July 2021 37
1. Taoiseach Jack Lynch and
British Ambassador John
Peck alarmed at prospect of
Captain Kelly’s book
After Captain James Kelly was acquitted by the jury
at the infamous Arms Trial in October 1970, he began
to write a book about what had happened to him. His
efforts were closely monitored by the British
Embassy. The embassy was led by John Peck, a dirty-
tricks expert who had earlier commanded the
notorious Information Research Department (IRD).
The IRD was complicit
in the massacre of hun-
dreds of thousands of
people due to the black
propaganda it pumped
out. Peck was involved
in the coup against the
democratically elected
and secular – and pop-
ular – leader of Iran in
the late 1940s, the
event that precipitated
so much turmoil in the
Middle East. The IRD’s
most reprehensible
crime was the malign
encouragement it gave
to the anti-communist
By David Burke
POLITICS
Garda Richrd Fllon
Ambassador John Peck,
dirty-tricks expert.
Captain James Kelly; a copy
of his book was stolen by the
British Foreign Office.
The British Spy,
Saor Éire and
The Murder Of
Garda Richard Fallon
forces in Indonesia who slaughtered hundreds of
thousands of people as a result.
In January 1971, Peck alerted Kelvin White, a
senior diplomat at the West European Department of
the Foreign and Commonwealth Oce (FCO), about
Captain Kellys book: “When I saw the Taoiseach
[Jack Lynch] just before Christmas [1970] he men-
tioned casually that Captain James Kelly was trying
to produce in double quick time a book about the
arms trial which, he claimed, was going to be full of
damaging material about the involvement of the
whole Irish government. Why Lynch passed-on this
information is a mystery.
2. Dirty Tricks to halt the
Publication of Captain Kellys
Book
Captain Kelly managed to secure a contract with the
British publisher Collins who described his book as
the “most explosive book for some time”, in the
London media. The title of the forthcoming book was
‘Orders for The Captain’.
Peck was determined to halt the book. He provided
the FCO with some thoughts about how London
might exert pressure on Collins to drop it, such as
that it might be libellous. The FCO was soon advising
Peck they had a contact in Collins. AC Thorpe of the
FCO met a disloyal employee who undertook to steal
a proof of the book. When the FCO read the stolen
38 July 2021
manuscript, they found something in it that
confirmed their worst fears: something so
alarming they intervened and successfully
persuaded Collins to abandon the publica
-
tion. Thorpe was well pleased with the result
and commented that the author’s search for a
publisher would now “have to start again from
scratch”.
Michael Gill, managing director of Gill and
Macmillan, stepped into the breach with an
oer to publish it. Plates were made up and
sent to a firm called Cahills for printing. On
this occasion, George Colley, a minister in
Lynch’s cabinet, swooped. As Captain Kelly
put it, Cahills had some “valuable govern-
ment printing contracts and this was the soft
underbelly that gave the Irish government its
chance, with word coming down from George
Colleys Ministry of Finance to halt printing or
else! As far as both governments were con-
cerned, ‘Orders for The Captain’ was not going
to see the light of day and they nearly
succeeded.
Undaunted, Captain Kelly decided to self-
publish the book and approached a number
of printers but, “the word had got out” and
they were “not prepared to print in the face of
ocial opprobrium”.
Help materialised out of the shadows: the
Captain next received a phone call from a man
who refused to identify himself but “requested
that I meet him in an oce in Jervis Street in
Dublin’s city centre. He indicated that he
might be in a position to help solve my print-
ing problem. In Jervis Street, I climbed one or
two flights of stairs in the designated building
and found myself in a dark, dingy oce. An
apparently sturdy figure of average height sat
hunched behind a small bare desk. He ges-
tured towards the chair. Reiterating that he
did not want to be identified, he requested
that I should forget the meeting once it was
over. To this day, I have not met the man again
nor do I know who he was, but somehow or
other I got the impression that he was a
lawyer.
