Archives

OK

Random entry RSS

Loading

  • Posted in:

    Irish Times struggles with non-Catholic abuse

    In 2001 Irish Times reporter Carol Coulter wrote a short article outlining allegations of abuse affecting Smyly’s Church of Ireland Children’s Home. The report referred to preparation of a report by the health board. What the report said and indeed whether it was written were never reported. The paper did not investigate further. On 16 January 2003 Coulter commented on: “…the stereotypical treatment of our longest-standing minority, the Protestant community, which has been presented as a homogenous group whose minority status somehow puts it beyond any criticism or analytical discussion”. Coulter, who was from a Protestant small-farming background in the west of Ireland, is now Director of the Child Care Law Reporting Project and Adjunct Professor in the School of Law, NUI Galway. She further observed: “In college I was puzzled, and sometimes irritated, by the distorted and extraordinarily benign view my Catholic friends had of the Protestant community in Ireland… [It did] not accommodate differences in historical origin, geography or class. It glosse[d] over the undeniably unpleasant aspects of this history, like the disproportionately powerful grip a section of the Protestant community held, up into the 1960s, on swathes of the Irish economy, and the religious bigotry which surfaced from time to time. Nor d[id] it accommodate the reality of the economically underprivileged in the community”. Coulter noted of a neighbour’s child sent to a Dublin orphanage, due to her mother being unable to manage financially on a small farm after her husband’s death: “… this girl was now the beneficiary of Protestant ‘charity’, and would be trapped in this exclusive environment at the lowest level of its rigid hierarchy, destined to work at the bottom of the service industry, often run by prosperous members of the same religion”. In the course of researching the untold story of marginalised southern Protestants, I met ‘John’, another victim of this process. He was the institutionalised son of a Protestant unmarried mother. After birth in 1946 in the Church of Ireland Magdalen Home, its associated Nursery Rescue Society farmed him out, literally. John became a free agricultural labourer from the age of five, offered to families masquerading as foster parents, who treated him appallingly. For example, Christmas Day typically consisted of eating scraps separately from his ‘family’, and receipt of a colouring book and crayons as a ‘present’. Approximately six other similar children he knew during the 1950s and 1960s descended into a life of poverty, depression, alcohol and drug misuse. Deeply affected and profoundly depressed by physical and emotional knocks that kept on coming (discovering at age 58 a separated twin sister, adopted in Northern Ireland), only he survived to tell the tale. John’s is one of many such stories, largely hidden. As Coulter noted also in her 2003 piece: “While the backgrounds and situations of the [Roman Catholic] children in […] industrial schools received widespread public discussion, no one thought to inquire about the children in Protestant orphanages. Where did these children come from? Why were they there? If these children did have living family members, why were