Archives - Page 11 of 491 - Village Magazine

Posted in:

As predator George Gibney is extradited: what really happened

by admin 22 July, 2025

Nailing the institutional culprits, ignored by Ireland’s deficient media By Irvin Muchnick In Ireland’s public square, I now ask yet again: “Why was Gibney living in Florida and who sponsored his Green Card?” The long-elusive goal of a second prosecution of at least some of George Gibney’s countless alleged sexual abuses of young swimmers now seems imminent. The next stage is whether the media in Ireland deign to take the story deeper. Custom and practice suggest the prognosis is not promising. Mark Horgan’s podcast Where Is George Gibney? did succeed in notching Gibney. Unfortunately, a lot of important stuff has been either left on the cutting-room floor or ignored entirely. Taoiseach Micheál Martin’s remarks that it was this series that got this over the top spiked decades of advocacy by, among others, swimming star Gary O’Toole and journalists Johnny Watterson and Justine McCarthy. ‘Prime Time’ had questioned Gibney in a California car-park as long ago as 2006 As a result of Horgan’s 2020 series, which was broadcast by the BBC and Second Captains, fresh faces came forward to gardaí, grounding an indictment drawn up by the Director of Public Prosecutions for 78 counts of sexual assault and one of attempted rape. In October of last year the Irish embassy in Washington, D.C., submitted an extradition request. And on 1 July this year, the one-time Olympic swimming coach was fitted for handcuffs and return, more than 30 years after his first prosecution got scuttled by now-discredited statute-of-limitations case-law. For the survivors of the newly alleged incidents, there is palpable relief. A trial will also be hygienic for the entire community of Gibney victims – some of them now dead, of whom at least one was by suicide. As the grimly cynical maxim goes, no well-connected predator meets his match without the emergence of “a live boy or a dead girl.” One live boy, Chalkie White, was a root whistleblower whose testimony now reaches back to events more than a half century ago. Almost incredibly, and in an illustration of the depraved reach of the republic of Gibneystan, another accuser of serial molestation was White’s sister Loraine Kennedy – alleging abuse when she was nine years old. I had the privilege of dining with that grand lady, in Dublin months before her 2019 death from cancer. Generally I prefer the term “predator” to “paedophile” which often gets appropriated by homophobes. But sometimes the shoe fits snugly. In my 2016-17 Freedom of Information Act case over whether Gibney’s privacy rights were outweighed by the public’s interest in cracking open his American immigration file, US federal judge Charles R Breyer delivered the defining analysis. “I have to assume”, Breyer said, “that if somebody has been charged with the types of offences that Mr Gibney has been charged with, the United States, absent other circumstances, would not grant a visa. We’re not a refuge for paedophiles”. Breyer’s utterance from the bench, in combination with the most basic artificial intelligence mashup via Google, will probably tell you more about where the Gibney narrative needs to turn in 2026 than the entirety of the mainstream Irish coverage of scandalously delayed — and so justice-denying — court proceedings. More than a decade ago, the headline over my first blog post on this sordid subject posed basic questions that remain not only unanswered but also unexplored, in both Ireland and the US. On the Irish side, this is sadly characteristic of the national style in the agonising space of historical abuse in high places. A victory lap by the Irish Times crowd always seems to replace the incommodious task of shining the klieg light of accountability on sports overseers, law enforcement and governments. In Ireland’s public square, I now ask yet again: “Why [Was] George Gibney – No. 1 At-Large Paedophile in Global Sports – Living in Florida? And Who Sponsored His Green Card?”. The BBC, Irish Times and RTÉ avoid contemplating the larger lessons and squash offshoot stories. They do not foster the investigative journalism that would generate challenging lessons In the generous interpretation, the podcast’s confinement by the parameters of its brand of storytelling precluded such a deep dive. In the less generous interpretation, the terms of engagement for underwriter BBC – like those of the Irish Times, RTÉ and many other institutions with the resources to do better – annul contemplation of how hard cases make for larger lessons. They squash offshoot stories by atomising and sentimentalising core narratives. They do not foster the investigative journalism that could render our takeaways less domesticated, more explicit and more challenging. ***** To date, the defunct alternative site Broadsheet.ie (whose archives, happily, can still be accessed), starting in 2016, and Village, starting with my piece here in 2022, remain the only Irish outlets that have shared with news consumers certain relevant facts surrounding the determining official lapse in the Gibney saga. That would be the 1994 three-justice Supreme Court technical ruling which effectively scuttled Gibney’s 27-count indictment. One of the judges was Susan Denham, later, of course, the Chief Justice. She is the sister of Patrick Gageby, who was Gibney’s barrister. Not until 2019 were Ireland’s judicial ethics guidelines reformed to say that judges should not consider cases involving close relatives. To a foreign journalist, the principle is intuitive with a capital I. It is a gloss on a Latin formulation: nemo judex in causa sua, or “no one shall be a judge in their own cause”. Yet a number of my Irish friends demur. They have tried to impress upon me that, in a country of only 5 million, where many members of the elite legal stratum inevitably know each other and some are even related, it is not so nefarious that this rule of thumb is, or until recently was, fungible. On that point, you can colour me sceptical. They further point to the protocol that barristers cannot choose the clients on whose behalf they act, if the work is within their area of expertise. In

