
2 8 July
the Garda about IRA weapons found on his land.
The first two pieces of Fulton’s evidence were
hearsay, but the Oliver allegation was Smith-
wicks' only piece of direct evidence of collusion
of any sort, by anybody, with the IRA after years
of public and private hearings. It is this evi-
dence, vehemently denied by Corrigan, which
was the subject of the statement by the Tribunal
that brought the Judicial Review to a halt and
removes the taint of involvement from
Corrigan.
But Smithwicks’ initial acceptance of Fulton’s
evidence, about Corrigan and Oliver, ran
directly contrary to evidence delivered to Smith-
wick from the PSNI and the UK Security
Services, in May and October 2012. Smithwick
stated, with apparent satisfaction, that the Tri-
bunal was in a unique position as it was
receiving evidence and co-operation from the
Northern and UK authorities. However, he
ignored or downplayed this evidence in his
report. Anyone reading the report must work
hard to find the details of this.
Everyone, including probably you dear
reader, thinks the Smithwick Tribunal was
about collusion, which everybody thinks it
found, but ultimately not one allegation of col-
lusion remained solid and firm at the conclusion
of proceedings.
In a dramatic last-minute intervention, on 2
May 2012 PSNI Chief Inspector Roy McComb
attested the following to the Tribunal:
• The IRA had received information regarding
Breen and Buchanan from a detective Garda
officer who had not been publicly identified
to the Smithwick Tribunal and that this indi-
vidual had been paid a considerable amount
of money for this information.
•
Intelligence indicated that this officer also
provided information about Tom Oliver and
continued to provide information to the IRA
for a number of years.
This extraordinary information was under-
pinned by the then Assistant Chief Constable,
now Deputy Head of the PSNI, Drew Harris, an
officer significantly senior to McComb, who gave
further evidence to the Tribunal, in October 2012.
Harris stated:
“I would make the point that the inquiry was
provided with all the information which related
to the murders of Breen and Buchanan. What
has happened now is that more information has
become available to the Police Service and, as
I have said, that is live information and of the
moment. The initial provision of information
was both by ourselves and the Security Ser
-
vices, and... was a full disclosure of the
information that we felt able to give”. Smithwick
was being assailed by last-minute, game-
changing new evidence.
Harris was cross-examined by Owen Corri-
gan’s Senior Council, Jim O'Callaghan SC:
Q “Were you aware, Mr Harris, when you read
these five pieces of intelligence…that they
were beneficial to my client, Mr Corrigan,
who has been the focus of this Tribunal
inquiry for a number of years”.
A “Yes”.
Q “Did you see any unfairness in the fact that
the PSNI hadn't released this information
earlier?”.
A “This material, no, because this material
was released as quickly as we could manage
to release, given our other
responsibilities”.
But who is the Fourth Man about whom the two
pieces of intelligence relate who was just
revealed in 2012?”.
Counsel for the Tribunal Mary Laverty SC and
Drew Harris had the following exchange (led by
Laverty):
Q. "Do you believe Mr Harris that there is any
information that you could obtain for the Tri-
bunal in the near future" ?
A. "Well contact with an individual, and hope-
fully other individuals is ongoing and
hopefully within a few days to a week I will
know whether I have further information
which will be of assistance".
The cross-examination of Corrigan was over-
shadowed by the new information. When Roy
McComb arrived with new intelligence, Owen
Corrigan had been in the witness box for just
one day; the cross- examination by the Tribunal
hadn't begun.
But while McComb and later Harris provided
succour to the three gardaí who had been the
relentless focus of the Tribunal, Senior Garda
and their lawyers went on the offensive against
the quality of this new intelligence. Diarmaid
McGuinness SC fumed that he regarded the
information as
“nonsense on stilts”.
As it was impossible to “get behind” the
intelligence, it was impossible to assess it. The
concentration on methodology therefore dis-
tracted from the extraordinary content and the
possibility it posed of identifying the 'Fourth
Man'.
In February 2013, counsel for the Tribunal
Mary Laverty SC announced that the Tribunal
had gone on to check out the new information
with some PSNI and Garda Síochána members,
but the inquiries had run into the ground.
The Tribunal unsurprisingly declared that the
murder of Tom Oliver was not part of its remit,
but then accepted evidence that Corrigan had
given information that set him up for murder.
This was an unusual approach and of course
Corrigan took legal action by way of Judicial
Review. Following discussions between the
parties, on 25 May 2016, the Tribunal con
-
firmed, in a statement read to the High Court,
that, whatever evidence it had heard, its final
report had made no finding that the killing of
Oliver was as a result of information the ex-
garda provided to the Provisional IRA.
The action was then struck out by the High
Court on the following terms:
“While the Tribunal accepted the evidence of
Kevin Fulton there was no finding in the Tribu-
nal’s report that the killing of Mr Oliver was as
a result of the information provided by Mr Cor-
rigan to the IRA”.
The Smithwick Inquiry ended with an enig-
matic conclusion: a collusion - which this article
has shown was not satisfactorily proven, with
no named colluder.
NEWS
Counsel for the Tribunal Mary Laverty SC
announced that the Tribunal had gone on to
check out the 'Fourth Man' colluder, but the
inquiries had run into the ground
Patrick
‘Mooch’ Blair
Smithwick massively
downplayed Fulton’s
evidence in his report... and
ended with an enigmatic
conclusion - a collusion,
with no colluder