
November/December 9
leaders. Leo Varadkar, as Taoiseach, supported
it. His Private Secretary wrote to Bowes in July
2018 stating: “Your proposal aligns with the Gov-
ernment’s intention”.
Bowes was looking for partners, especially in
the GP sector. So he strategically approached
Maitiú (Matt) Ó’Tuathail who was then the
29-year-old president of the National Associa-
tion of General Practitioners (NAGP) allegedly
representing 2000 GPs, in competition with the
larger, famously well-funded and more general-
ist Irish Medical Organisation [IMO].
There was bad blood. The NAGP was radical,
dynamic, younger. According to a recent article
in Medical Independent. “The NAGP quickly es-
tablished itself as very media-friendly, with regu-
lar press releases, strong spokespeople, and a
number of high-profi le campaigns”.
It was challenging for the IMO. The NAGP
needed to poach members from its rival. To do
this required it to call the IMO to account for ne-
glecting to represent General Practice.
The di erent agendas of the competing rep-
resentative bodies came to a fl ashpoint when
Varadkar’s government excluded the insurgent
NAGP from the most crucial discussions a ect-
ing GPs in a generation. The IMO declined to of-
fer Village a view on the relationship at the time.
These were over the agreement on GP Con-
tractual Reform and Service Development and
the IMO claimed rights as the long-established
senior body to the role of sole negotiator - to
the dismay of the NAGP whose members’ liveli-
hoods too depended on the outcome.
On March 2 2015 the Irish Times ran a story
headlined ‘Doctors’ union says exclusion from
GP contract talks is “Stalinist”’. The NAGP was
spitting mad:
“The NAGP has urged its members not to
sign up to any proposals for the provision of
free care to under-sixes and described it as
‘misguided, inequitable and unworkable’.
Minister for Health Leo Varadkar told the
Sunday Business Post: ‘The Department
remains willing to engage with the NAGP
but given (the NAGP’s) stated position that
government’s policy on extending GP care
without fees is immoral, and their call for a
boycott. It is hard to see any real basis for
Leo Varadkar, his partner Matt Barrett, his friend Matt Ó’Tuathail and
others take time out in photographs forwarded by Ó’Tuathail to Bowes
Matt Ó’Tuathail is a well-meaning, progressive
and talented individual who has been doing
his best for the health system and particularly
highlighting the demise of general practice. He
is also now developing a high public profi le as a
trusted opinion-former, including on Covid.
“engaged for a number of days each week for
the past three months with the Department and
the HSE”, the insurgent NAGP organised a press
conference and a protest, subverting the nego-
tiations.
Dr Andy Jordan, NAGP chairperson, was un-
dermining the IMO insisting not just that the cuts
needed to be fully reversed but that there was
a need for increased funding of €400 million to
€500 million in order to make general practice
sustainable.
All in all, to Bowes, as of April 2019, Ó’Tuathail,
with all this savvy and passion, seemed like a
dynamic and open force in the health sector. In
the end it turned out he brought too much politi-
cal baggage.
Ó’Tuathail liked the idea of Community Hospi-
tal Ireland.
It was a noble idea and Ó’Tuathail felt he could
help push it to the government. “I can get this
in front of Leo and Simon”, he told Bowes. “He
showed me text messages from Leo Varadkar,
then Taoiseach.
Bowes says: “For some reason he sent me
photos [below] of Leo, Leo’s partner Matt Barrett
(who is a youthful cardiology consultant in Denis
O’Brien’s Beacon Hospital) and Ó’Tuathail social-
ising - sometimes knocking back pints - together.
This was a guy with connections”.
Bowes says that Connemara-born Matt
Ó’Tuathail is a well-meaning and talented in-
partnership at this time. For these reasons
a memorandum with the IMO has been
signed’.
‘Obviously we no longer live in a demo-
cratic society. In the Stalinist-style state we
now live in, if you question Government pol-
icy, your views are silenced by any means
possible’, said the organisation’s chief ex-
ecutive Chris Goodey.
‘The Minister has come up with one sham
reason after another to justify this discrimi-
nation against our members. He has fi nally
admitted that the real reason we are being
excluded is that we have refused to be bul-
lied into accepting a policy that is driven
by political need rather than the common
good’”.
The IMO and NAGP were enaed in an
institutional knife fi ht.
By 2018-19 it was being reported that the draft
negotiated by the IMO was addressing the cen-
tral issues for GPs of reversal of the €210 million
in long-standing ‘FEMPI’ cuts and preparation
for the overarching new health strategy, Sláin-
tecare.
The NAGP needed to steal some of the IMO’s
thunder, disrupt its self-gratulatory smugness.
Against this background on 6 February 2019,
just as the IMO was saying its talks with govern-
ment were getting “intensive” and the Medical
Independent reported that the IMO had been