Posted in:

Deserting as resistance: the Easter Rising’s impact on the Western Front

by Village 30 June, 2025

British military justice backfired in the case of Irish ‘Tommies’ By Brian Flanagan School history teaches that World War I’s causes were complex: Nationalism, Militarism, Imperial ambition and decline. Sometimes the slogans were simpler: ‘the shot heard around the world’, ‘over by Christmas’, and ‘the war to end war’. New research into the Irish experience reveals just how precarious the whole edifice of war, including the State’s monopoly on violence, then was. Over 130,000 Irishmen, Catholic and Protestant alike, volunteered to fight for the then United Kingdom of Britain and Ireland. However, as the war dragged on, Britain’s heavy-handed suppression of the 1916 Easter Rising in Dublin — a rebellion timed to exploit Britain’s military commitments overseas — transformed Irish perceptions of British rule. New research reveals just how precarious the edifice of war, including the State’s monopoly on violence, was Disregarding warnings by Irish parliamentarians, the British authorities executed — by firing squad — the Rising’s leaders. These included the grievously injured James Connolly, himself a British army veteran, whom they tied to a chair. A backlash to these tactics ushered in the War of Independence, through which, by 1921, most of Ireland would exit British rule entirely. A study of the attitudes of Irish WWI volunteers, by Professor Daniel Chen to be published in the Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, in July 2025, shows how decisively Britain’s actions eroded its standing as Ireland’s source of law and order. The British army lost over 700,000 men in Europe’s trench warfare. And there was no escape from the Western Front. Soldiers who fled the fighting were almost invariably caught within a fortnight, court-martialled, convicted and sentenced to death. A decision was then taken — on a seemingly random basis — on whether to implement or commute the soldier’s sentence. Through subjecting the convicts to this ‘pitiless lottery’, British commanders unwittingly created the conditions for a natural experiment by which the deterrent effect of capital punishment could be tested in roughly the same way medical trials test the prophylactic effect of a vaccine. Analysing the impact of executions and commutations on the army’s Irish contingent, Professor Daniel Chen of Harvard University made a remarkable discovery — one which runs counter to historical research that downplays the Rising’s effect on Irish morale. The harshness of British military justice seems to have had the desired effect of deterring indiscipline — in general. On the army’s Irish soldiers, in contrast, it had the opposite effect. Before the Easter Rising, about 17 percent of the unauthorised absences that followed the execution of an Irish soldier involved another Irishman — five points (12 percent) higher than when the soldier’s death sentence was commuted after the Rising, however, the share of absences that followed executions jumped to 23 percent, while that following commutations remained at 12 percent, widening the gap to over double. It appears irrational to be more open to committing a crime if you’ve seen someone else punished, let alone executed, for it. No government expects its people to react in this way. But this was precisely how Britain’s Irish soldiers increasingly came to view the offence of deserting their unit. Self-interest offers little explanation. In refusing to continue to fight for the Crown abroad, a judgement of its legitimacy at home was at work. Sometimes, an execution is just a killing — sometimes, a criminal punishment is just violence. In responding to the executions of their countrymen not with greater compliance but rather with risky defiance, Britain’s Irish volunteers demonstrated the difference—and how quickly one can seem to change into the other. Initially supportive of Britain’s war aims, the Irish poet Francis Ledwidge wrote, “I joined the British Army because she stood between Ireland and an enemy common to our civilisation”. By the time of his death in the Battle of Passchendaele in July 1917, Ledwidge’s confidence had vanished: “If someone were to tell me now that the Germans were coming over our back wall, I wouldn’t lift a finger to stop them. They could come!”. This stark shift was mirrored widely: after the Rising, Irish military recruitment collapsed, and subsequent British attempts to impose conscription faltered. What Chen discovered is that, on the Western Front, Britain’s punishment of Irish revolutionaries at home had the effect of inverting the whole concept of British punishment as a deterrent. The experience of the Irish ‘Tommy’ remind us that the distinction between a legitimate government and a vigilante is always provisional We object to vigilante justice not because the punishment does not fit the crime but because of the punisher’s illegitimacy. We insist, instead, on the rule of law. The Irish volunteers’ reaction to the British punishment of militant republicans tells us that official justice is fragile. The tendency of even the severest punishment to positively encourage disobedience vividly illustrates how swiftly a State’s moral authority can unravel. With Britain’s seeming violation of the implicit trust that had sent Irishmen willingly into battle, desertion became as much an act of political resistance as a military crime. The experience of the Irish ‘Tommy’ reminds us that the distinction between a legitimate government and a vigilante is always provisional. Brian Flanagan is Associate Professor in the School of Law and Criminology at Maynooth University

