
September/October 2015 3
Online
www.villagemagazine.ie
@VillageMagIRE
Village Magazine promotes in its
columns the fair distribution of
resources, welfare, respect and
opportunity by the analysis and
investigation of inequalities,
unsustainable development
and corruption, and the media’s
role in their perpetuation; and
by acute cultural analysis.
Editor
Michael Smith
editor@villagemagazine.ie
Advertising
sales@villagemagazine.ie
+353 1 873 5824
Production
Village Magazine
Editorial Board
Niall Crowley, Joan Fitzpatrick
Bride Rosney, Michael Smith
Contributing Editors
Niall Crowley, John Gormley
Printers
Boylans, Drogheda, Co Louth
Village is published by:
Ormond Quay Publishing
6 Ormond Quay Upper, Dublin 7
Copyright Inquiries
sales@villagemagazine.ie
Issue 40
September/October
2015
EDITORIAL
Perspective
Focus anger and energy to promote equality and sustainability
E
NDA Kenny was not in fact damned by the Fennelly
report. It found he did not sack or seek to sack hap-
less Garda commissioner Martin Callinan.
Admittedly there are caveats and a “however”, but from
the fury of commentators and opposition politicians
you would think Kenny was Bertie Ahern. When people
need to be fired, and no-one could vouch confidence in
the commissioner, it’s impossible for the axe-wielder to
look good. The most important thing was to remove the
commissioner, in a society where too often incompe-
tents are left in place.
Village is not particularly well disposed to Enda
Kenny as a force in politics but that is because of his
antipathy to equality and sustainability (and all that
winking). Not how he fires people, though clearly he
can learn lessons in transparency, and minute-taking.
Certainly there are questions for the Attorney Gen-
eral and the Garda Commissioner (and indeed his
successor) and the report published is only a compo-
nent of an ongoing investigation of Garda station
recordings but a sense of proportion is required and
anger should be dispensed effectively.
For example, for Village other issues of propriety
have more legs. The recommendations of the Moriarty
and Mahon Tribunals languish. What happened to the
team of officers from CAB who were looking at the
£, channelled to Lowry by Denis O’ Brien after
Lowry had granted the second mobile-phone licence to
O’Brien’s Esat in ? What is happening to Ben
Dunne who received benefits from Lowry that were
“profoundly corrupt to a degree that was nothing short
of breathtaking”? Is Bertie Ahern to be prosecuted for
his perjury and conspiring to mislead the Mahon
tribunal?
The authorised officer’s dossier on Ansbacher pur-
ports to establish a wide-ranging establishment
conspiracy to ensure well-known holders of illegal
bank accounts were never exposed. Why has this never
been investigated and why will the media not even
report it?
If propriety is the issue, Kenny is not the outstanding
problem.
But it is not the principal problem. There are epochal
emergencies such as the rise of Isis, failed nations,
colossal migration and climate change. Kenny, no
visionary, makes little difference to these issues.
Meanwhile, basic iniquities seldom make the news.
Poverty, Travellers’ rights, Direct Provision and refu-
gees (until there’s a photogenic death), homelessness,
the iniquities of the bank guarantee and Nama, species
loss.
For Village the overarching issue is equality. Village
believes equality of outcome is an ethical imperative.
We are all equal from birth and ethically. Society’s goal
is to recognise that by distributing resources to rein-
force that equality.
Only equality gives the perspective necessary to deal
pre-emptively with each of the problems above, without
the need for a crisis, a death or a photo-op.
The debate about equality is very crude, partly
because those who benefit from inequality want to keep
it that way.
For example, inconveniently, during the Great Reces-
sion in Ireland the two income groups worst affected
were the very highest earners whose income fell by over
% and the very lowest earners whose incomes fell by
%. It is important nevertheless to keep a focus on
the fact that absolute poverty and deprivation levels
- among those very lowest earners – have been rising
consistently since . The level of deprivation has
almost doubled since . As Mike Allen notes, for
example, in this edition of Village: in July this year,
families became homeless, of them for the first time.
Anybody seeking to address the big ethical issue of
equality would have only to undertake to reduce abso-
lute poverty and increase equality, measured by the
Gini coefficient, across the range of income levels, and
to leave office if they did not make progress. That politi-
cians are insincere is evident from their unwillingess to
establish simple indicators to gauge their impact on
fairness.
And sustainability is a subsidiary of equality for it is
transcendently unequal to transmit fewer of the earth’s
resources and joys to the next generation than the
legacy left to this generation.
In , and years they will not remember Sep-
tember for the Fennelly Report (or for water
charges or property taxes). They will note that we
allowed inequality to pervade, that we were squander-
ing the earth’s resources and that we failed to avail of
the opportunity to tame climate change.
And they may note that the desperate quest for
asylum, and its principal driver, an anarchic civilisa-
tion-subverting industrial-scale terrorism of daunting
ambition, both first became manifest on a vast scale in
.
If we think migration on the scales we’ve reluctantly
been debating over the last few weeks is dramatic, wait
until climate change drives millions from drought,
desertification and sea-level rises.
If we want to deal with the problems of our era and
for future generations to pay us any respect we must
ensure all policy pushes for equality and sustainability.
And direct our ire at those who stand in its way. Not get
waylaid by an incompetent firing of an inept Garda
Commissioner. •