they in institutions? None of these questions were asked, as if they fell outside the known boundaries of public discourse about Catholic and non-Catholic, rich and poor, privileged and marginalised, into which the other discussion of the children’s institutions fell”. These were, assuredly, important questions, contributed on the basis of personal and professional experience, in a newspaper that was a product of the community about which Coulter wrote. Her reference to “prosperous members of the same religion” could encapsulate the work of 1959-74 Irish Times Chairman Ralph Walker. He was involved in the regulation of unmarried mothers and their abandoned children in the Protestant evangelical Bethany Home, through his legal firm, Hayes and Sons. In addition, his father sat on Bethany’s Managing Committee, while his aunt ran it. The Irish Times The Irish Times is considered one of the more open and accessible newspapers. It was originally the newspaper of business interests within a relatively privileged Protestant and mainly pro-British unionist minority, the remnant of a colonial ruling elite. After partition came into effect in 1922, the numerically declining Protestant population adapted to life in an overwhelmingly Roman Catholic and Irish nationalist 26-County state. However, residual privileges remained intact, largely preserved by protectionist economic policies. Despite dire predictions, Roman Catholics generally had no interest in doing to Protestants what had been done, historically, to them, and continued to tolerate widespread employment discrimination. Under its last Protestant Editor Douglas Gageby (1963-74 and 1977-86) and in line with the progressive evolution of southern Protestant attitudes, the paper became a recognisably Irish nationalist, liberal and also pluralist newspaper. Gageby’s Irish Times’ nationalism and republicanism were nurtured as he grew up in 1930s Belfast. He was influenced by the “broad, generous doctrine” he encountered in editor Frank Gallagher’s new Irish Press newspaper. Under Gageby, the paper experienced a steadily rising circulation, attracting liberal Catholic, left-wing, and republican readers. They were disenchanted with the southern state’s facilitation of the Roman Catholic Church’s overweening conservative influence. In helping to effect change, the newspaper became a recognisable pillar in the post-1960s modernisation of southern Irish society. It was not a seamless transition. When the Northern Ireland Troubles broke out, then managing director Major Thomas McDowell and ‘friends on the board’ intrigued against Gageby and some of his reporters. After offering his services to the British government, in October 1969 McDowell advised the British Ambassador that Gageby, though “an excellent man”, was on Northern Ireland matters “a renegade or white nigger”. When news of this racist-sectarian epithet emerged in 2003, McDowell denied he had used it, though it is clear he had betrayed the newspaper’s trust. In 1974, partly in response to political volatility introduced by the conflict, the Irish Times Trust was set up, largely under McDowell’s control. Existing directors, including Gageby, were bought out. Gageby retired as editor, though he came back in 1977, due to an editorial and financial crisis. The Irish Times still operates within