Posted in:

No judicial drones

by Village 20 June, 2025

Judgment Day coming for AI algorithms, as shown by two recent reportsBy Michael Smith Nearly 40 years ago legal philosopher, Ronald Dworkin, postulated heroic Judge Hercules, an idealised judge with superhuman intelligence and unlimited time. Two impressive recent studies suggest the ideal remains human. Twelve British judges, five from the UK Supreme Court address the challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence Twelve British judges, five of them from the UK Supreme Court, recently addressed an unsettling new Herculean colleague: artificial intelligence. Polls suggest that “judges, judicial support staff, prosecutors, and lawyers around the globe have started to use chatbots. . . to draft. . . judicial decisions, and elaborate arguments”. The judges’ conversations — gathered in a quietly momentous study presented at CHIWORK 2025 — are a rare glimpse into the judicial psyche on the eve of the machine-learning age. The tone is wary, thoughtful, sagacious, occasionally amused — and almost uniformly sceptical. The tone is wary, thoughtful, sagacious, occasionally amused — and almost uniformly sceptical The study, co-authored by researchers from Harvard, Toulouse and Maynooth University, reports how judicial perceptions of how the integration of AI into judicial systems might transform the way judges and legal professionals work. It asks a simple, existential question of lawyers: what, if anything, should AI be allowed to do in a court of law? The judges’ answers are refreshingly human. The paper highlights striking enthusiasm for AI’s efficiency gains alongside deep concern for justice’s human dimension. As background it is important to note that, in contrast to the US Supreme Court, UK Supreme Court judges typically write their judgments by themselves. One participant stated, “There’s no question that anything in a judgment that I hand down will be written by anyone other than me. My judicial assistant will do research for me and maybe give me an analysis of cases, but I will then go to the cases. Similarly, the judicial assistant might produce a chronology, but I will go to the individual documents when I’m writing the judgment”. Judges spoke with understated urgency about what separates mechanical logic from legal judgment: not just facts and rules, not a matter of pure logic, but of practical reasoning, empathy, and above all, moral responsibility: “You’re given the job, not just for intellectual ability, it’s the judgment that you can see that logic is taking you in a direction that you shouldn’t be going and you need a practical, humane result”. Several participants noted that in some types of cases, a human judge is vital to providing emotional and psychological closure, and a sense of “dignity”. You can’t, said another group, “underestimate the catharsis that there is in a trial and the importance of that for peaceful dispute resolution so that the person who loses can say…I understand why I lost”. At the highest levels of the judiciary, writing a judgment isn’t clerical. These judges speak of drafting with the care of novelists, choosing words like tools, shaping arguments to make not just a ruling, but a record of reason. One noted: “When we come out of a case, we all meet together and discuss what we think about it and why. We can’t have a room of robots doing that”. AI, for all its emotionless bluster, doesn’t yet understand the difference between language and thought. Of AI’s ability to articulate the reasoning behind a decision, “AI isn’t really undertaking that process”, one judge noted dryly. And it is prone to a particular sort of error that humans are not, namely, the invention of fictitious legal authorities. Still, the judges aren’t Luddites. They know their courts are clogged, their paperwork Sisyphean, and their resources exhausted. And so they eye the machines with guarded interest. AI could probably help with bulk administrative drudgery, it could summarise documents, flag inconsistencies, or draft plain-English versions of decisions for the public — or, where appropriate, for children. For high volume courts, the initial judgment drafting or summarising of background was considered a potential boost to efficiency and better proofreading would also be helpful. There is also potential for “small claims” and some other types of cases to be fully resolved through AI, with a possible tradeoff between efficiency and quality of judgment. Sentencing was identified as an area that AI could support, as AI could analyse the relevant background information, precedents and additional considerations and make a recommendation. There could be similar support for deciding what would qualify as a fair amount in settlement agreements (e.g. personal injury). Further, many “boring” or bulk administrative tasks were identified as areas in which AI could be beneficial. Legal research and summarisation of cases, disclosures, and bundles of documents was an area of much discussion. “It might even increase access to justice”, one remarked, “at least for the sorts of cases that never make it before a judge anyway”. Context is important. One participant noted: “It’s one thing to have cheap and cheerful AI tool to resolve a £500 dispute over a second hand car sales contract. It’s quite another if somebody’s being sent to prison or somebody’s having their children taken away from them and put into care”. AI stepping into the role of decision-maker — on questions of liberty, custody, guilt or innocence would be too much. Even if the machine were right, it would be wrong. “We want a decision, as a matter of principle, made by a human being”. That insistence is not about sentimentality—it’s about legitimacy. Law, after all, is not only a system of rules. It’s a theatre of authority. Strip away the human element, and you may win efficiency — but you lose the drama, the dignity, and perhaps the consent of the governed under the separation of powers. The Economist has built a bot to predict how the US Spreme Court will rule This is not an idle worry. Across the Atlantic, a less cautious experiment is underway. The Economist, with uncharacteristic glee, has built a bot—SCOTUSbot — to predict how the nine

Posted in:

SIPO’s investigation of Tommy Reilly and Liscarton: a case-study in money, deflection, silence and the collapse of national ethics-gatekeepers

