
March 2016 4 1
W
hatwasRichardBrutonthinking
ofwhenhereferredtosettingup
a“worldclass”service,toestab-
lishinganewentitythatis“all
aboutmaking Irelandthebest
small country to do business in”, when he
launcheda“neweraforemploymentrightsand
industrialrelations”?Theanswer,surprisingly,
istheWorkplaceRelationsCommissioninsti-
gated last October with a cacophony of
overblownrhetoric.Withallthefuss,itcomes
asasurprisewhenthis“worldclass”service
saysitcan’tadjudicateonsomeoftheequality
caseswithinitsremit.
Itrecentlystateditdidnothavetheresources
todealwithcasesofdiscriminationbyland-
lords against tenants in receipt of rent
allowance.KieranMulvey,itsDirectorGeneral,
was quoted as suggesting “We are not the
appropriatebodyforthis,thisisnotawork
-
place issue”. This is troubling given the
Workplace Relations Commission is in fact
boundtoadjudicateoncasesinabroadrange
ofeldsbeyondtheworkplace,undertheEqual
StatusAct,
Itisindicative,however,ofadeepermalaise
with the Workplace Relations Commission.
RichardBrutondidadd,withpride,thatthis
new“worldclass”servicewaslaunchedwith
20%fewerstaffand10%lessmoneythanits
predecessororganisations”.Whodidhethink
hewasfoolingwithhisinatedverbiage?
TheWorkplaceRelationsCommissionwas
establishedinOctober2015throughthemerger
ofveorganisations:theEqualityTribunal,the
National Employment Rights Agency, the
EmploymentAppealsTribunal,theLabourRela-
tionsCommission,andtheLabourCourt.The
EqualityTribunalhadbeenakeypartofthe
equalityinfrastructureandsitsuncomfortably
inthisnewentitywithamandatethatstretches
beyondemploymentrightstodiscriminationin
theprovisionofgoodsandservices,education,
andaccommodation.
TheEmploymentLawAssociationofIreland
(ELAI)isnotimpressed.Theyraisedsomefun-
damentalissuesinaFebruary2016submission:
abouttheadjudicationofcasesandthecompe-
tency of the adjudication officers, the
pre-hearingprocessandcomplaintsubmission,
andmediation.
TheELAInotethattherulesofprocedureof
theWorkplaceRelationsCommissiondonot
addresshowhearingsaretobeconducted.It
identiesconcernsamongitsmembersthat
“thereis inconsistency in how Adjudication
Ofcersapplybasicrulesoffairprocedure;for
example,thepermissibilityofcross-examina-
tionandtheapplicationofrulesofevidence”.
Casesareheardinprivateandtheredoesnot
appeartobeanymonitoringofdecisionsby
AdjudicationOfcers.TheELAIisconcerned
thattherules“donotguaranteeusers’consti-
tutionallyprotectedrighttoafairhearing”.
Itisfurtherconcernedthatthe“framework
forappointingandtrainingAdjudicationOfc-
ersissubstandard”.Thereisnoclarityastothe
qualicationsorexpertiserequiredofAdjudica-
tionOfcersorwhattrainingtheyget.Thisis
damninggiventhebroadspreadofcasesthey
nowhavetodealwith.TheELAIsuggeststhere
hasbeena“dilutionofexpertise”fromthespe-
cialisationthathaddevelopedamongstaffin
thepredecessorbodies.
RichardBrutonmademuchoftheimportance
ofmediationincasesconcerningemployment
rights.Itwouldappear,however,thatthemedi-
ationserviceisunder-resourcedandcannot
meetdemand.
Itbecomeseverclearerthatthisisnotaser-
vice set up to be “world class” but to save
money.TheELAInotesthatsomeofitsmem-
bersrecountinstances“wherebothpartiesto
adisputehaverequestedmediationbutthat
requesthasbeenrejectedbytheWRC”.
TheELAInotesthatwhilemostcomplainants
arenotrequiredtodetailthesubstanceoftheir
complaintwhenitisbeinglodged,“exception-
ally,complainantsmustprovidesubstantive
detail for allegations of discrimination and
constructivedismissal.”.Theguidancegivenby
the Workplace Relations Commission for
employeesmakingacomplaintofdiscrimina-
tionrequiresthat“thecomplainantmustsetout
thefacts,thelinkbetweentheground(s)cited
andtheallegeddiscrimination,anyotherrele-
vantinformationand,whereappropriate,any
legal points the complainant may wish to
make”.
UndertheproceduresoftheformerEquality
Tribunalsuchastatementwasonlyrequired
whensubmissionswererequestedsometime
afterthecomplaintwaslodged.Theapproach
oftheWorkplaceRelationsCommissionmakes
itmoredifcultforcomplainantstolodgeacase
ofdiscrimination,increasestheneedforlegal
representationatanearlystagewithadditional
costs,andreducesaccesstojustice.
Thisisonlytherstyearofoperationofthe
WorkplaceRelationsCommission.Thereisstill
time togetitright.However,it isclear that
urgentactionisrequiredtoensurepeopleare
able to vindicate their rights. As paid work
becomesevermoreprecariousandasdiscrimi-
nationpersistsathighlevels,theweakeningof
ourrightsinfrastructureinthiswaymustmust
notbeaccepted.
Its approach makes
it more difficult for
complainants to lodge
a case of discrimination,
increases the need for
legal representation
at an early stage with
additional costs, and
reduces access to justice
World Crass
The new Workplace Relations
Commission has weakened the rights
infrastructure regarding landlords
and there are problems with funding,
procedures, fairness and expertise
OPINION
by Niall
Crowley
EGALITARIAN
THE