
July-August 2024 77
Triple Lock: What is it and why we should keep it
Undermining the Triple Lock
Efforts to undermine those solemn
declarations, most notably led by Fine Gael
(also supported by Fianna Fáil) have been
roundly rejected in opinion poll after opinion
poll and by many other political parties. In
this respect, a 2022 decision at Fine Gael’s
Ard Fheis that voted in favour of a motion
that calls on the Government to remove the
Triple Lock is an indication of how out-of-
step that party is with the mood and
expressed views of the Irish people.
The Consultative Forum on Interna-
tional Security Policy
In the Spring of 2023. the government
established a Consultative Forum on
International Security Policy chaired by
Louise Richardson DBE (Dame Commander
of the Order of the British Empire).
The Forum was invited to consider
Ireland’s multilateral engagement on
security and defence issues, including
through our partnerships with the European
Union (EU), the United Nations (UN), and the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
It looked at:
•
• Ireland’s role in protecting the rules-
based international order; including its
experience in peacekeeping,
•
• Ireland’s approach to the European
Union’s Common Security and Defence
Policy (EU CSDP), and its engagement on
international law and accountability; and
•
• Ireland’s policy position of military
neutrality and an the definitions, options,
and implications of the policy of neutrality.
Richardson’s report was published on 10
October 2023. While it is beyond the scope
of this article to critique in detail the
conclusions of her report, one example
highlights the ambiguities within the report.
In her conclusions Richardson writes:
“Maintaining a policy of military
nonalignment along with active political
The Triple Lock
The Triple Lock requires that in general the
deployment of Irish Defence Forces troops
abroad be approved by the Dáil, the
government, and the UN Security Council or
General Assembly.
Irish People’s Commitment to Irish
Neutrality
An IPSOS/MRBI poll of 15th April, 2022,
showed two-thirds (66%) of voters did not
want to see any change in neutrality
“generally understood as…[requiring] a
United Nations Security Council (UNSC)
resolution for Irish troops to be committed
abroad”.
The Nice Treaty
On 12 June 2001, by a margin of 53.87% to
46.13%, the Irish electorate rejected the
Nice Treaty referendum (among its
provisions was the implementation of a
common foreign and security policy
including the progressive framing of a
common defence policy, which might lead to
a common defence) sending shock waves
not just through the Irish political system
but the European one too.
Panic-stricken, the Irish government
clutched onto any strategy they thought
would influence the Irish electorate to
change its mind. Central to that strategy was
the Triple Lock.
The Seville Declaration
That strategy was outlined in the Irish
‘Seville Declaration on the Treaty of Nice’,
wherein the Government made “a firm
commitment to the people of Ireland,
solemnised in this Declaration, that a
referendum will be held in Ireland on the
adoption of any such decision and on any
future Treaty which would involve Ireland
departing from its traditional policy of
military neutrality”.
The Seville Declaration further reiterated
“that the participation of contingents of the
Irish Defence Forces in overseas operations,
including those carried out under the
European security and defence policy”,
requires the Triple Lock as described above.
This was a solemn declaration.
Recognising the deeply felt concerns of the
Irish electorate and its much cherished
attachment to Irish neutrality, the then
government which included current
Tánaiste, Micheál Martin, entered into this
binding contract with the Irish people.
The Referendum Commissions and
the Triple Lock
In the lead-in to this referendum The
In the second Lisbon vote
a majority (67.1%) of the
Irish people were swayed
by the commitment to the
Triple Lock
Referendum Commission under the
chairmanship of Judge Frank Clarke, who
later became Chief Justice, outlined the
basic facts (p19) of the referendum including
the following:
“At the meeting of the European
Council at which this decision was
made, Ireland made a declaration in
relation to military neutrality. This sets
out Ireland’s policies and practices. It
reiterates [the Triple Lock as outlined
above].
This declaration will be associated
with the instrument of ratification if
Ireland does ratify the Lisbon Treaty”.
So the status of the Triple Lock was clear.
A majority of the Irish people were swayed
by these assurances. In a revision of the first
referendum, on 7 November 2002 a
significant majority (62.89%) approved the
Nice Treaty.
The Lisbon Treaty and the Triple
Lock
Further alarm ensued in June 2008 when
the Irish electorate rejected (53.4% to
46.6%) the Lisbon Treaty among the
provisions of which was the establishment
of a European Defence Agency to strengthen
the industrial and technological base of the
defence sector.
The response of the Irish Government to
these concerns in advance of the subsequent
Lisbon II referendum was outlined through
the Irish Guarantee on the Lisbon Treaty,
wherein through national declaration,
Ireland reiterated “that the participation of
contingents of the Irish Defence Forces in
overseas operations, including those
carried out under the European Common
Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) requires
(a) the authorisation of the operation by
the Security Council or the General Assembly
of the United Nations
(b) the agreement of the Irish Government
(c) the approval of Dáil Éireann, in
accordance with Irish law”.
The national declaration contained within
the Irish Guarantee on the Lisbon Treaty
further declared that Ireland would
participate only in European Defence Agency
projects or programmes “that contribute to
enhancing the capabilities required for
participation in UN-mandated missions for
peace-keeping, conflict prevention and
strengthening international security, in
accordance with the principles of the United
Nations Charter”.
A majority (67.1%) of the Irish people weas
swayed by the commitment to the Triple
Lock.