
36 February 2016
Social welfare
Report Card
by Michel Smih
J
obseeker's allowance, jobseeker's
benefit, the one-parent-family parent
payment and disability benefit. are
the key welfare payments provided
by the State. They were reduced dras-
tically between 2009 and 2011-12 and have
been frozen since then. To restore these core
welfare payments to their 2009 level, taking
account of inflation, would require an increase
of at least €27 per week for a single adult and
€40 per week for a couple.
Although core benefits have been main-
tained, almost everything else has been
reduced.
Up to Budget 2015 there have been four
budgets, with a net reduction to the social pro-
tection budget of almost €900m. Of all the
budgets, only one saw an expansion of welfare
spending: Budget 2015 saw a €198m increase
in welfare funding, still less than the €226m cut
of the previous year. Overall, there has been a
net reduction of spending on social welfare of
4.5% since Joan Burton took over.
More generally, Budget 2016 was the fifth
regressive Budget in a row. While it was not as
regressive as in previous years and contained
some gain for everyone, there was much more
for the wealthier and far less for poor and vul-
nerable people.
While single unemployed people will gain
€95 a year, single people earning €75,000 will
gain almost ten times as much i.e. €902. In the
case of couples, the unemployed will gain €157
a year while a couple with two earners on
€125,000 a year will gain nine times as much
i.e. an extra €1,408 a year. Budget 2016 wid-
ened the rich-poor gap by €506 a year. This
measures the gap between the disposable
income of a single unemployed person and a
single person on €50,000 per annum. If com-
pared with people on higher salaries the
rich-poor gap has widened even more (cf. p.9)
The rich/poor gap has widened by €1,003 in
two years as a result of this government’s
budget decisions.
The reality of budget 2016 is that a single
unemployed adult will gain €95 per annum,
while a single person earning €75,000 per
annum will gain €902. An unemployed couple
will gain €157 per annum, while a couple jointly
earning €125,000 per annum will gain €1,400
per annum.
In 2012 under Pathways to Work labour-mar-
ket ‘programmes’ (eg in-work benefits, job
creation programmes, placement services,
training and counselling) they were strength-
ened and made mandatory, and benefits were
made more clearly dependentl on job-seeking
efforts and engagement with social welfare ser-
vices. Non-compliance of any sort can result in
sanctions – a reduction of €44 per week or a
cessation of payment for up to 9 weeks. For
instance, refusing to take an internship can lead
to this form of punishment.
The Department of Social Protection has con-
tracted two private companies to deliver
JobPath.A British recruitment firm, Seetec, has
been contracted to deliver these activation ser-
vices in the north of the country and Dublin. An
Turas Nua, a consortium of Irish-based
recruitment company FRS and the UK company
Working Links, will run the programme in the
south of the country. It is understood that each
contractor must service 25,000 long-term
unemployed people a year in their search for
employment. They will do this through a supply
chain of sub-contracted local, private and not-
for-profit, specialist organisations.
We need more scrutiny on the motivations
behind this decision and its possible conse-
quences. The explicit driver for this partial
privatisation of Irish public employment ser-
vices is the inability of existing public services
to support large numbers of long-term unem-
ployed people back into the labour market.
However, we need to be mindful that, else
-
where, such privatisation has been at least
partially motivated by the desire to implement
sanctions-driven ‘pay by result’ regimes which
many public-sector and not-for-profit organi-
sations have been reluctant or unable to
deliver. Activation policy now appears to be
moving towards a ‘work first’ model that
stresses job-search assistance with less
emphasis on education and training. In many
similar ‘work first’ and ‘pay by result’ régimes
the most vulnerable of welfare claimants
(people experiencing literacy, homelessness,
addiction, domestic-violence, and mental
health issues) are the most likely to experience
sanctions. Activisation policies have been
popular in the USA and Scandinavia since the
1970s; and have been warmly embraced by
Merkel in Germany and Cameron in the UK.
2016 ELECTION
"C"
"kept core benets but
regressively reduced
much else"