelves and Shuan-
ghui executives and butcher crews fly back and forth
between Zhengzhou and Virginia for training.
Government-paid experts, principal among them the
China Animal Agriculture Administration (CAAA), a gov-
ernment-funded body charged with improving breeding
locally, are cheerleading the industry. The CAAA has
been embraced, indeed clutched, by international pro-
cessing, breeding, feed and veterinary medicine
companies which eagerly provide free advice and over-
seas trips to potential Chinese customers.
The average Chinese ate 3.7 kg of beef last year but
that figure should rise further says Xu Shang Zhong,
head of the China Beef Cattle Association. He cites
“bottlenecks” in breeding programmes and a “lack of
scale” among the challenges.
Meat consumption has jumped alongside rising
incomes in China where the term “meat eater” has long
been used to describe the wealthy. At 47.1 kg per person
China’s average per capita meat consumption is half the
equivalent figure in the US but is already reaching levels
seen in wealthier nations like Japan (35.5 kg) per capita,
according to the Organization for Economic Coopera-
China not in hand
A recent Guardian article was naïve
about China's aspiration to reduce its
climate-damaging meat production
and consumption
A senior official like
Mr Li should know his
colleagues are pouring
huge government
resources into
increasing China’s
consumption and
production of meat
by Mark Godfrey