    Loading

    Read more

  • Posted in:

    Life experience not needed

    In 2007, as the spin-heavy, scandal-bruised Blair era came to a close, British journalist Peter Oborne published a harsh polemic titled ‘The Triumph of the Political Class’. The book describes the rapid growth of a professionalised cabal of career politicians in the UK from the late 1970s onwards – a self-interested clique more devoted to perpetuating long, lucrative careers than to unselfish public service. Inspired by the work of Gaetano Mosca, an early twentieth-century Italian political theorist, Oborne’s analysis of this problematic development has been repeatedly vindicated as Britain’s confidence in its politicians continues to plummet. Although Oborne dubiously concludes that the solution to the corrosion of British public life is to return to the safety of government by a mythical, highly moral and disinterested elite drawn from the traditional establishment, his identification of the career structure of modern careerist politicians is accurate nonetheless, and provides some insights on recent parallel developments in Ireland. It is worth analysing how Irish politics, always a hyper-local closed-shop, is now prey to the professionalisation of politics, and the associated problems, as Ireland’s political elite in general does little to represent the views of its constituents. Oborne describes, step by step, the well-travelled career budding British politician should follow. First, study at Oxbridge, preferably PPE at Oxford, and immerse yourself in the youth wing of your chosen party. After graduation, become a journalist or a researcher to an MP, then a special advisor, and perhaps briefly a think-tank researcher or corporate lobbyist. All going well, the party leadership will add you to the A-list, parachuting you into a safe seat by the age of thirty. Thence you can start your (hopefully swift) ascent to the cabinet. Politicians who have followed this advice to the letter include David Cameron, George Osborne, the Miliband brothers, Nick Clegg, Boris Johnson, Michael Gove, Ed Balls, Yvette Cooper and Andy Burnham. While Ireland lacks the size and political infrastructure necessary to systematically facilitate such regimented career paths, the blueprint for young politicos here is almost as straightforward. First, join your chosen party at a young age. Ideology is not a major factor in party politics, and so longevity, loyalty and graft matter above all. Next, choose your constituency, move there, and never leave. In fact, ideally you have been born there and only left for three or four years to go to college (where you spent every spare minute with your party’s youth branch, far away from actual political activity on campus). Unlike your British counterparts, you have to foster a strong local connection with your constituency due to proportional multi-seat constituencies, which don’t allow for ‘safe’ seats to be handed to favoured out-of-towners by party elders. To build this stock, run in local elections, early and often if needs be. This is the surest way of building your profile, and of gaining renown within the party and local area. 38 of the 52 TDs elected for the first time in 2016 previously served as county, city or town councillors, illustrating how crucial local experience is in getting to the Dáil. “The Political Class is distinguished from earlier governing elites by a lack of experience of and connection with other ways of life. Members of the Political Class make government their exclusive study. This means they tend not to have significant experience of industry, commerce, or civil society”. Of course, deputies emerging from the ranks of county councils are nothing new. A more recent development in the make-up of Ireland’s political class is an explicit devotion to politics as an independent vocation. An increasing number of TDs have little to no experience outside the political bubble: of the 52 first-timers elected in 2016, one in four is a member of this newly professionalised political class – that is, careerists who have worked almost exclusively as political advisors, parliamentary assistants, appointed senators, and party or union apparatchiks. The Dáil still houses plenty of teachers, barristers, solicitors, pharmacists, accountants and publicans, but an increasing number of TDs have already spent most of their adult life working at Leinster House. While the road to the Irish cabinet is more parish-pump than PPE, and more Fleadh Cheoil than Financial Times, this increasingly common career path is no less damaging to the quality of our political discourse than its British equivalent. A TD who has spent their entire career within the Oireachtas bubble is unlikely to fully represent or empathise with the concerns of most of their constituents. This is especially true since a professional politician’s priority is staying within that bubble, not only as a matter of public service, but also as a matter of survival. Members of the new political class have no career to return to should they fail to be reelected, because politics is their career. While many members of Ireland’s old political elite are solicitors or teachers in name only, at least these professions have some connection, however tenuous, to the “real” world outside politics. The professionalisation of the political class is eroding this concept, further increasing the already yawning gap between the Irish electorate and their representatives. In keeping with this, whereas once the youngest TDs were scions filling an unexpected vacancy in the family seat (think Enda Kenny, Brian Cowen, Máire Geoghegan-Quinn or Mary Coughlan), the Dáil’s freshest faces are now consummate careerists, who display a uniform lack of experience outside of the political realm. Fine Gael’s Noel Rock (elected at 27) worked as a parliamentary assistant in Dublin and Brussels for almost his entire pre-parliamentary career, and first ran in local elections at 21; Sinn Fein’s Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire (27) was a political advisor to his party’s Oireachtas members; and Fianna Fail’s Jack Chambers (25), a county councillor at 23, was once a summer intern at Arthur Cox. These men follow in the footsteps of other recent Babies of the House, like Simon Harris and Lucinda Creighton, both of whom had equally short or non-existent careers outside of politics before winning a seat. This phenomenon

    Loading

    Read more

  • Posted in:

