
6 April 2017
NEWS
before January 1st, 2012, and €172,710 for those
appointed after that date. This means that the
take-home pay of a High Court judge appointed
before 2012 is 38 per cent down on that paid in
2008, though, DV, it will revert to pre-2012 rates
in due course. For new entrants, the reduction
was 50 per cent.
Recent Council of Europe and European Com
-
mission surveys show that Irish judges are the
rarefied fifth best-paid in Europe. Nevertheless,
sure enough, many down the Law Library have
taken to sniggering at the calibre of some recent
appointments, some even did so on the record
for Gallagher. Villager would say, like the myth
of sunny summers in one’s youth, the quality
was actually never supereminent. We need only
look for example to the poor quality of judicial
tribunals, most of which simply failed to get to
grips with the facts, down the years.
Of course the central issue is that if “big hit
-
ters” did not earn so much in the first then
elevation to the bench wouldn’t disappoint them
so.
Judges besieged
While McDowell won’t have endeared himself to
any recent judicial appointments he’s usually a
safe pare of political hands for the judiciary. He
told the Seanad in January that the Republic was
the only state in the common law world in which
a government had ever proposed having a lay
majority on a judicial advisory board.
“It is of some significance that such a change
has not been proposed in America or anywhere
else with a common law system”, he said. Now
Villager would put it the other way: no jurisdic
-
tion he can think of has a majority of lawyers on
a judicial advisory board. The US Senate Judici
-
ary committee of course is political.
Judges betrayed
Meanwhile the Village editor is serving as a
‘judge’ [sic] on the ‘Law Awards’ again this year,
for some reason, one of which certainly cannot
be that the organisers ever read the vitriol
poured out on his pages about the legal profes-
sion on which he notably made no professional
mark.
On the record (mostly not about
judges)
Why is Shane Ross so unpopular with the media
who’re usually forgiving of the colourful in a
world of the drab? Diarmaid Ferriter in the Irish
Times even described him as “dossing” on the
job. Villager was dwelling guiltily on his weak
-
ness for Ross who in the end has squeezed the
establishment-fetishising Fine Gael party to get
a lay majority and chair on the new Judicial
Appointments Commission (now gratifyingly
supported by the Law Society), and who has
been dutifully obstreperous on drink-driving.
But then he was reminded of Doss’s laurels for
Irish Finance Minister Charlie McCreevy: a "bril
-
liant minister in the boom years"; his paeans for
Anglo’s Seanie Fitz who he felt should have been
interviewed for the top position in Bank of Ire-
land: "far too dynamic"; and for Sean Quinn: this
genius... [who] has combined being a champion
of the customer with making a mint”.
Worst of all, in an interview with the Evening
Herald in August 1983, the then bumptious
young senator stated that the “presumption of
the innocence of the Birmingham Six has been
taken for granted for too long” and that Irish
people should “cease their persistent criticisms
of the workings of British courts whenever Irish
-
men are on trial”. Too often, he said, Irish people
complained about the Birmingham Six, Guild
-
ford Four, the Maguire Seven and the Winchester
Three from positions of “ignorance and emo-
tion… I would like to put on record that I do not
believe for one moment that all these people
– leaving out the Winchester Three for the
moment – are automatically innocent. It seems
that all you have to be is an Irish person in Brit
-
ain charged with a terrorist crime for politicians
on all sides here to throw up their hands and call
'foul'. This is completely wrong”. The Birming-
ham Six, Maguire Seven, Guildford Four and
Winchester Three were all exonerated after
being wrongly jailed for years.
RIP, David Slattery
Villager was sad to hear of the death of David
Slattery, Conservation Architect, a charming and
gregarious character. Best known for his sensi-
tive supervision of the restoration of the Custom
House in the early 1990s, when he worked for
the OPW, he soon went into private practice and
the lucrative market in giving expert advice
about how a particular, inconvenient historic
structure was “a poor example of the type” and
should be demolished. Once described by the
Irish Times' Frank McDonald as Ireland’s leading
conservation architect (an epithet that inflamed
the OPW’s Freddie O’Dwyer whose erudition and
role better equipped him for the accolade) in an
article titled ‘Keeper of the Past’, he wrote off
buildings from the Westin on College St to most
of what was ultimately made a wide-ranging
national monument on Moore St, to 88 Thomas
St, to Liberty Hall, to the façade of O’Connell St’s
Carlton Cinema whose ‘moving’ he supported.
Though sniffy about ‘facadism’ (demolition
behind retained façade) and often fastidious
about treatment of first-rate buildings, where
required he was biddable in the service of high-
paying developers who needed a report to justify
a demolition to An Bord Pleanála or to disdain a
Local Authority’s proposed ‘listing’.
He was also involved in conservation works
on major schemes including the Bank of Ireland
and Dublin’s GPO, where the quality of work
tended to be excellent.
Shane Ross: unpopular
Birmingham Six