īīīVILLAGEīAugust/September īīīī
P
UBLIC sculpture in Ireland includes
many monstrosities that are heavy
and clumpy in their use of materials
and ultimately non-artistic. The heavy-
gang includes Edward Delaney, John Behan,
Rowan Gillespie and Conor Fallon, but there
are plenty of others.
Delaney is egregious; his āWolfe Toneā
and āThomas Davisā are part of street-lore.
Tone begat āTone-hengeā and Davis with
his attendant ļ¬gures, is āthe piddlers on
the Greenā.
They are objects of public derision, and
the critical establishment alone consist-
ently pays them homage.
Leading art critics RoisĆn Kennedy, Judith
Hill and Peter Murray never question the
numbing monolithic dullness. Murray has
claimed that Tone and Davis āconvey an
earthy solidity, a connection with the earth,
emphasised by their heavy legsā. Eamon
Delaney in āBreaking the Mouldā, a lengthy
paean to his father Edward Delaney, not sur-
prisingly supports Murray who eulogises
his Davis as representing āa farmer in from
the ļ¬elds: a man oļ¬ the bog and on to a ped-
estalā. The Davis statue does not reļ¬ect this,
nor does it invoke the Davis of history.
Eamon Delaney lauds his fatherās
āDavisā as superior to works by John Henry
Foley: āthere is none of the shrill theatre
of Grattan, or the arrogant certainty of
Burkeā.
This bludgeoning is untenable. Foley may
be eighteenth-century but his OāConnell,
Grattan, Burke and Goldsmith retain a
transcendent beauty, elegance, and imag-
inative artistry in execution, expression
and realism. Tone and Davis are excessively
bulky and heavy. Delaney quotes Aidan
Dunne who ļ¬nds Tone and Davis āfrayed
by mortality and uncertaintyā. But impreci-
sion is Dunneās actual medium: artspeak.
The problem is that in-depth criticism of
sculpture is nowhere found. The Irish Arts
Review and the Irish Times are not really in
the business of criticism. Circa, and maga-
zines like it, feature art and artists, exalted
and carefully ācriticisedā using quotations
from international art critics. Circaās pre-
sumption to interrogate is spurious. When
(recently) the magazine asked the question:
āWhat is the role and value of art criticism at
present?ā, it passed responsibility, by reply-
ing with a question: āWhat art?ā
Meanwhile, the RHA and commissioned
artists link arms, laughing all the way to the
pork barrel in this porcine climate of plas-
tic criticism.
You will not ļ¬nd any adverse critiques
of John Behanās āFamine Shipā that faces
Croagh Patrick where the heavy ghost-ļ¬g-
ures shrouding the three heavy masts are
what can only be honestly described as gate-
like. āThe Flight of the Earlsā (Rathmullan,
County. Donegal) with its three Irish chief-
tains on a gangplank of bronze, waving
āgoodbyeā is not evocative in any way of
this major historical event. Behan fails the
Famine as subject matter, and fails āThe
Flight of the Earlsā. He simply does not ļ¬nd
any artistic pitch that could be said to be
sublime, haunting, or even satisfying.
āThe Flight of the Earlsā was funded by A.J.
OāReilly and in general funding is plentiful,
boosted by the OPW and its capital fund. In
īīīī this amounted to ā¬īīī million. The
OPW has a design and project management
service for public-sector building, heritage
and art projects.
Arts Council payments to sculpture in
īīīī amounted to ā¬īīī,īīī. County coun-
cils play their part in commissioning public
works. The Per Cent for Art Scheme, since
īīīī, āapproves the inclusion in budgets
for all publicly funded capital construc-
tion projects up to ī% as funding for an art
projectā. The maximum for projects over
ā¬īī million is an art budget of ā¬īī,īīī.
Public sculpture is generally administered
by time-servers without a critical faculty,
people like the selection panels, the RHA,
and the artists who have lent their names to
the pervasive lugubriousness.
Alex Pentekās āRabbitā on the Ashbourne
Road (in Meath) cost ā¬īī,īīī and has no
distinguishing features whatsoever. In
essence it is a giant rusty rabbit that any
sheet-metal worker or gate-maker could
have designed far more subtly and much
more cheaply. Pentek is responsible too
CULTURE
Also in this section:
Review: āTickling the Palateā 50
In the sticks: Shirley Clerkin 52
Dairy stand-oļ¬ 54
Arts Council 56
Review: āSeeing is Believingā 58
Enduring Irish
sculpture
Heavy-handed and artless, though the critics
only ever coo. By Kevin Kiely
John
Behanās
āFamine
Shipā