The mysterious figure told him that there
was a “small printing machine,
operating on the phonographic
system around the corner in
Abbey Street, which I could
rent. We discussed the ‘ins and
outs’ of the matter and it was
agreed that I should print
2,000 copies of the book ini-
tially, sell them and then pay
the rent of the machine and
the wages of the operator;
and carry on from there. We
shook hands on the deal and
I went straight to the printing
shop, where I introduced myself to the
young machine operator and explained
what I intended doing. Obviously, he had
been briefed to expect me and I arranged to
bring in the plates the following week. With-
out hesitation or payment, Michael Gill
instructed Cahills to release the plates to me,
while the printing firm, despite the ocial
diktat not to print, agreed to collate and bind
the book. On the due date, I arrived in Abbey
Street; the machine was set up, and we were
ready to go”.
The rst 2,000 prints sold out in days, but
Captain Kelly found himself short of copies
when the “clamour for them was at its high-
est”. Nevertheless, he spent a year producing
and distributing the book, “considerably
relieving the impecunious position I and my
family found ourselves in after the trauma of
the trials”.
3. What was in the book
that so alarmed the
British?
One of the more unpleasant myths to emerge
from the vines of dishonesty which have
wrapped themselves around the Arms Crisis
was a tendril which tried to manufacture a link
between Captain Kelly and Saor Éire, the para-
military group which murdered Garda Richard
Fallon on the Quays in Dublin in April 1970.
Captain Kelly was arrested in May 1970 by the
Head of Garda Special Branch, John Fleming,
and an Inspector Doocey. The pair interviewed
Captain Kelly at the Bridewell. As the Captain
recounted in ‘Orders for the Captain’, the first
question put to him by Doocey was: “What do
you know about the Garda Fallon murder?”.
When Captain Kelly responded with purple-
veined outrage, the question was
withdrawn.
The reason for the question was a false and
malicious rumour that the Captain and his
associates had helped Saor Éire to procure
the gun used to shoot Garda Fallon. While
there was no evidence for
this, the allegation clearly
poisoned the attitude of
the Garda against Captain
Kelly and his associates.
Neil Blaney, one of the
Cabinet ministers dis
-
missed by Taoiseach Jack
Lynch during the Arms
Crisis, was so incensed
about rumours linking him
to the group, he not only
denied them but referred to
the organisation in the Dáil
during the Arms Crisis
debate as “that lousy outt
Saor Éire.
4. Where did the murder
weapon come from?
So, where did the murder weapon come from?
According to Seán Boyne, author of the bril-
liant book, Gunrunners, Saor Éire had been
amassing weapons in the late 1960s. One of
its members revealed to him that they had
established a contact who worked at the Brit-
ish Small Arms factory in Birmingham. It
‘proved’ 9mm Star pistols for the Star muni-
tions factory in Spain. The contact was able to
set aside perfectly good pistols as ‘rejects’
and later smuggle them out of the factory.
They were then sent to Ireland, passing sur-
reptitiously through Dublin Airport.
Another source of guns for Saor Éire had
been a high-profile Dublin underworld figure.
Boyne discovered that the Gardaí had come
to believe that one of the Birmingham guns
had been used to murder Garda Fallon in
Dublin on 3 April 1970.
5. British Intelligence spies
on Saor Éire but lets
them smuggle guns to
Ireland
British Intelligence could have halted the
importation of the murder weapon but chose
not to. The British agent who knew all about
the Saor Éire gun-running eorts was the mys-
terious Captain Peter Markham Randall.
Captain Kelly had saved his life in Dublin in
November 1969 when he had tried to gain
access to what he believed were IRA gun-train-
ing camps by oering arms to Northern
Nationalists including John Kelly, a later co-
defendant at the Arms Trials.
Captain Kelly described the British spy in
‘Orders for the Captain’ as a “small, dark-
haired, goatee-bearded man”. This description
bears a striking resemblance to the arms
dealer that Boyne described as having helped
What was in Kelly’s book that was
of such concern?
Sean Boyne
describes efforts
by a British agent
to infiltrate Saor
Éire. He was
undoubtedly the
same man who
featured in Kelly’s
book.
July 2021 39
Saor Éire. He was also a “small man with a goatee
beard” and was called ‘Randall. According to
Boyne’s source, Randall had made contact with a
person linked to Saor Éire in the UK in the late 1960s:
“‘arms dealer’ gave his name as Randall, although
other versions of the name were also reported. The
Saor Éire-linked individual in the UK, in good faith,
passed on this contact to his friends in the organisa-
tion back in Ireland, who were equally unsuspecting.
