
July-August
prominent role in decisive legal
actions at the hightest courts in
defence of Irish constitutional
rights, and his leadership in
campaigns against the adoption
of a succession of EU treaties
into Irish law. Even as we edi-
tors and the essayists combined
to fashion this festschrift, Tony
continues in the vanguards of
the Brexit and Irexit debates
and developments, and has
actively engaged with the
State’s Citizens’ Assembly on
the question of how referenda
can best be conduc ted in a dem-
ocratic manner”.
The essays
The book divides the 18 contributed essays into four groups. In
the first, ‘Assessing Anthony Coughlan’, his Danish friend MEP Jens-Peter
Bonde tells of their collaboration and occasional disagreement as they
dealt on EU matters with their respective national parliaments. Column-
ist Deaglán de Bréadún writes that, though he values Coughlan as a
thinker, he is more comfortable with his views on Northern Ireland – he
is referring to Coughlan’s active support for the Civil Rights movement
in its time – than on the EU. Professor Ray Kinsella, measuring Coughlan’s
republicanism against ancient Greek standards and those of Wolfe Tone
and Connolly finds it not wanting. And he declares Coughlan’s writings
on the EU, Brexit and Irexit entirely free of xenophobia.
In the second group, “Constitutional Imperatives” Patricia McKenna
narrates how, during the Maastricht Treaty referendum she won a case
in the Supreme Court to prevent the State again using public funds to
promote its preferred side in a referendum. Séamas O Tuathail tells his
story as a member of the legal team that acted for Raymond Crotty
during the victory in the Supreme Court, which ruled that ratification of
the Single European Act by the State required approval by referendum.
Finally in this group. Deputy Thomas Pringle recounts why he became
concerned that the European Stability Mechanism might transfer
significant financial control from Ireland
and the steps he took in the hope of pre-
venting this.
Eoin O Murchú
My eye is caught further down the line
by what looks like a profound essay by
Eoin O Murchú ‘Historical Roots of Our
Surrender to the New Imperialism’. Delv-
ing back into Ireland’s nineteenth-century
history, O Murchú points out that, unlike
most other European countries and the
North of Ireland, most of Ireland in that
century did not, could not, develop an
industrial, capital-owning bourgeoisie.
Then when Fianna Fáil in the 1930s spon-
sored semi-state-run industries in the
hope that this would lead to a growth of
private industr y, the State made the mis-
take of not breaking the link with Sterling
so as to have a self-managing Irish finan-
cial system. When we joined the EEC we
replaced as controlling power the Bank
of England with the European Bank. We
have not yet tried full independence.
Along with fulfilllng its festschrift role by publishing its eighteen
essays, the book contains a variety of other pieces long and short on
figures who have contributed to the anti-EEC movement; for example,
a piece on Ray Crotty’s contribution by Séamas O Tuathail. The book
presents the marching army of the anti-Brusseleers complete; a boon
to old friends, with many good photos of individual marchers
Looked at from another angle, we have in these pages a large amount
of the Irish political thought of the last sixty years; the part constitut-
ing a non-violent-nationalism directed against a new deprivation of Irish
sovereignty, this time by a composite Continental European power. It is
important to see this latterday intellectual and legal resistance in the
context of the proud history of Irish nationalism – a stance and resist-
ant action thrust upon us by refusals of neighbours - with the
collaboration sadly of some of our own – to let us simply manage our
own affairs in our own way.
Missing Populist Party?
Noting from the evidence of this
new book all the effort made
against this latterday imperialism,
one must also note its failure hith-
erto. Recent events on the Continent
show us that to make the Brussels
power or the accommodating home
power shift even slightly, you need
some frightening force. You need on
your side what respectable people
call a ‘populist’ party: a large
number of rough, angry people. Without that your objection to the pre-
vailing imperialism is dismissed as intellectuals pursuing an outdated
nationalism.
From 1976 to 1982 Dr Desmond Fennell taught History and Politics at
University College, Galway and from 1982 to 1993 English Writing at the
Dublin Institute of Technology. His book s and journalism have dealt with
Irish and international culture and politics, and with history, travel, reli-
gion and literature.
Lassitudinous
digging
Coughlan makes the
case for a Europe
of independent and
co-operating nation
states as the most
effective means to
impose social control
on private capital
and multinational
corporations
Ray Kinsella declares
Coughlan’s writings
on the EU, Brexit and
Irexit entirely free of
xenophobia