
1 2 March 2016
NEWS
T
heoptionofincreasingtaxondieseltocut
dangerousemissionswasdiscardedbythe
outgoinggovernmentamidconcernsofupset-
tingroadhauliersandincreasingthecostof
doingbusinessinIreland.
Asecondpossibilityofraisingcarbontaxonsolid
fuel was also ignored by then Minister of Finance
MichaelNoonanbecauseoffearsoversmugglingfrom
across the border and a possible rise in “fuel
poverty”.
Thetwooptionswerecontainedinapre-Budgetsub-
missionpreparedforFinanceMinisterMichaelNoonan
lastSeptember,whichhasbeenobtainedunderFree-
domofInformationlegislationbyVillage.
The submission on “energy and environmental
options”wasdiscussedinadvanceofBudget2016but
noneofthesuggestionscontainedwithinitwereacted
upondespitegrowingpressureonIrelandtomeetits
2020emissionstargets.
TheeconomiccostofairpollutioninIrelandhasbeen
estimatedbytheWorldHealthOrganisationat$2.5bil-
lionannuallybuttheDepartmentofFinancesubmission
suggeststhatpoliticalconcernsmayhaveplayeda
moreimportantroleinlastyear’sinternalDepartmen-
taldebate.
An Taisce said the decision not to make the tax
changesillustratedhowlittlepriorityhadbeenafforded
theenvironmentbytheoutgoing
government of Fine Gael and
Labour
CallsfromtheOrganisationfor
EconomicCooperationandDevel-
opment(OECD)for“equalisation”
ofexciseratesonpetrolanddiesel
weredisregarded,withtheDepart-
ment submission highlighting
potentially “strong opposition”,
particularlyfromroadhauliers.
The submission explained:
“Thereisasignicantdifferencebetweentheratesof
exciseonpetrolanddieselinIreland.
“Thisincreasedduringthe[economic]crisiswhen
increaseinexciseonmineraloilswereusedtoraise
revenuebutatthesametimeincreasesindieselwere
tempered inorder toprotect business as much as
possible”.
Thesubmissionsaidthatchangestovehicleregistra-
tiontaxandthedifferentrateshadnowincentivised
thepurchaseofdieselvehicles.
However,itexplained:“Itshouldbenotedthatdiesel
isadirtierfuelthanpetrolasemissionsalsoinclude
higherlevelsofnitrousoxidesandparticlematter”.
Itsaidthelowertaxrateondieselof48centperlitre
failedtotakeaccountofthe“socialandhealth”impacts
fromits useand madethreeproposals onhowthe
systemcouldbereformed.
Aplantoincreasetherateoftaxondieseltoequal
thatonpetrol(59centperlitre)wouldhaveyieldedan
extra€298millionayeartotheExchequer.
Theoppositeideaofreducingtaxonpetroltobring
itintolinewithdieselwouldhavecosttheState€172
millionannually.
Athirdidea–oflettingthetaxratesmeetathalfway
(53centperlitre)–wouldhavebroughtinanextra€65
millioninrevenueeachyear,thesubmissionexplained.
However, in the end the excise rates remained
untouchedwiththeexecutivesummaryofthesubmis-
sionexplaining: “Anyincrease inexcise[ondiesel]
wouldhaveanegativeeffectonthecostofdoingbusi-
nessintheState.
The Irish Road Haulier’s Association have cam-
paignedforareductionincostsandanyincreaseinthe
rate of excise is likely to be met with strong
opposition”.
Thesubmissionlaterexplainedthatthetaxrateon
diesel-5.5%abovetheEUaverage–alongwiththe
additionalcostsofbeinganislandstatewereaffecting
“Ireland’soverallcompetitiveness”.
JohnGibbonsofAnTaisce’sClimateChangeCommit-
tee said: “There is no justication for diesel to be
cheaper.Thissuggestionofhavingthetaxratesmeet
inthemiddlewouldhaveactuallygivenaprottothe
State”.
Proposalsforanincreaseincarbontaxwerealsojet
-
tisonedbytheDepartment.Thesubmissionexplained
thatthecarbontaxhadbeenextendedtosolidfuelsin
2012butwasnowcausingpeopletosourcefuelfrom
acrosstheborder.
Itsaid:“Arateincreasecouldleadtoanupsurgein
solidfuelsbeingsourcedfromNorthernIrelandand
furtherexacerbatetheissue”.
AnTaisce’sJohnGibbonssaiditwasabsurdfora
by Ken Foxe
Finance Department
favoured vested interests
over environment
FoI reveals official antipathy to raising
of carbon tax
It was absurd to be
setting policy on the
basis of the possibility
of illegal smuggling. We
do not apply this logic
to cigarettes