In retrospect, the possibility opens up that British
intelligence somehow detected Saor Éire activities
in the UK and decided to infiltrate the subversive
group by using an agent or a ‘front’ man, the myste-
rious Mr. Randall”.
Suce it to say, if British Intelligence had moved
to cut o the supply of weapons from Birmingham
instead of exploiting it to preserve Markham-Ran-
dall’s cover and develop other leads, it is possible
Garda Fallon might not have been killed, or at least
not by a weapon from Birmingham.
Bearing all the foregoing in mind, a passage in the
Captain’s book can only have alarmed Peck and his
masters in London to wit:
The quest for arms by Northern representatives
continued, and in November a suspected British
agent was lured to Dublin. After three or four days’
negotiation in the Gresham Hotel, the supposed
arms salesman oered a bribe to one of the North-
erners. Negotiations were immediately broken o
and an agent, who was using the name of Peter
Markham-Randall, presumably returned to England.
I reported the aair to Colonel Heeron and he initi-
ated enquiries with Garda Headquarters”.
6. Spying on Charlie Haugheys
Brother in Portugal
Another person the British went to considerable
lengths to monitor was Jock Haughey who knew
about Markham-Randall from his participation in the
attempt to purchase arms from him in November
1969. In October 1970 he went on a holiday to Por-
tugal with his wife Kitty. One leg of the journey took
the couple through Britain where they noticed they
had picked up a tail, a British gentleman who shad
-
owed their every move. In the mornings he would sit
at the table next to them while they ate breakfast and
then monitor them during the day. At night he would
sit next to them again. While the Haugheys had been
disturbed by him at the start of their holiday, they
soon found his pedantic and predictable behaviour
amusing, especially his habit of ordering lobster –
and no other meal on the menu - for his evening meal.
On at least one occasion they attempted to engage
him in conversation much to his embarrassment and
without success. On their return to Britain, he
skipped the passport control queue and went
directly to talk to the ocials while the other pas-
sengers were queuing up.
The most plausible reason for trying to sabotage
‘Orders for the Captain’ and for the shadowing of Jock
Haughey across Europe was because they were
members of a tiny group of people who knew about
Markham-Randall and could provide clues linking
him to the murder weapon Saor Éire might have used
to kill Garda Fallon; further, that British Intelligence
had not shared the information Markham-Randall
had gathered about Saor Éire in the late 1960s to
help shut it down. Fallon was not murdered until April
of 1970. Had this volatile connection been made, the
incandescence among the rank-and-file gardaí, not
to mention at middle and senior level, had the poten-
tial to set garda relations with MI5 and MI6 at nought,
with little prospect of any reconciliation for years.
The roots of the British operation to suppress this
information undoubtedly reached far deeper than
anything described here. For a start, MI6 had clearly
learned of the Haugheys’ holiday plans in advance
and had been able to book an agent into the same
hotel they proposed to visit.
To achieve this, they must have had access to the
familys phone conversations. In 1970 phone tap-
ping was carried out by making a physical connection
to a phone line, something that could only be done
in the vicinity of a junction near the targets phone.
It is unlikely that MI6 deployed a tapping unit to
Dublin in 1970. Instead, the information was prob-
ably furnished to them by a senior figure with access
to the transcripts generated by Special Branch
tappers.
7. Smearing Jock Haughey
A retired Special Branch ocer familiar with Saor Éire
and the two informers who were recruited by the
gardaí from inside it is adamant that Jock Haughey
had “nothing whatsoever – absolutely nothing – to
do with Saor Éire. Yet Jock Haughey spent the rest of
his life unfairly tarnished by questions about the
murder of Garda Fallon. Garret FitzGerald continued
to press the issue in the Dáil over the next decade.
The Garda did not forget their fallen colleague. In
2014 a fresh inquiry was conducted by a detective
superintendent attached to the Serious Crime
Review Team at the National Bureau of Criminal
Investigation. He and his team would have been well
advised to have made enquiries in London about the
spy who masqueraded as Captain Peter Markham-
Randall and the files MI5 and MI6 undoubtedly have
about him and the Saor Éire gun-smuggling network
he penetrated.
Captain Peter Markham-
Randall infiltrated the Saor Eire
gun-smuggling operation
Jock and Kitty Haughey

Loading

Back to Top