
50 July 2022
By Kevin Kiely
O
N WHAT grounds is Joyce owed an
apology? Is he not lauded as a literary
genius? Are there not international
celebrations, monuments, and
institutions founded in his name?
Has he not respect and honour enough? The
answer is no – and after a hundred years of
pretending otherwise, it’s time to finally face the
facts.
There are many reasons why Joyce is owed an
apology: his isolation and exile, his abject
poverty, his ultimate prostitution to the
publishing and tourist sectors ironically backed
by his vilification and lack of recognition in Irish
media during his actual lifetime. The most
extreme example of this last is the burning of a
thousand copies of Dubliners at the behest of a
publisher and printer in Jervis Street, Dublin.
Despite later denials by Maunsel & Co., Joyce
insisted on the reality that the book had been
burnt and left Dublin that same day with Nora
Barnacle and their two children, never to return.
The burning of ‘Dubliners’ signified for Joyce
his rejection by Ireland, and the lack of coverage
for this abhorrent auto-da-fé is only one of the
many glaring biographical inaccuracies (and
omissions in feelgood biographies) in accounts
of Joyce’s life.
Joyce left Ireland but he remained Irish. He
was a Parnellite, an admirer of Grith and his
Sinn Féin. His manifesto was stated by Stephen
Dedalus in ‘A Portrait of the Artist as a Young
Man’: “I will tell you what I will do and what I will
not do. I will not serve that in which I no longer
believe, whether it calls itself my home, my
fatherland, or my church: and I will try to express
myself in some mode of life or art as freely as I
can and as wholly as I can, using for my defence
the only arms I allow myself to use — silence,
exile, and cunning”.
Dedalus will not serve but he does not
foreswear — and of course, he is a young man,
and not Joyce. It is complicated though: on the
verge of the German entry to Paris in 1941, an
ocial at the Irish legation repeatedly oered
Joyce and his son Georgio Irish passports, which
would have allowed them to leave occupied
France when they wished. The oers were
declined, and Joyce “clung doggedly to his
British passport”. — all of which led inevitably
to Bruce Arnold in ‘The Scandal of Ulysses’,
claiming that “Joyce was neither British nor Irish,
practically and emotionally”.
Arnold, an Englishman in exile in Ireland, may
not be well-attuned to the national question. To
his credit, however, more generally Arnold
challenges the so-called definitive Joyce
biography by Richard Ellmann for its weaving of
fiction (namely ‘Ulysses’) with facts. Ellmann’s
is “a biography that will tell us what can and
what cannot be determined as actually having
existed outside Joyce’s works”. Ellmann falls
short, losing himself in exegesis to the detriment
of his biography. An under-recognised disservice
to the great man.
Of course, Joyce grew up with an alcoholic
widower father who was on the way down, and
who moved house eighteen times in Joyce’s
childhood, was in perpetual debt and ill-
equipped to rear his ten children, five of whom
died in infancy. Joyce, a socialist, took on the
tradition with no relish and famously remained
in debt his entire life, and particularly to his
family.
Our greatest writer, the toast of our oleaginous
tourist industry, was so marginalised that he
wrote his masterpiece in dire poverty. Joyce
refers to life in Trieste in his personal letters:
“Clothes: I have none and can’t buy any…I wear
my son’s boots (which are two sizes too large)
and his casto suit which is too narrow in the
should.” Wyndham Lewis and T. S. Eliot brought
a parcel from Ezra Pound in London to Joyce. In
Lewis’s ‘Blasting and Bombardiering’ we are
told of how Joyce opens the parcel to find
secondhand boots.
Joyce’s real worry wasn’t footwear, however,
but sucient patronage to live on. Pound
begged John Quinn, the New York lawyer to give
Joyce support after Edith Rockefeller McCormack
had endowed his rent for a year in Zurich during
the writing of ‘Ulysses’. At Rue de l’Université in
Paris, the twentieth address at which part of the
book was written by this atavistic peripatetic,
he completed the greatest novel of the twentieth
century while sitting on the side of his bed
“without a desk, without books”. After years of
poverty, stress and strain, Nora Barnacle left
him and took her two children to her family in
Galway — for a while.
Another dishonour done to Joyce, which his
biographers are all too happy to gloss over, and
which I believe I am publishing for the first time,
is the fact that the predecessor to University
College Dublin, humiliatingly failed him in his
final examinations in…English.
As a graduating student “he had done well
enough to pass,” according to Ellmann.
However, his marks in English were 344 out of
800, where the passing mark was 400. This
would be like Einstein failing physics (which,
despite persistent urban legends, he never did).
Joyce obtained his degree only by a narrow
complimentary pass, due to his score of 465 in
French and 417 in Italian. UCD’s examination-
correcting system must have grossly
misinterpreted his final year paper in English for
the BA.
Joyce was clearly academically capable, as
demonstrated by the lectures he gave to the
Former Royal University of Ireland, Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin (left of photo): UCD owes apology
for failing Joyce in English in his final exams.
One word is due to our
greatest master of prose