īī ā īīīīīīī April ā May 2013
T
HE Millennium Development Goals
agreed by the United Nations in īīīī
come as close as you can get to moth-
erhood and apple pie in the global
development ļ¬eld. These eight goals are cred-
ited with reductions in extreme poverty and child
mortality, increased access to safe drinking water
and primary school enrolment, improved gender
equality and greater levels of overseas develop-
ment aid. What could be wrong with all that?
Well, the targets set, because they are
globalised, disguise uneven progress between dif-
ferent countries. Sub-Saharan Africa, for example,
has not done well. And the targets, because they
focus on extreme poverty, do not address dispari-
ties within countries. That would have required
the wealthier countries to look to their own per-
formance at home as well as abroad.
A focus on extreme poverty is important.
However, it does not necessarily lend itself to
development, as this requires a wider transfor-
mation of both the economy and society. The
Millennium Development Goals sit easily and,
ultimately conveniently, with the neo-liberal
economic project. The emphasis is on social
development and not economic development and
the focus is on extreme poverty and not on equal-
ity. This leaves the economy to market forces and
the private sector. It conļ¬nes the role of the state
and overseas donors to building so-called human
capital.
In this way the Millennium Development
Goals end up enabling a development model
based on a small state role, foreign direct invest-
ment, and largely unfettered market forces. This
is a model that runs counter to the values that
these goals aspire to.
The Irish Government has an opportunity to
shape new development goals that could apply
more universally to Ireland, the EU and the
wider world. Over the second half of the Irish EU
Presidency the EU must decide on its position in
relation to what should follow the Millennium
Development Goals when they expire in īīīī.
The European Commission has published a
Communication that usefully proposes that any
new framework of goals should be universal and
apply to all countries. The Communication high-
lights the need to bring together the economic,
social and environmental dimensions of sustain-
able development. It seeks a focus on the ādrivers
for inclusive and sustainable growth, within
planetary boundariesā. It proposes the objective
of providing āA decent life for allā. This has the
potential to address some of the deļ¬ciencies in
the current goals.
Inevitably, however, the market rears its
ugly head. The European Commission empha-
sises the need for structural transformation āto
allow for market-friendly open economiesā. This
is transformation then to enable the same unfet-
tered market that has brought us environmental
destruction and gross inequalities between coun-
tries and within countries. The Communication
contradicts its promise with this short phrase.
Equality gets mentioned in the Communication.
It states that the āframework should also address
justice, equality and equityā because they are vital
for inclusive and sustainable development and
important values in their own right. However,
there remains a challenge to make equality central
to the wider approach espoused by the European
Commission.
The Irish Government should seek to build on
these European Commission proposals by:
l Establishing equality as central to all goals
set, focusing attention on the redistribution
of resources and of power and inļ¬uence;
l Championing a role for the state in relation to
both economic and social development;
l Empowering civil society and encour-
aging organisations that promote the
interests of those who experience poverty
and inequality.
A deliberative event, āSetting Goals for a Better
Ireland in a Just Worldā, in the RDS in Dublin on
the īīth April proposes to explore and develop
an agenda that should be advanced by the Irish
Government. It is organised by Claiming Our
Future with DĆ³chas and the Wheel. Information
is available on www.claimingourfuture.ie.
It would be useful for such an event to explore
and deļ¬ne a new rights-based approach to devel-
opment as a basis for these new goals. In such an
approach peopleās needs are identiļ¬ed in terms
of rights. They are empowered to know their
rights and enabled to seek a fulļ¬lment of their
rights. After all, the fulļ¬lment of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights would go fur-
ther than anything oļ¬ered by the Millennium
Development Goals.
niall crowley
politics
UN goals promote capitalism
and ignore inequality
Ireland could use its EU Presidency to facilitate a more equitable replacement
The Millennium Development
Goals sit easily with the neo-
liberal economic project