
6 November/December 2020
fair share”. Beginnin’ to ask the rich to pay their
pay share won’t be fast enough. We’ll soon be
sick of him.
Scrapin’ in Scranton
Until Biden was 12 he lived in Scranton, Penn-
sylvania’s Kinnegad. Secretly he then moved to
posh Delaware though to be fair it was the worst
part of it. He says “90 percent of my class mates
identified themselves as Irish. The centerpiece
of life in Scranton was the church, the nuns, the
priests, and the monsignor. Vocations were a big
deal. I was Irish to the point that my dad used
to get angry at times. He’d say, ‘Your mother’s a
Robinette, you’re part French’ I always used to
say, ‘No, I’m Irish’…Aunt Gertie would say, ‘Now
you remember, Joey, about the Black and Tans,
don’t you?’. She had never seen the Black and
Tans, for the Lord’s sake but she could recite
chapter and verse about them”.Villager thinks
this is all a bit hopeless but at least it’s likely to
spawn grief for perfidious Boris Johnson.
Nominative determinism
Steven Gallant ungallantly murdered an ex-
firefighter in Hull in 2005, earning 17 years in
the clink but has obtained the Queen’s Pardon
for leading the gallant assault on Isis’s London
Bridge knife attacker – who killed two people
- with a toothpick, narwhal tusk or some such.
Judging judge
Igor Judge, Baron Judge Kt PC, is the former Lord
Chief Justice in England and Wales who is in
-
flamed by the Internal Market Bill, which would
allow British ministers to renege on parts of
the Brexit withdrawal agreement. Judge Judge
judges that “the damage is to the UK’s standing
in the world”.
Judge not…
So Susan Denham spoke to Seamus Woulfe on
the basis of strict confidentiality. She then for
-
warded her report on his shenanigans and his
boorish view of his (non)-culpability to the Chief
Justice who forwarded it to the Judicial Council
which published it in full. This is brilliant legal
sleight from our legal elite. Technically Mr Jus
-
tice Woulfe has an enormous action for breach of
confidence but how realistically could he pursue
it? The judge was damned. Villager predicts that
the poor mans illness will overtake his continu
-
ance on the Supreme Court and only hopes he
holds on to the €224,000 salary he’s been earn
-
ing, doing nothing, since July, and his pension.
Incidentally is Sue Denham a
pseudonym?
A snake taken out by a
cockroach
When the current editor took over this magazine
one of the first things he did for some reason
was to oer a fruitless reward for information
about how Declan Ganley was funding the anti-
Lisbon Treaty outfit, Libertas.
The anomalously Euro-indulgent editor was
fresh from a campaign promoting the need to
deal with climate change in the run-up to the
2007 general election. As part of that he has ad
-
mitted being involved in facilitating the trailing
of delinquent Environment Minister Dick Roche
by a costumed apocalyptic cock (i.e. Dick) roach
which finished up getting beaten up under the
railway bridge in Bray.
Village ran an aggressive factual piece by Kevin
Barrington suggesting Ganley had covertly in
-
serted a clause into a contract with the police in
Iraq, and in which Dick Roche, by now Minister
for Europe, called Ganley “a liar, a self-mythol
-
ogiser, a snake-oil salesman”, and accused him
of lying: “There is no way Ganley can keep the
lid on such a catalogue of lies and dirty deeds”.
Ganley sued for defamation.
The editor and Roche became best mates for
a week, with no small-minded mention of in
-
sects and Roche’s Ministerial Eurolimo parked
outside the Village oce while Roche decanted
the best information the government could lay
hands on into adavits for the magazine.
In April 2009 Ganley agreed in the High Court to
withdraw proceedings.
Village paid no costs or damages to Ganley and
the article and its imputations remained on the
shelves, despite Ganley’s threats to have it re
-
moved.
Village agreed to publish an interview with Gan
-
ley but the interviewer Ganley in the end insisted
on, Mr Bruce Arnold, submitted a piece which
gave no evidence he had interviewed Ganley
for Village, but was instead a scraping paean
to him. Village published it anyway, though it
didn’t pay the pompous Arnold as his article was
a travesty. In other words Ganley couldn’t get Vil
-
lage to withdraw its serious allegations despite
his aggressive legal action.
Subsequently he sued RTÉ. Ganley claimed a
‘Prime Time’ programme implied he had falsely
claimed to be a paid adviser to the Latvian gov-
ernment; was somehow involved in the death of
Kosta Tribecka with whom he had a close busi
-
ness relationship; caused a fund to lose the life
savings of thousands of Albanian pensioners
and was covertly working for the CIA and/or an
“ill-defined group” known as ‘Neocons’”.
RTÉ denied defamation. On 22 October 2020 RTE
apologised. It said it stood over the journalism
of the programme but “accepts unreservedly as
stated on the programme that the death of Mr
Tribecka was wholly unrelated to Mr Ganley or
any business related to him”. The apology was
limited in scope but it was reported by the un
-
reliable John McGuirk, long-time Ganley acolyte,
on Gript.ie, that “They have agreed to pay a sub
-
stantial sum in damages, plus the costs of both
parties”.
On the other hand, a statement released by Gan
-
ley’s solicitors merely declared he was happy
with the apology and “the financial agreement
reached” but did not refer to damages.
Green on the law
The problem with Irish environmental law is not
its existence or the amount of it, but its quality.
And in particular its enforceability. A lot of the
legislation the Greens introduced in 2007-11
simply added to the edifice of under-enforced
existing legislation. This enabled them to claim
credit for introducing legislation rather than any
actual real eects. So, for example, various wor
-
thy Planning Acts and regulations did nothing to
stop the pattern of sprawl of Dublin into Leinster
and one-o-housing. Then as now it would be
better to focus on making current laws enforce
-
able. We can’t rely on politicians or on ocials,
local or national, so there has to be the possibil
-
ity of citizens or dedicated NGOs taking action
where laws are flouted. It’s called justiciability.
A big word and a big concept, though not di
-
cult. It is inexcusably misleading for the Greens
to say the Climate Act is legally binding when
its ‘legality’ means nothing. A Department being
legally bound to do something is meaningless
since failure is not actionable.
A recent action by Friends of the Irish Environ
-