
6 4 April 2017
CULTURE
were an exalted cast among the áes dána (skilled
people). They were not clerics although, some of
their education overlapped with priests’. In a
highly stratified society they painted themselves
as equal to kings. They were also legal authori-
ties in a society spared full-time lawyers. As
masters of language – and performance perhaps
– they shaped the outlook of their audiences;
They were more or less Percy Shelley’s “unac-
knowledged legislators”.
These Irish poets learnt their trade, often
operating under exacting metrical demands.
According to Williams: “They were expert in
grammatical analysis … in the highly formalised
rules of poetic composition, and in training the
memory to encompass the vast body of histori
-
cal and legendary story, precedent, and
genealogy which it was their business to know”.
Pagan gods and lore were their discreet pre-
serve, conferring deep awareness of the native
language and landscape, although, as Williams
stresses, they were not atavistic pagans.
The Romantic inspiration for the Revival of
Irish mythology at the end of the nineteenth cen-
tury is significant. Yeats, especially, was
influenced by Romantics and pre-Raphaelite
poets of a previous era, foremost perhaps Shel-
ley who saw poetry as the font of wisdom and
extensively mined Classical mythology for meta-
phor and inspiration. In his essay ‘The
Philosophy of Shelley’s Poetry’ (1900) Yeats
refers to the “ministering spirits” for the former’s
poem Intellectual Beauty: “who correspond to
the Devas of the East, and the Elemental Spirits
of medieval Europe, and the Sidhe [sic] of ancient
Ireland”. In quoting that poem he reveals the sig-
nificance of the síde to his own Art:
“These are ‘gleams of a remoter world which
visit us in sleep,’ spiritual essences whose shad-
ows are the delights of the senses, sounds
‘folded in cells of crystal silence’, ‘visions swift,
and sweet, and quaint,’ which lie waiting their
moment ‘each in its thin sheath, like a chrysalis,’
‘odours’ among ‘ever-blooming Eden trees,’ ‘liq-
uors’ that can give ‘happy sleep,’ or can make
tears ‘all wonder and delight’; ‘the golden genii
who spoke to the poets of Greece in dreams’;
‘the phantoms’ which become the forms of the
arts when ‘the mind, arising bright from the
embrace of beauty,’ ‘casts on them the gathered
rays which are reality’; ‘the guardians’ who move
in ‘the atmosphere of human thought,’ as ‘birds
within the wind, or the fish within the wave’”.
Yeats, however, felt, “Shelley’s ignorance of
their more traditional forms, give some of his
poetry an air of rootless poetry”.
Yeats identified himself with Ireland (as
opposed to England where he spent much of his
early life), finding here vibrant and novel mysti
-
cal sources for his poetry, containing symbols
he considered universal. His Ireland was a
Romantic illusion coinciding with a doomed
attraction to Maud Gonne whose intense
nationalism bewitched him. Building on the work
of Standish O’Grady and others, he and his
friends, the journalist and visionary George Rus-
sell and the folklorist Augusta Lady Gregory,
developed a pantheon of Irish gods mirroring
Classical and, importantly, Hindu, models. In
Yeats’ view: “Tradition is always the same. The
earliest poet of India and the Irish peasant in his
hovel nod to each other across the ages, and are
in perfect agreement”.
As with the early period of Christianity, the
nourishment of other traditions, Neoplatonic
and Oriental, brought texture and colour to the
Irish gods. It is also telling that the leading Reviv-
alists came from Protestant backgrounds as that
tradition emphasises the malleability of immor-
tals ‘immanent in the landscape’. The Tuatha Dé
are equal-opportunities enchanters who make
no distinction based on race or creed, although
all should be beware of the amádan na bruidhne,
a supernatural being whose very touch brings
disablement and death. The fool in Ireland is not
always wise.
Importantly at this time, Yeats and his coterie
formed the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn
which served a role akin to the schooling of the
medieval filid. According to Williams: “Progress
up through the grades of the Golden Dawn was
via a series of initiations and examinations, each
of which required the initiate to master aspects
of occult symbolism and philosophy – a system
of considerable intellectual complexity”. It
seems that Yeats who never attended university
was alluding to the benefits of this formation
when he urged, “Irish poets learn your trade’, in
his valedictory ‘Under Ben Bulben’.
Largely owing to their identification with
heretical Protestantism and deviant theosophy,
the Tuatha Dé largely retreat from view after Irish
independence in 1922 and most schoolchildren
are unacquainted with the riches of the early
sagas which helps explain the continuing
decline in the fortunes of the Irish language. It is
revealing, however, that the determinedly cos-
mopolitan James Joyce proposed that James
Stephens, a prominent scholar of Irish myth,
should complete 'Finnegans Wake' should he
expire before doing so.
It is instructive that the retreat of mythology
from late-twentieth-century Irish literature coin-
cided with a loss of vividness and elements of
magic.
It is worthwhile recalling the views of the lead-
ing art critic of nineteenth-century Britain John
Ruskin who asserted a belief in “spiritual powers
… genii, fairies, or spirits”. He claimed that, “No
true happiness exists, nor is any good work done
… but in the sense or imagination of such pres-
ences”. This may have been meant in the sense
that we should preserve our ‘childish’ sense of
wonder into adult life. Williams suggests that a
mythology, “furnishes a culture with total world-
view, interpreting and mirroring back everything
that that culture finds significant”. It is a medium
that remains vitally generative in the creative
process allowing artists to imagine divine pos-
sibilities. Unfortunately its possibilities have
been tethered by a dunderhead scientism that
conflates all belief in the supernatural.
Scientism now operates in the same way as a
dogmatic Christianity when it ceased to express
ideas in the language of paradox. The location
of the Tuatha Dé and other Irish immortals is in
the unconscious mind, which is as real as any
other phenomenon.
John Moriarty is the latest writer to light the
torch of the Tuatha Dé in his ‘philo-mythical’ writ-
ings, dousing his work with characters borrowed
from Old Irish literature. His prose is gloriously
poetical although it is difficult to keep abreast of
the ubiquitous erudition. It is advisable to begin
by listening to recordings of Moriarity as he
explores the contours of his crooked world,
observing all ontologies and mythologies that
lie in the undergrowth. Unsurprisingly, the 2012
documentary about his life 'Dreamtime, Revis-
ited' was subjected to attack, with Donald Clarke
in the Irish Times describing it as a “priceless
parody of Celtic windbaggery”. The reviewer
acknowledged that he had never read any of
Moriarty’s formidable writings and evinced no
appetite to do so; preferring instead the cheap
humour of the amádan na bruidhne, and reveal
-
ing the empirical and utilitarian outlook that
reigns in our culture.
Mark Williams’ book is a tour de force of schol-
arship by any measure. Naturally there are
lacunae in a treatment that spans over a thou-
sand years, including an acknowledged omission
to integrate the gods of the 'Táin Bó Cualígne'
into his narrative. It may also have benefited
from further concentration on the social struc-
tures of early Christian Ireland and the
agricultural modes of production, and relations
with Nature, that underpinned these. The Tuatha
Dé exist in an Irish dreamtime that we dismiss at
our peril. Their presence remains etched into the
landscape as an undiscriminating fountain of
creativity that may help us unlock the most vivid
ideas.
Subtle tales are a corrective to the fatalistic
machismo of the character of Cú Chulainn
from the Irish epic ‘Táin Bó Cualígne', that has tended to
incarnate the nationalist self-image