by admin 19 June, 2025

By Frank Connolly a 35-acre site at Liscarton was purchased for €500,000 in 2016 and placed on the market for €4.2m a year later, after rezoning A public inquiry by the Standards in Public Office Commission (SIPO) (13 and 16 June) into the conduct of former Meath County Council Chairperson and Fianna Fáil councillor Tommy Reilly has exposed a system of institutional laxity, media laziness and ethical failure that stretches far beyond the boundaries of Liscarton, near Navan. At the centre of the controversy is a 35-acre site, purchased for €500,000 in 2016 and placed on the market for €4.2 million a year later after the lands were re-zoned from agricultural to light industrial use in July 2017. Planning permission for development was granted in June 2018 by a Council in which Reilly played a key role. In 2017, the National Transport Authority questioned the rationale of developing enterprise activities at a location so far from Navan town centre with few or no public transport services to the site stating: “The new employment zoning at Liscarton is inappropriate as it is contrary to the planning principles set out in Section 7.1.2 of the Transport Strategy”. Two of Reilly’s sons, Ciarán and Tomás, are directors of the company that owns the land. Planning permission was granted in 2018 by Meath County Council in which Reilly played a key role. Two of his sons are directors of the company that owns the land The complaint that brought the case to the attention of SIPO was not made by a political rival, insider, or whistleblower. It was submitted in March 2022 by Village’s editor, Michael Smith, documenting alleged breaches of the Local Government Act and the Lobbying Act, among other laws, primarily on the back of this article by me: https://villagemagazine.ie/meath-council-investigates-potential-conflict-of-interest-in-major-land-re-zoning/. The article revealed how Tommy Reilly attended a number of meetings where the re-zoning of the lands at Liscarton was discussed by members and officials of MCC from 2016 was present at a pre-planning meeting with his son Ciaran and participated at meeting when zoning was approved in July 2017. He withdrew from the meeting but did not disclose the reason for his potential conflict of interest. The NTA questioned the rationale of developing enterprise activities at a location so far from Navan with few public transport services The complaint to SIPO by Smith alleged, inter alia, that “S 4.5 of the Code of Conduct under the 2001 Act also notes that “The 2001 Local Government Act also provides that where a councillor has actual knowledge that a matter is going to arise at a meeting at which s/he will not be present, but if s/he were, a disclosure would be necessary, then in advance of the meeting s/he must make such disclosure in writing to the Ethics Registrar. This provision was breached by Councillor Reilly, as he confirmed to Village that he knew about Ciaran Reilly’s interest when he met him in his son’s shop and canteen in advance of the re-zoning in July 2017. From the beginning, the institutional response has been marked by deflection, minimisation and delay. The SIPO hearing itself was postponed twice, including once following a request by Reilly just before the last local elections. When it finally proceeded in June 2025, media and others were given just four days’ notice, effectively suppressing public awareness. On the first day of