1 6 March 2016
POLITICS
Protect!
A progressive agenda for the new
social protection minister
by Mary Murphy
T
henewMinisterforSocialProtection
willfaceanumberofsignicantchal-
lenges. S/he has to deal
comprehensivelywiththedamageof
theimmediatepast,whileexpediting
longoverduereforms,andatthesametimestay
ontopofnewwelfarechallengesassociated
withchangingformsoffamily,employmentpat-
terns, demographic trends: all betrayed by
pervasiveinequalities.
TheUNhasprovidedsomevaluableguidance
forthenewMinister-intheConcludingObser-
vationsoftheUnitedNations Committeeon
Economic,Social andCulturalRightson the
thirdperiodicreportofIrelandaboutimplemen-
tation of the International Covenant on
Economic,SocialandCulturalRightsofJune
2015.TheCommitteestronglyadvisedthataus-
teritypoliciesshouldonlybetemporaryand
onlycovertheperiodofthecrisis.Theyrecom-
mendedthatIrelandrestorepre-crisislevelsof
socialprotection.TheystatedthatIrelandmust
strengthen policy capacity with a disaggre-
gateddatastrategyandadequaterightsand
equality-proongmechanisms.
FivekeyprioritiesforthenewMinisterfor
SocialProtectionaresuggested:
1 Redressingtheimpactofausteritycutson
childrenatriskofpoverty,youngpeople
under26,andloneparents.Thesegroups
sufferedseriouscollateraldamagefromaus-
terity budgets that failed to protect the
vulnerable;
2
Reversingreductionsinwelfarepayments
thatleftrecipientsbelowthepovertyline;
3
Tacklinglong-termunemploymentina
mannerthatpromotesinclusioninthelabour
marketforallthosewhowantemployment,
includingpeoplewithdisabilities,andall
women;
4 Ensuringthecontributionofsocialwelfare
payments to the growing crisisin family
homelessness.
5 Changingthemalebreadwinnermodeland
responding to new forms of family
diversity.
TheuniversalChildBenetwasreducedover
anumberofausteritybudgetsfrom€166per
monthin2010to€130pmin2013,withaddi-
tionalcutstothehigherpaymentsforthe3rd+
child.Thispaymentwasincreasedby€5over
budgets2015and2016andisnow€140.The
combinedimpactofthesecutsandparental
unemploymentmeanschildpovertydoubled
overthecrisisperiod.Social-welfare-depend-
ent single families with children suffered
cumulativecutsoverthecrisis.Thenumberof
jobless households with children also bur-
geoned. Tackling child poverty is far more
complexthansimplyrestoringchildbenetto
itspre-crisislevel.ThenewMinistermusttake
seriouslytheadviceofferedbytheNational
EconomicandSocialCouncil(NESC0andby
various commissions and expert groups. A
tieredandbettertargetedchild-income-sup
-
port system is a prerequisite for efciently
tacklingchildpovertybutavoidingunneces
-
saryunemploymentandpovertytraps.
Austeritydisproportionatelydamaged the
young.Itsmechanismsincludedemigration,
deteriorationinthequalityofemploymentand
severesocialwelfarecuts-withjob-seekers’
allowancereducedbymorethanhalfforthose
under 25 (from €204 to €100). Many young
peoplehaveemigratedtoavoidnotonlypov-
ertyandunemploymentbutalsolow-quality
employmentandunder-employment;others
remaintrappedintheparentalhomeunableto
affordthetransitiontoindependentadultlife
or to move to larger urban centres to seek
employment. An immediate priority is
resolvingthesituationofthe600youngpeople
who,unabletosustainresidentialtenancieson
suchaninadequateincome,areleftdependant
onemergencyhomelessservices.
ThenewMinistershouldrevisittheprevious
Minister’soverzealouscutstoloneparents’
incomedisregards,andthedecisiontocompel
loneparents,oncetheiryoungestchildis14
yearsold,toworkfull-time.Itisclearthatthis
policyisnotconducivetothewellbeingofpar-
entsorchildren.Variouscreativealternative
reformproposalshavebeenofferedtopromote
a more positive reform agenda capable of
addressingpoverty and respecting parents’
choices for reconciling care work and paid
employment.
WhiletheEUSurveyofIncomeandLiving
Conditions(SILC)showspoverty,deprivation,
consistentpovertyandinequalityroseoverthe
crisis(Table1),WatsonandMaitre(2013)still
ndhighlevelsofefcacyinIrishsocialtrans-
fers.Despitesocialwelfarecuts,Irishwelfare
paymentswererelativelyeffectiveincushion-
ing people from the worst effects of rising
unemployment and falling incomes. Social
GENERAL NATIONAL
DEPRIVATION RATES
National Deprivation
Rates for lone parents
13.7%
24.5%
30.5%
63%
Social transfers reduced
the post-transfer poverty
rate by 53% in 2004, but
this rose to 71% by 2013.
Deprivation rose from
13.7% 30.5% between
2008 and 2013