July-August 2024 51
Bitten by
Bitcoin
Progressives should embrace crypto as
opportunity-egalitarian and because they eliminate
the cut to the dollar-US, but they’ll need to get over
its capitalist associations
By Jillian Godsil
C
ryptocurrencies are virtual
currencies serving as a new
money.
Starting at the beginning:
not all crypto is created equal
and Bitcoin was the first and biggest, now
comprising about half of the market.
Others include Ethereum and Tether.
The eight-page White Paper for Bitcoin
was posted in a cryptography mailing list
in 2008 — at the beginning of the global
financial crash — by the confusingly
pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto and
came into being, when its first ‘block’ was
‘mined’, on January 3, 2009. The White
Paper noted that: “A purely peer-to-peer
version of electronic cash would allow
online payments to be sent directly from
one party to another without going through
a financial institution”. Nakamoto remains
elusive: If you were following a legal case
in the UK recently you might have
discovered that Australian scientist Craig
Wright is not Nakamoto despite all his
claims.
Bitcoin depends on blockchain
technology. Each blockchain block
contains information about the previous
block: forming a chain. Each additional
block links to the ones before it making
blockchain transactions irreversible since,
once they are recorded, the data cannot be
altered retroactively without altering all
subsequent blocks.
Bitcoin is a mathematically derived
digital currency. The scarcity is driven by
the fact that blockchain technology has,
embedded in its computer code, a strict
production limit of 21 million Bitcoins.
New Bitcoins are created by rewarding
cryptocurrency miners for completing the
complex computational functions
underlying the system’s cryptographic
technology. The creation of these new
coins and the validation of all transactions
is decentralised and relies on public
ledgers. Instead of a single authoritative
institution, such as a Central Bank
controlling the currency, Bitcoin is
validated by its participants on a peer-to-
peer basis. Every four years the reward is
halved and typically the price increases.
The last halving was at the end of April.
Blockchain operates as a digital ledger
of account which eliminates the need for
intermediaries, such as banks, to verify
the presence of assets. Blockchain also
eliminates the digital double spend which
can render digital transfer of assets
problematic and non-unique.
Blockchain technology has been around
since the late 1990s, but Bitcoin was the
first time it was used to underpin a digital
asset.
So it’s all driven by maths not people!
This is very important. The decentralised
nature of Bitcoin means that no one entity
has altered the course, or hacked the
protocol, or increased the number of
tokens. Many people have tried — as the
value of Bitcoin goes up — so too do the
attempts. People hear about Bitcoin being
hacked but in fact what is hacked is
cryptocurrency exchanges or personal
wallets.
A short history of modern money
systems points to the importance of this
integrity. Because fiat currencies (regular
state-sponsored money such as the dollar
or euro) are no longer linked to the gold
standard their rates vary and can be
manipulated. For example in 1992 George
Soros famously shorted Sterling out of the
European Exchange Rate mechanism,
netting an unethical billion.
After World War II, the American dollar’s
position as the global reserve currency
was institutionalised by the Bretton
Woods institutions and, through the
mechanism of the gold standard, became
the measure by which all other national
currencies were valued. This system had
many problems caused, in part, by the US
running large and persistent balance of
payments surpluses. Charles De Gaulle’s
government noted — because the rest of
the world had to sell goods and services
to earn dollars — that the US obtained
what it memorably called a privilège
OPINION
52 July-August 2024
Each additional blockchain block links
to the ones before it making blockchain
transactions irreversible since, once
recorded, the data cannot be altered
without altering all subsequent blocks
exorbitant.
In any case, this came crashing down
when President Nixon decoupled the
dollar from the gold standard in order to
pay for the Vietnam war and successive oil
crises. He did it by printing more dollars
— now commonly known as quantitative
easing — which has the eect of increasing
the money supply and simultaneously
reducing its value. If an individual did it, it
might be termed counterfeiting money.
I didn’t enter this space as a raving
anarchist and still don’t think of myself as
anti-government, but Bitcoin does make
you think about money and how it is made,
shared and earned; and, most importantly,
about who benefits: cui bono.
Recently I pitched a crypto story to a
local Irish financial broadcaster and I
quote the response here:
“If [NAME of PROJECT] uses
cryptocurrency I won’t cover it as it is not
a suitable product for small savers”.
