March 2016 1 5
T
heIrishHumanRightsandEquality
Commission (IHREC) has just
launcheditsrstStrategyStatement.
This sets out an aspiration to be
“alignedtoanambitiousandcoura-
geousapproachtoequalityandhumanrights”.
Thereismuchthatispositiveandpromising,
however,therearesomeindicationsthatambi-
tionandcouragemightnotbesufcientlytothe
fore.
Oneofthevestrategicgoalsisthe“proac-
tive implementation of our legal powers, in
particularpublicduty”.Actionscommittedto
includeensuringthatduty-bearers
are more effectively held to
account.Thismustsurely
promise ambition and
courage.
But any sense of
ambition is tem
-
pered by the
limited aim of
duty-bearers:
“being measura-
blymoreawareof
theirobligations”.
Itisonethingtobe
awareofobligations,
anothertoactonthem.
Anysenseoftheimpera-
tiveofcourageistempered
becausetheclaricationandfur-
therdevelopmentofhumanrightsand
equalitylawisidentiedastheindicatorofsuc-
cess. Thisindicator suggeststhe IHRECwill
prioritiseitssupportforcasesdeemedstrate-
gic for its capacity to achieve new legal
interpretationsofthelawintheCourts.Amore
courageousapproachwouldhavebeentosup-
portacriticalnumberofcases,sufcientto
developandsustainacultureofcompliance
withthelawamongpolicymakers,employers
andservice-providers.
TheIHREClaunchwasaccompaniedbyan
extraordinarypressreleasefromInclusionIre-
land,thecivilsocietyorganisationpromoting
the rights of people with intellectual
disabilities.OnthebackoftheÁrasAttracta
scandalandvariousHIQAreportshighlighting
humanrightsabusesagainstpeoplewithdis-
abilitiesinresidentialsettings,ithadrequested
IHRECtoconductaninquiryintothecontinued
useofsuchcongregatedsettingsandtheinad-
equatepaceofde-institutionalisationofpeople
withdisabilities.ItnotedanInquiryhadbeen
requestedayearagoinFebruary2015without
response. This raises serious questions of
ambitionandcourageonthepartofIHREC.
TheemphasisonthepublicdutyintheIHREC
Strategyreectsimportantambition.Theleg-
islationthatestablishedtheIHRECin
2014 included a new duty on
public-sector bodies “to
haveregardto”eliminat-
ing discrimination,
promotingequalityof
opportunityandpro-
tecting human
rights in carrying
outtheirfunctions.
Thiswasadramatic
developmentinour
human rights and
equalitylegislation.
However,thispublic-
sectordutyhasyettobe
implementedtoanyextent.
Public sector organisations
havearguedthattheyawaitguid-
ancefromIHRECbeforefulllingwhatisstill
an obligation on them. The development of
guidance,supportsandactionbyIHRECtopro-
moteandenforcethepublic-sectordutywillbe
keytorealisingthepotentialinthisnewduty.
IHREC launch its Strategy in a context of
growinglevelsofeconomicinequality,poverty
anddeprivation.ItiscourageousthattheStrat-
egyplacesparticularemphasisonsocialand
economicrights.Actionscommittedtoinclude:
human rights and equality proofing budgetary
processes, “enhanced support for expanded
protection measures for socio-economic
rights”, and ensuring public awareness, under-
standing and support for socio-economic
rights. Thisactivitywillbecentraltoanyambi-
tiontocontributetofulllinghumanrightsand
achievingequality.
TheStrategyincludesagoalof“promoting
understandingoftheindivisibilityofequality
andhumanrights”.Humanrightsareindivisi-
bleinsofarasyoucannot cherry-pick which
humanrightsyouwishtorespect,protectand
full.However,thegoalappearstomisunder-
stand the difference between equality and
humanrights,andtoputatriskthechallenge
ofintegratingthesetwomandatesinamanner
thatisbenecialtoboth.
Theexperienceofintegratingthesetwoman-
datesinasinglebodyhasnotbeenpromising,
acrosstheEuropeanUnion.Thereisagrowing
practiceofmergingequalitybodiesandnational
humanrightsinstitutions.Thelanguage,tradi-
tion,andapproachofhumanrightshastended
to dominate in these merged bodies to the
exclusionofsomeoftheconcernsandambi
-
tionsforequality.Thelanguageofhumanrights
isalreadyover-usedintheIHRECStrategyand
thisdoesnotbodewell.
The Strategy establishes a concern for
“implementing and monitoring equality and
humanrights standards”.Human rights are
minimuminternationally-setstandards.Non-
discrimination is one of these standards.
Equalityis,sadly,notrecognisedassuchamin-
imumstandard.Equatingequalityandhuman
rightsinthismannerrisksreducingtheambi-
tionforequalitytotheminimumstandardof
non-discrimination.Equalityshould,however,
beaboutseekingmoresubstantiveoutcomes
ofeconomic,political,culturalandaffective
equalityfor individuals, groups and society
itself.
ThereisworktobedonebyIHRECinintegrat-
ingitsmandatesforequalityandhumanrights.
Otherwisetheambitionforhumanrightswill
compromisetheambitionforequalitythatmust
accompanyit.
A more courageous
approach would be to
support a critical number
of cases, sufficient to
develop and sustain a
culture of compliance
with the law among
policy makers
Equality and Human
Rights Commission
Ambition and courage are not to
the fore in the IHREC
by Niall Crowley
POLITICS