July 2022 77
S
INCE FEBRUARY 2022, the Ukrainian
crisis has obviously become the most
important topic of conversation and
debate in Russian society.
Unfortunately, there have not been
enough reliable research papers collecting
information on how Russians perceive the crisis.
Nevertheless, it is possible to briefly identify
three main categories: opponents, supporters,
and those who seek just to get on with their lives.
Let us examine each group in a little more detail.
Some opponents are members of the
opposition, and protest specifically against the
actions of the government. They emphasise that
the growing conflict between Russia and the
West’ does not lead to any advantages, but
rather is poisonous to Russia’s national interests.
Political isolation, economic decline due to the
withdrawal of several companies from the
Russian market, and the severance of social and
cultural ties are cited as the main downsides.
Many claim that Russia has now lost about ten
years of technological development due to the
escalation of the conflict.
Some opposition is moral — people who do not
accept military action leading to human suering
and dying as a way to solve any problem.
Opponents of military action have no problem
expressing their position privately or online.
But at opposition rallies many people are
detained, and one can also face consequences
for speaking out in public.
It is worth pointing out that in the Russian
media it is rather dicult to criticise a special
military operation. For example, there is a law on
fake news about the Russian army, which strictly
controls any information submitted by the media
considering the current events.
And we should also not forget that it is better
to call a special military operation by that name
only, as a dierent designation may lead to
negative consequences.
By Artemy Dzhafarovis
A student in Moscow reveals untold attitudes to
the special military operation among Russians
The supporters of a military
operation are very likely to
outnumber its opponents
Wr/specil-opertion protesters in St Petersburg in Februry
The supporters of a military operation are very
likely to outnumber its opponents.
Looking at the situation with an open mind:
first, the special military operation is heavily
supported by the state-controlled media, which
dominates.
Given that many people rely on TV, they
somehow find themselves exposed to the ocial
point of view with relatively few sources of
alternative positions.
Second, the special military operation is
conducted under the auspices of the fight against
Nazism and Fascism.
Given the historical trauma received by the
Russian people after World War II, all citizens of
the state sincerely despise Fascism as it was in
Germany in the middle of the twentieth century.
Fighting fascism is a legitimate justification for
the use of military force for many.
Third, it is worth pointing out that there is a
stratum of people who support a special military
operation from a purely rational point of view.
There is the idea that Russia is currently fighting
for its sovereignty. According to supporters of the
special military operation, at the moment only
countries such as the United States, China,
France and some others have sovereignty.
In other words, very few countries are truly
independent. This is due to the tight attachment
to the dollar, as well as the integration of many
countries into the world economy as virtual
colonies, from which resources are siphoned o.
The truly independent countries are a small
circle that earned it ‘by right of force’, that is, by
“Opponents, supporters, and those
who seek just to get on with their lives
winning first the Second World War and then the
Cold War.
Russia, as the successor of the USSR, was the
loser in the Cold War. And now, from the point of
view of some supporters of a special military
operation, Russia is using the right of the
strongest to regain its sovereignty, and is doing
so successfully. As with the opponents of the
special military operation, the number of
supporters is not certain. However, it is certainly
huge.
The largest percentage of the Russian
population, oddly enough, withdraw from the
events of the Ukrainian crisis. In the opinion of
many, everything in this conflict has become so
complicated that it is no longer possible to make
sense of it. The parties to the conflict present
various arguments and facts, but many of them
turn out to be false.
The problem is the growing negative attitude
towards ordinary Russians in the society of many
countries because it leads to misunderstanding
and reciprocal negativity on the part of the
Russians. The so-called “Russophobia” does no
good, raising anger only. Many ordinary citizens
of Russia admit that they cannot influence the
situation in any way, and do not understand why
they are required to take responsibility for the
actions of those whose decisions people have no
direct control over.
Thus, an overload of contradictory facts and
ideas, as well as an awareness of their own low
importance in decision-making chains, leads
people to abstract away from the events of the
Ukrainian crisis. And such people are in the
majority.
To conclude, there is a need for more research.
But it is clear that there are a lot of people who
oppose the special military for various reasons.
Many more Russians support it, based on solid
arguments.
But the majority of people are simply tired of
the continuous bad news and just try to get on
with their lives.
Artemy Dzhafarovis is pursuing a master’s degree
in international relations at the Higher School of
Economics in Moscow specialising in Celtic
nationalism and the politics of the British Isles.
INTERNATIONAL

Loading

Back to Top