ī˜Šī˜‘ ā€” ī˜Ÿī˜žī˜ī˜ī˜œī˜›ī˜š March - April 2012
Browne-nosing
Dermot Desmond has been pursuing Vincent
Browne for years about libel.
A testosterone-fuelled action was settled in
the High Court in ī˜Ÿī˜ī˜Šī˜ over an article written
by Browneā€™s favourite journalist, Ursula Halligan,
now of TVī˜’, in Magill in January ī˜Šī˜‹ī˜‹ī˜Œ, when
Browne was editor.
As part of the settlement, an apology was read
out: ā€œInsofar as the article concerned gives rise to
the inference or innuendo that Dermot Desmond
and/or NCB were the beneļ¬ciaries of contracts
awarded to NCB by the State as a direct result of,
or in consideration, alleged payments made by
Dermot Desmond to Charles J Haughey, this is
regretted by Vincent Browneā€.
Browne accepted the contracts were awarded
on merit and that the oļ¬€ending statements
should not be repeated.
Desmond also threatened to sue over an arti-
cle written in Village in ī˜Ÿī˜ī˜ī˜ by Browne and
Justine McCarthy ā€œessentially inferring that I
did not do my job properly as Chairman of Aer
Rianta; that I did a favour for Ciaran Haughey
and indirectly Charlie Haugheyā€ and ā€œinsultinglyā€
claiming Haughey felt Desmond neglected him
socially in the years before his death.
All a far cry from ī˜Ÿī˜ years ago when Browneā€™s
tenure as editor of the Sunday Tribune
was terminated by another
Alpha plus, Tony Ryan, of
GPA and then Ryanair:
Dermot Desmond appar-
ently expressly called the
Tribune to make it clear he
would not be placing any
advertising, in sympathy with
our dislodged hero.
Doubtless Desmond believes
Browne has oļ¬€ended, though
there does seem to be an element of
keeping Browne on his toes since the
aļ¬€air has dragged out into a third
decade. And Vincent does have
a history of Alpha Men getting
on his wick. Villager believes
that all these Titans actually love each other,
though they have the usual diļ¬ƒculties express-
ing their manly feelings. Villager is on hand for
mediation as required.
Anyway, before Christmas, Browne, Justine
McCarthy and Desmond were ā€˜seen diningā€™
together in Shanahanā€™s of the Green, Dublinā€™s
most expensive restaurant. What could they have
been talking about?
Under-audited Red Cross
The DƔil Committee of Public Accounts is con-
templating inviting Village hero, Noel Wardick,
to contradict evidence it heard from the Irish
Red Cross (IRC), led by former AIB Ireland MD,
DĆ³nal Forde. Wardick claims the IRCā€™s Central
Council members should rotate and that funds
for the Haiti appeal in ī˜Ÿī˜ī˜Šī˜ were misallocated.
He is scathing of the IRCā€™s failure to audit its
branches.
Gorgeous genius
Farewell then Aengus Fanning. According to eight
of your colleagues writing at length in your news-
paper you were a genius not just at editing but at
cricket, jazz and family, and you had, according to
Barry Egan, ā€œļ¬lm-star good looksā€. You were, said
Anthony Cronin, ā€œuntouched by the corrupting
forces of Irish journalism. Which are cynicism and
its obverse, sentimentalityā€. It was left to clumsy
Geraldine Kennedy to tell Marian Finucane that
she didnā€™t like what heā€™d done to journalism. The
Sindo under Fanning was a clever product, which
often showed up some of its more worthy compet-
itors in the quality of its investigation as well as
in the ambition of some of its analysis, including
cultural analysis. But it got Irish readers used to
women gratuitously taking bits of their kit oļ¬€; and
it promoted some evil views and campaigns, such
as the one seeking reductions in stamp duty. One
Sindo journalist told Villager polymath Fanning
was a bollix and always called him Jim (which is
not even his name). Still, good luck to his griev-
ing widow, Anne Harris (who comes ī˜‰ī˜Œth in our
Inļ¬‚uential List), one of the shrewdest in the busi-
ness, who succeeds him.
Labour Dialectic ā€“ Higgins v Howlin
Villager was always sceptical about the pas-
sion and ideologies of anyone whoā€™d surrender
themselves to the high but inert oļ¬ƒce of Ceann
Comhairle or even, as in the case of Brendan
Howlin (ī˜Ÿī˜ī˜ī˜Ž-ī˜Ÿī˜ī˜Šī˜Š), Leas Ceann Comhairle.
Anyway, the incumbent Labour Minister for
Public Expenditure has just announced the assets
the Government has identiļ¬ed for disposal, as
demanded by the EU-IMF troika. Bord GĆ”isā€™s
energy business and some of the ESBā€™s ā€œnon-
strategic power generation capacityā€ will be
sold. Consideration will be given to the sale of
some assets of Coillte ā€“ excluding land ā€“ and of
the Stateā€™s remaining ī˜Ÿī˜‰ per cent stake in Aer
Lingus.
Contrast this with our increasingly conļ¬-
dent and occasionally subversive new President
who, in a recent address to the London School
of Economics, quoted Richard Powell as follows:
ā€œPrivatisation is the road back to autocracy, in
which a hollowed-out state is bereft of anything
meaningful to attract the support of the citizen
ā€“ especially the marginalised, excluded from the
mainstream of societyā€. Former Labour stal-
wart Michael D, if we can still call him that, later
claimed that: ā€œto walk away from the State would
be a tragic error on the part of those who seek an
emancipatory transformation in our societiesā€.
Higgins also has a recurring bee in his bonnet
about our underperforming ā€œintellectualsā€, who-
ever they are.
NĆ­os MĆ³
Replying to Kevin Humphreys in the DƔil,
Minister Jimmy Deenihan revealed a wide
range of remuneration and expenses for agen-
cies funded by his Department of Arts, Heritage
and the Gaeltacht ā€“ with the Chester Beatty
Library and National Archives advisory board
claiming no remuneration; the NCH and IMMA
claiming ā‚¬ī˜Œ, ī˜‹ī˜Žī˜Œ for their chair and nothing
for board members; other established agencies
like the National Gallery, National Museum, Arts
Council and Film Board claiming ā‚¬ī˜Œ, ī˜‹ī˜Žī˜Œ for
their chair and ā‚¬ī˜‰,ī˜‹ī˜Œī˜‰ for board members; and
villager
Villager