
June 3
EDITORIAL
Issue 56
June 2017
ONLINE
EDITOR
ADVERTISING
DESIGN PRODUCTION
INTERN
PRINTERS
VILLAGE IS PUBLISHED BY:
The nasty
party?
N
ORA OWEN whose appeal is otherwise limited
but who seems to know a lot about Fine Gael,
of which she was once deputy leader, includ-
ing perhaps what it represents, says Leo
Varadkar came to her constituency as a
17-year-old and that he was “he was appallingly right-
wing and very aggressive”. He was also overweight and
seems to have adopted the blazer look favoured by the
young fogie. It is easy to imagine him as the caricature
of a Tory. Lucinda Creighton has said she wasn’t exactly
enamoured of him when she first met him around that
time: “I felt he was a bit obnoxious”, she has said.
So what changed with Leo?
Nothing (except perhaps an inflated bonhomie).
Being ideological in Ireland is impossible for historical
and cultural reasons so the press can’t call a rightwinger
a rightwinger. But he is.
Here’s something he ventilated during his recent cam-
paign for the leadership of Fine Gael. “I’m not sure what
values Minister Coveney is putting across. The only value
seems to be that we should try to be kind to everyone.
And that’s not what I mean by political values. When I
talk about political values I mean the things that actually
are Fine Gael’s political values – like equality of oppor-
tunity, and like enterprise and reward. These aren’t
things I’ve invented, these are in our Constitution”. He
added other values but for him these were incontrovert
-
ible, prime and pre-eminent.
It is a recipe to make Fine Gael the nasty party, long
after Theresa May’s half-hearted analysis sent Britain’s
Tory party in search of a bit of nice. Its membership, a
majority of whose members favoured the Just Society
touting Simon Coveney, should brace themselves.
Imagine being a half-Indian gay 38-year-old in the
prime of your life and at the top of your career and decid-
ing what you want to do is target the most disadvantaged
in society, those most discriminated against in the most
tangible ways, economically and socially.
Imagine feeling that you want to spell out a message
that the most scandalous misappropriations are by the
welfare classes not the bankster classes. Imagine being
Minister for Social Protection, representing the classes
that have nothing to get up for in the morning and run
-
ning a campaign that promotes those who get up early
in the morning.
Varadkar appears to have been assimilated. The
doctor with the King’s Hospital education has no instinct
for the disadvantaged or the oppressed. There is
insufficient space here to outline what this appears to
mean for his views on social issues such as abortion,
mental health and racism. There is enough about his
views on economics and redistribution. David Langwall-
ner and Ben Harper make the case in this month’s Village
that his economics is that of the markets: Neoliberalism.
Certainly he is the apostle of equality of opportunity
rather than substantive equality – of outcome.
He has noted with the derisiveness of the College
debater, “We could have much more equality and be
poorer”.
Indeed he says: “My difficulty with the whole right-left
construct is that I don’t think it describes modern poli-
tics, or the modern choices that people face in the
world,” he says. “But I don’t want to be running away
from a label. If I was to describe myself in terms of a
political philosophy, I’d cast myself as a social and eco-
nomic liberal, which is typically what people describe as
being left-of-centre on social issues and right-of-centre
on economic issues. It’s not that I’m afraid to be tagged
with the label of right-wing, or even centre-right, I just
don’t believe it properly describes either the choice that
we face politically, or what I’m trying to say”.
But Varadkar is no Macron and there is no need for a
shift to the right here. Ireland has among the lowest tax
regimes in Europe, among the fastest growth rates,
among the poorest public services. France is the oppo-
site in every respect. Furthermore Ireland has taken a
paralysing dose of austerity over the last decade; France
eschewed it. When the circumstances are different we
must apply different measures.
Ireland has taken its turn to the right. It does not need
a Thatcher with a broad, cosmopolitan grin to take it fur-
ther still towards ‘economic freedom’.