
6 October-Novemeber 2024
racist effect is through the process of social
categorisation, which divides communities
into ingroups and outgroups, assigning differ-
ent attributes and characteristics to each. In
hostile media coverage of migration, all
migrants are categorised as an outgroup”, The
Irish Network against Racism defines racism
as “any action…which has the effect (whether
intentional or not) of undermining anyone’s
enjoyment of their human rights, based on
their actual or perceived ethnic or national
origin or background, where that background
is that of a marginalised or historically subor-
dinated group”. Gript.ie implied the man was
part of an outgroup and undermined the man’s
right to be treated as an equal based on his
perceived Algerian nationality.
Here racism was merging with stirring up
hatred.
Sirring up Hred. John
McGuirk edis Grip, so if Grip
sirs up hred so does he
The reference to Algerian nationality, at a time
when the country was coming to terms with the
horror that was unfolding, was intended to,
and duly did, go viral, especially among a
cohort of Ireland’s well-known racists who, it
is impossible to deny, look to Gript for informa-
tion on occasions like this. These people are in
the business of being stirred-up and hatred is
their currency. It served to incite riots.
The man was, in fact, a naturalised Irish citizen
who came to Ireland from Algeria about 20
years ago. His country of origin was irrelevant
to his actions which appear to have been
rooted in severe mental-health problems.
The Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act
1989 states that it is an offence to communi-
cate threatening, abusive or insulting material
that is intended, or likely to, “stir up” hatred
against a group of people because of their
race, colour, nationality, religion, ethnic or
national origins. It seems probable the Tweet
stirred up racial hatred on the basis of national
origin — to imply the man may have carried out
his crime because of Islamism, that it was a ter-
rorist act. Or perhaps that this Algerian, like so
many of the immigrants of colour who Gript
covers, was more inclined to commit crime
than Irish people are.
Gript purveyed analogous racism and
stirred analogous hatred in a later piece, on 16
April, by ‘The Editors’ who pontificated about
the closing down of a meeting in Brussels: “A
Government that sides with those who
threaten to use force to silence their opposi-
tion...can barely even call itself western.
Indeed, we must consider the reality that the
Mayor of the division of Brussels who ordered
this decision is not of western heritage”.
Ethical journalism only reports the details of
a person because the details are relevant. There
was no relevance to the nationality of the man
who carried out the awful knifing in November
2023, and there was no relevance to the divi-
sional Mayor’s heritage not being western.
A few days later, Gript proudly teased
another McGuirk story ahead of publication.
A now deleted Tweet from McGuirk,
described the story which it ran under his
byline and which featured details of an Alge-
rian’s immigration history, as “quite a tale”,
while reporter Fatima Gunning suggested that
it would “rock A LOT of boats”. In fact it mainly
sank them.
After confirming receipt of confirmation
from the Garda that this new info was in fact
about a different Algerian. Gript reversed fast
but issued a statement threatening to reveal
its Garda sources, suggesting that it may have
been deliberately duped into publishing erro-
neous information.
There was no apology issued to the person
wrongly described in the article though he
spent time under Garda protection for his own
safety and was catastrophically defamed by
being imputed a child stabber. Unsurprisingly
he is now suing Gript for defamation,
Inevitably, while Gript did not explicitly
name the individual, it didn’t take long for far-
right factions online to fill in the blanks. Teeing
up others to identify someone is a recognised
head of defamation.
Parnell St is far from the only instance where
Gript has stirred up hatred. For example, on
26th November 2022 Gript tweeted in the
name of its editors: “Ireland’s migrant policy
is insanity and must be stopped - Gript; the
Editors: what we have seen, this week, is little
less than a political system at open war with
its own people. There is no room for the people
they are importing into the country”.
On 3 March 2024, the Press Council ruled
that “vulgar and aggressive language used by
Gript, as quoted by the Press Ombudsman,
was almost certainly intended, and certainly
likely, to cause grave offence to [the complain-
ant]. The Press Ombudsman had found the
cumulative effect of of such language was
“derogatory and intentionally offensive”.
On April 15 2024 Gript tweeted “NEWTOWN-
MOUNTKENNEDY The country feels like it’s at
boiling point. This cannot continue. The state
cannot keep using the Gardaí to batter through
a deeply, deeply unpopular immigration
policy, writes Niamh Uí Bhrian [who owns 50%
of Gript]”.
Use of inflammatory terms like “discrimi-
nated”, “playing”, “leapfrogged”, “insanity”,
“war”, “boiling point” and “batter” stirs
people up.
Contrasting migrants with “local people”
and “own people” and claiming state policy
favouring migrants is “deeply, deeply unpopu-
lar” trades in hatred.
On 19 January 2024 Fianna Fáil Senator
Malcolm Byrne asked the Press Council why
Gript was accredited by it and claiming we
have to be very concerned about news chan-
nels that stir up hatred; and on 13 March 2024,
Sinn Féin Senator Paul Gavin told the Seanad
“Gript deals with spite, hatred and lies”.
McGuirk’s Lies
So let’s look at a pattern of McGuirk’s mis-
takes, dishonesties and bare lies.
McGuirk lied to Young Fine Gael (YFG) in
2003 that Phoenix magazine wanted to publish
a piece about a salacious juxtaposition of YFG
material with material of a sexual nature by the
group’s equality officer, ensuring the unfortu-
nate young officer’s resignation.
His 2007 USI campaign featured lies that he
was on the boards of the Monaghan Youth Fed-
eration and the Irish Whale and Dolphin Group.
In 2009 McGuirk issued a deceitful press
release attacking the Simon Wiesenthal Centre
on behalf of one of his co-members of Libertas,
Caroline Simons, without any knowledge
whatsoever on her part.
In 2013, McGuirk tweeted that following a
profile of him in Phoenix magazine “they [The
Phoenix] paid for a nice holiday for me, from
the lawsuit”. The Phoenix rebutted this: “There
was no lawsuit; The Phoenix has never been
sued by McGuirk”.
During Ireland’s 2018 abortion referendum
campaign, McGuirk tweeted a photo of pro-
choice campaigners carrying posters featuring
the 1930s logo of the British Union of Fascists.
The posters had been handed out to unwitting
marchers by anti-abortion activists.
In March 2021, RTÉ had to pay €20,000 to
charity after, in an understandably rare appear-
ance on the station, McGuirk falsely claimed
Éirígí was responsible for the murder of jour-
nalist Lyra McKee.
In May 2021 Gript tweeted: “There has been
significant outrage in the Midlands after a
company run by Eamon Ryan’s nephew won a
contract to run a bike hire service in Offaly, win-
ning out over a local who had already been
doing the job for 11 years”. An incendiary cam-
paign lasted a few hours on Twitter. The story
was a lie and was eventually taken down.
On 16 March 2024, McGuirk posted a chart
on X that “oddly” showed that “the list of cities
with the most homelessness is also the list of
some of the most progressive and liberal cities
in the world”. In fact the chart, headed by
Dublin, was about the best homelessness
services.
We do not need to get into the issue as to
whether Gript, as opposed to McGuirk, tells lies.
Our piece in the spring was about John
McGuirk as much as about Gript.ie. In the opin-
ion of this magazine, Gript and McGuirk are
intertwined: McGuirk is a liar, racist and stirrer
of hatred; Gript is racist and stirs up hatred
with abandon.
VillageOctNov24.indb 6 03/10/2024 14:27