
48 February 2016
Stuff of the future
All of this means three things from the fiscal
policy perspective.
1
In the short run, things appear to be sustain-
able and there is some room for cutting
income taxes. The key risks to this consid-
eration are:
On the downside: corporation tax and the
cost of funding Government debt; and
On the upside: VAT and Income Tax receipts
and one-off capital receipts that can benefit
from more domestic growth
2
Also in the short run, there is no room for
accelerating increases in expenditure, as all
the improvements in our fiscal performance
in 2015 can be attributed solely to one-off
revenue gains and increases in tax receipts.
A large share of the latter, relating to corpo-
ration tax receipts, is questionable from the
sustainability point of view.
3
In the long run, Ireland still needs significant
reforms of taxation, and of public manage-
ment and governance.
We do not have, yet, a full break down of 2015
expenditures under ESA2010 (the EU account-
ing framework) guidelines, but latest data show
that for the period of the first nine months of
each year, taxes and social contributions are
now up €8.22bn, while Government expenses
are down €6.89bn on the same period of 2011.
This is not a picture consistent with reforms-
driven rebalancing of fiscal management.
Compensation of Government employees is
down only €25m on 2011 levels, while the use
of goods and services and taxes payable on
these is up €28m and subsidies are up €167m.
The real problem lies not in the structure of
social welfare or health benefits, but in man-
agement of the public workforce and
expenditures. And that problem is rapidly
becoming obscured under cover of booming tax
extraction from the economy.
Three Point Plan
Some of these points are in Mr Kenny’s ‘Three
Point Plan’ from Davos, but there are few details
to go by in actually assessing their expected
impact. Instead of providing costed and inde-
pendently verified numbers, the Taoiseach is,
for now, happy throwing around lofty
aspirations.
In the first part of his ‘Davos Plan’, he asserts
that the Government will “continue to create
even more job opportunities… to add an addi-
tional 200,000 jobs by 2020” at which point
“everybody who wants a job will be able to get
one”. Now, according to the latest CSO projec-
tions, the Irish labour force in 2021 is expected
to be 2,313,500 or 127,500 more than in 3Q
2015. At the same time, there were roughly
75,000 people on State Activation Programmes,
such as Job Bridge, on average, at the end of
2015. The Government is also aiming to bring
back some 70,000 of Irish emigrants. Taking
the above numbers together, the Taoiseach is
promising to create 200,000 jobs for about
275,000 potential candidates, and still create
‘full employment’. You’d need the mathematics
of quantum physics to make these numbers
work.
Beyond this, Enda Kenny claims that to
achieve his job-creation targets, the Govern
-
ment “will… invest more in skills and
infrastructure and cut taxes on smaller, Irish-
owned businesses”. Which is fine in theory, but
tough to swallow in practice. First, as Budget
2016 showed, the Government is hell-bent on
creating more and bigger loopholes for tax opti-
misation by MNCs. Second, investing in skills
and infrastructure requires money; as does cut-
ting taxes on Irish-owned businesses. The
Government also promises “to continue cutting
personal income tax rates, reforming our wel-
fare system and improving affordable access to
childcare and medical care for working parents
in order to “make work pay”.
All of these objectives, save reforming Social
Welfare, will have to carry a net cost to the
Exchequer in either revenues foregone or
increased expenditure. Even if the Government
replicates its claimed successes to-date in
‘reforming’ Social Welfare, the savings achieved
will be at the most about €600m per annum.
Based on the average revenue uplift over the
last 3 years, the Exchequer can count on addi-
tional €3bn in annual revenue increases, in the
absence of any changes to the tax regime.
Can roughly €3.6bn in additional fiscal
cushioning cover all of the above spending
objectives? I have my doubts. And so do the
IMF and the EU.
But Enda Kenny is not finished, yet, with
spending money he doesn’t quite have. “…The
third step in the plan is to continue to fund sen-
sible improvements in key public services and
housing...”. In other words, more promises of
increased public spending on everything – from
social housing to support ‘packages’ for fami-
lies and the elderly, to increased levels of
employment and pay in the public sector.
The good news is: according to the Govern-
ment, the fiscal rules “will cap the growth of
government spending below the underlying
growth capacity of the economy”. The bad news
is: according to the hard fiscal balance numbers
to-date, the rule simply does not appear to
hold, while in terms of forward assessment, the
idea of quantifying the “underlying growth
capacity of the economy” is simply a pipe
dream.
In summary: the Taoiseach’s latest ‘Three
Point Plan’ is based on soft numbers and hard
promises – something that is reminiscent of his
predecessors’ approach to policy formation in
government and indeed in opposition.
Ireland has the largest
gap between claimed
competitiveness gains
and productivity –
explained by devaluation
of the euro
Irish Government Performance
Cumulative 1Q-3Q figures
Euro millions
Irish Government Performance
Cumulative 1Q-3Q figures
Euro
millions
GENERAL DELIVERY