    PACing up

    As public hearings at the Public Accounts Committee into the controversial sale of the Project Eagle portfolio of distressed assets in Northern Ireland and Britain come to a close, its members are facing some difficult choices with potentially serious political implications. However, the absence of key individuals who have declined invitations to give evidence, including of former Northern Ireland first minister, Peter Robinson, his former finance minister Sammy Wilson, Ian Coulter of Tughans Solicitors in Belfast, as well as of some unsuccessful bidders for the €4.5bn property portfolio (sold for €1.6bn to Cerberus) will make it extremely problematic to make definitive conclusions on a number of matters. Even more complicating is the absence from hearings of the former member of the Northern Ireland Advisory Committee of NAMA (NIAC), Frank Cushnahan, and of the agency’s former head of asset recovery, Ronnie Hanna, both of whom have cited the ongoing criminal investigations in the UK by the National Crime Agency as reasons for their absence as witnesses. Without this pair, it is arguable that the final report and conclusions can only rely on a great level of speculation as to the real motivation behind the decision by the eventual successful bidders, Cerberus, in paying a £15m success fee to be divided between US law firm Brown Rudnick, Tughans and Cushnahan which of course is the most dramatic and questionable aspect of the entire Project Eagle saga. The PAC inquiry is based on the finding of a report from the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), Seamus McCarthy that NAMA could have secured some €220m more from the sale of the mainly NI-based assets, that it applied a greater than expected discount to the buyer and that it failed properly to investigate a series of apparent conflicts of interest involving key figures in the transaction. The committee is restricted to the parameters of the comprehensive and detailed CAG report and to the broad question of whether NAMA delivered the Irish people ‘value for money’ from the purchase. But what has emerged from the public hearings goes much further than this and opens up a truly appalling vista if it emerges in time, following the various investigations in the UK and the US, and by the Bureau of Fraud Investigation in the Republic, that the executives and board of NAMA failed to uncover an attempt by a small number of key insiders, in business and politics, in the North to enrich themselves at the expense of the state agency. This was the thrust of the sensational claims by Mick Wallace TD when he revealed the £15m success-fee arrangement, in the Dáil in July 2015 and in much of the subsequent debate in the House and at the Committee hearings into the controversy while it is also central to the demand by the opposition parties, including a somewhat reluctant Fianna Fáil, for a full-scale Commission of Investigation into the Project Eagle purchase and sale. When and what NAMA knew about the details of this success fee were at the heart of the most recent hearings of the PAC when further questions were put to its chairman Frank Daly and chief executive Brendan McDonagh about this crucial issue that goes to the heart of how the property management agency dealing with billions in distressed assets across Ireland, the UK, the EU and US has dealt with its awesome responsibilities. Under robust questioning by several committee members including Josepha Madigan of Fine Gael, Mary Lou McDonald and David Cullinane of Sinn Féin and independent, Catherine Connolly on 24 November, the NAMA executives were put to the pin of their starched collars to explain how Frank Cushnahan could have been seeking purchasers for the Project Eagle assets as far back as November 2012 without any senior executive of the agency knowing about his activities. Cushnahan met Brown Rudnick along with Ian Coulter to discuss the idea of finding a buyer for the entire NI property portfolio in late 2012. Cushnahan represented six debtors, mainly in Belfast, who made up more than 50% of the entire bundle of distressed commercial property and residential assets and had declared some of these interests under NAMA compliance requirements. It has emerged in recent correspondence from PIMCO, the US fund which was forced to withdraw from the sales process in March 2014 after it revealed to NAMA that Cushnahan was to share in the three way £15m success fee. Pimco has also claimed that it was approached by Brown Rudnick and introduced to Cushnahan in April 2013. PIMCO also asserts that Cushnahan set up a meeting for PIMCO with the NI first minister Peter Robinson and finance minister Sammy Wilson a few weeks later, in May 2013. PIMCO also confirmed in a letter in early November last to the PAC that it was approached by Brown Rudnick in June 2013 about a success fee, one third of which was to go to Cushnahan. PIMCO went on to claim that it sought assurances from Brown Rudnick, whose then partner Tuvi Keinan was leading its effort to secure the Project Eagle portfolio, as to whether NAMA had been informed of, and approved, the involvement of Cushnahan in the planned deal. During all of this time, and until 7 November 2013, Cushnahan was a member of the NIAC which was chaired by Frank Daly and which sometimes held its meetings in the offices of Tughans solicitors in Belfast, where Cushnahan occupied an office. The NAMA executives claim that none of these meetings or requests were raised by PIMCO as it entered into discussions to purchase Project Eagle between September and December 2013. The discussions followed a request by Wilson in a letter to his Dublin counterpart Michael Noonan to consider PIMCO’s request to buy the entire NI portfolio of NAMA in an exclusive deal that would not involve the normal open tendering process. The board of NAMA did not agree to this exclusivity requirement but allowed PIMCO to access the virtual data room which provided details

    Loading

    Read more

  • Posted in:

    Trumping science

    The new American President is post-science just as he is post-truth. His number one environmental priority is to cancel the Paris Climate Agreement, not uncoincidentally the number one environmental priority for environmentalists.

    Loading

    Read more