
rights and democracy.
The Irish secretary of the NUJ Seamus
Dooley said that the NUJ believed Ms
O’Doherty had been badly treated and
had a case for unfair dismissal. In a state-
ment, Transparency Ireland (TI) said that
Ms O’Dohertys dismissal could deter other
journalist from investigating abuses of
power, and called for her re-instatement.
TI also called for “the introduction of edi-
torial policies that protect the independence
of investigative journalists and editorial staff
at all newspaper groups in Ireland”.
Would Ireland instead be better off fol-
lowing a non-newspaper model? Outside
Ireland, investigative journalism has moved
out of traditional
media organisations
and into non-profit
organisations
funded by philan-
thropists (such as
the Center for Public
Integrity in the USA)
and publicly-funded
organisations such as
Mediapart in France.
Attempts to establish
one of these models
in Ireland, the Centre
for Public Inquiry
(where I worked dur-
ing its short existence), caused outrage even
among other news organisations, and con-
certed pressure by the then-government to
close the CPI suggested that the Irish estab-
lishment was quite happy with the status quo.
Moreover, academic and journalist Harry
Browne has argued that the philanthropic
model leaves public-interest journalist
organisations dangerously dependent on
one source of funding.
New models of organisation and fund-
ing will be among the topics of discussion
at upcoming conferences on investiga-
tive journalism in Dublin and London. On
October , the London Press Club will host
a conference with Alan Rusbridger, Andrew
Gilligan, Tom Harper, Heather Brooke and
Tom Bower, chaired by Andrew Neil. It is
being supported by polling company YouGov,
which will conduct a poll ahead of the
event.
The Dublin event,The Future of Investigative
Journalism in Ireland’ will take place at Liberty
Hall on November 23 and the panel will feature
journalist Frank Connolly, RTÉ Prime Time
journalist Rita O’Reilly, barrister Shelley Horan
and NUJ secretary Seamus Dooley, among
others. More information at www.ccrj.org,
www.SIPTU.ie.
I
T has been a mixed year for investi-
gative journalism. There are some
hopeful signs such as the imminent
introduction of legislation in Ireland
to protect whistleblowers. Internationally,
the US whistleblower Edward Snowden pro-
vided perhaps the story of the year, leaving
the public justifiably paranoid about their
personal data, and leav-
ing Snowden holed up in
Russia. With print revenues
continuing to collapse and
newspapers scrambling to
keep up with around-the-
clock digital media, the future
of print journalism in general
is precarious.
The dismissal of journalist
Gemma O’Doherty from the
Irish Independent during the
summer and the subsequent
non-scandal generated in
Ireland’s mainstream press is
instructive. The story of Ms
O’Dohertys sacking was initially reported in
the September issue of Phoenix magazine,
which reported that her investigation into
the wiping of penalty points from the record
of Garda Commissioner Martin Callinan,
which allegedly involved hassling him, (a
practice not unknown elsewhere in the
Independent group), had appalled executives
at the paper. The Phoenix reported that Ms
O’Doherty had been called a “rogue reporter,
and had subsequently been offered voluntary
redundancy. When she refused, she was then
made redundant, it said. Later broadsheet.ie
reported, though subsequently mysteriously
removed, news that penalty points had been
wiped after they were accrued by Stephen
Rae, Editor-in-Chief of the Irish Independent,
the Herald, and the Sunday Independent,
and former editor of the Garda Review. In
late September, the UK Irish Post more pre-
cisely reported that a car registered to Rae
allegedly accrued the points at .am on
November ,  at the N, Belfield,
Dublin, and the points were terminated.
The ethical difficulty for Stephen Rae
is that he was involved in the decision to
render Gemma O’Doherty redundant.
Roy Greenslade, Professor of Journalism
at City College London, wrote in the
Guardian that the dismissal of
Ms O’Doherty had been widely
ignored by the Irish mainstream
media. Greenslade’s story raised
a great hue among print jour-
nalists – outside Ireland. When
contacted by thejournal.ie, Ms
O’Doherty declined to comment
for legal reasons.Although the
story about Commissioner
Callinan was cited as the main
reason behind Ms O’Dohertys
departure, most reports recalled
Ms O’Dohertys diligent inves-
tigations into the  death
of Roscommon priest Fr Niall
Molloy that led to the reopening of the case
in . Writing in the Irish Independent
last year, Ms O’Doherty’s story on the case
opened with a quote from Labours John
Kelly telling the Senate that the Molloy story
was the “biggest cover-up in the history of
the State”. Ms O’Doherty went on to say that
her investigations had “exposed a litany of
damning evidence and glaring inconsist-
encies which point to nothing less than a
cover-up of staggering proportions, involv-
ing several institutions of the State and the
Catholic Church”.
Supporters of Ms O’Doherty, including
relatives of Fr Molloy and other murder
victims who felt badly treated by the police,
protested outside the Irish Independent
offices and wrote a letter to editor-in-chief
Stephen Rae claiming: As Irish citizens
we see her dismissal as nothing less than a
grotesque attack on press freedom, human
Few in Ireland care or notice when investigation
is scuppered. By Ronan Lynch


O’Doherty’s
dismissal has
been widely
ignored by
the Irish
mainstream
media
Gemma ODoherty
goes way of Centre
for Public Inquiry
gemma O’dOherTy NEWS

Loading

Back to Top