This was unfair. The small investor is
much more likely to benefit when the US’s
advantage does not have to be paid as a
cut by the currency.
On the other hand it is certainly true, as
shown for example in a 2023 study by
Harvard Business School professor Marco
Di Maggio, that, on average,
cryptocurrency investors have higher
household incomes, live in wealthier and
more educated areas, like to gamble,
frequently use credit cards, and often
overdraw their checking accounts. And the
ordinary citizen is less likely to invest than
those individuals who can be described as
adventurist individualists. A 2022 article
in The International Review of Financial
Analysis, reviewing 59 million US
consumers, notes “a significant and
positive relationship between
individualism and Bitcoin activity”. No
doubt all this will be a negative for Village
readers, sceptical of capitalism and
individualism, but it is equal opportunity
and at least it is not providing a currency
premium to America just for being America.
The upper percentiles of richest people
can access famously better returns than
ordinary people. In the US, only accredited
investors can participate in, for example,
high-value IPOs where the returns are
much higher than high-street bank interest
July-August 2024 53
rates. Their accreditation depends on the
scale of the assets they own and their
money in the bank. In other words, only the
rich can benefit: a potential which has
nothing to do with knowledgeable investor
skills and everything to do with exorbitant
privilege. It is the very heart of the
complaint Thomas Piketty made about
how capital returns will always outrun
labour returns and so the wealthiest will
always get wealthier: the root of the
ascendancy of inequality.
We all live in a capitalist world but
cryptocurrencies are more egalitarian than
dollar-deferential fiat currencies.
So for the Village reader Bitcoin oers
transparency, integrity, a departure from
dependence on both the US and the
worlds richest people — and some degree
of fairness and equality of opportunity.
The fact that it is not anti-capitalism is
little to the point. Nearly nothing is.
Perhaps then the sceptical broadcaster
was concerned with crypto’s volatility. But
that is not intrinsic, and is certainly less
ingrained than the volatility of the US, all
it stands for, and its currency. And it is not
unfair to note that Bitcoin stands near an
all time high around 60,491.35, nearly
double its rate when the broadcaster
voiced concern and up 17% since this
article was first commissioned. For your
information, according to Nasdaq.com,
Bitcoin appears to be attracting an
unusual level of demand from bull traders
in the derivatives markets. This move
could propel Bitcoin into an upward
trajectory as June 2024 unfolds.
I am not blind: there are of course bad
actors in crypto but wherever there is
money there are people looking to make a
buck. Most of the cryptocurrency projects
are high-risk startups — some 90% will fail
for the usual bad ideas and bad execution;
and yes there are a fair complement of
chancers in the mix.
Nor am I mad about ‘crypto bros’
wagging their oversized wallets in a
testosterone fuelled display (early
We all live in a capitalist
world but cryptocurrencies
are more egalitarian than
dollar-deferential fiat
currencies
adopters tend to be predominantly male).
The arrogance can be quite overpowering,
like spiked aftershave, and I just want to
shout in their faces - you bought some
bitcoin early and didn’t manage to lose it
- well done!
To be fair, there are also many people
who bought early who had much more
philanthropic ideals such as providing
fresh water to disadvantaged communities
or helping women gain a financial
education to better help support their
families.
Another thing about Bitcoin is its
privacy. As we race to more and more
digital pathways from identity to payments
to grocery shopping habits, there is less
and less to keep private.
But I favour Bitcoin not any old cryptos.
Some are admittedly lethal like Central
Bank Digital Currencies when used the
way they are in China. They are
government-issued and -controlled
programmable money using blockchain
technology. In China, it is used as a rating
system allowing the Communist party to
decide literally what type of life is open to
you based on your spending, eating or
drinking habits.
Here in Ireland we learnt to our cost last
century that the separation of church and
state was not only advisable it was
necessary. It is the same about money and
state - we just haven’t as a collective
nation made that adjustment yet. We still
believe in Central Banks although they
have not been what we think since the
second world war.
I have outlined Bitcoin’s upsides and its
downsides are all ones shared with the
fiat currencies that we all, including you,
dear reader, use all the time. Time for
egalitarians to open their minds on
Bitcoin.

Loading

Back to Top