the hearing, SIPO unilaterally dropped some of the most serious allegations – including breaches of the Lobbying Act, without consulting the complainant. Smith said “there can be little in life as unrewarding as making a complaint to SIPO”. He said the misery of involving himself in the process was “compounded by the fact that nobody in the media reports accurately what is going on, less still what is at stake”. Reilly, who served on Meath County Council from 1996 until he lost his seat in 2024, portrayed himself as a victim. He told the Commission on Monday, 16th June, that he had been “tortured” for six years, lost his livelihood, and was attacked on social media by what he called a “certain group of political people”. For the first time in 63 years, he claimed, he was asked not to canvass during an election. Reilly stepped down as a candidate for Fianna Fáil in a 2005 Dáil by-election following a controversy involving a land purchase with Frank Dunlop in 1997. At that time, he said he had been the subject of a witch-hunt by sections of the media. In his testimony, Reilly insisted he only learned of his son Ciaran’s interest in the land in early July 2017when his son asked him how he would go about making submissions on the development.. He had asked his son “for what?” and Ciaran had told him he had bought land at Liscarton. Mr Reilly senior said he had been shouting about the “cow plot” at Liscarton for years because he wanted it to be put to community use. There had been so many small businesses in Navan operating from the backs of houses and that had become unsafe. He said he replied to his son that he could have nothing to do with the land and to proceed without him. He had taken no action at that stage but when the date of the meeting came he spoke to an official who told him he did not have to leave the council meeting on 19th July 2017 because he had no financial or other interest in that land at Liscarton. That unnamed official was not held to account for that advice. But he admitted he did not specify the nature of the conflict and failed to update his declaration of interests. “I find it all very confusing”, he said, adding: “My son was involved. I knew that much. Was that not enough?”. The media seemed not to be too concerned whether it was or wasn’t, even though a €3.7m paper profit was in play. The facts suggest it

Posted in:

Sex, power, and consent violations:

by Village 17 June, 2025

Untellable stories from Dublin’s nightlife By Ama Alzaki Let’s be honest: no one tells the full truth about nightlife. Not in Dublin, not anywhere. The headlines skim the surface: “safety on nights out,” “binge drinking”, “harassment in clubs”. But the deeper, messier stories? The ones that live in the blurry space between consent and coercion, pleasure and power, being wanted and being used? Those get buried in silence, shame, and disbelief. But I’ve had it with staying quiet. girls call it “a bad night” because calling it assault would mean facing how often it happens Because behind the sparkle of a Friday night and the rhythm of the DJ, there’s another reality: women waking up unsure if what happened was sex or something else entirely. Girls calling it “a bad night” because calling it assault would mean facing how often it happens. Men whispering apologies they don’t mean. And a city that parties hard while brushing everything else under the rug. I’ve seen it. I’ve lived it. When I first moved to Dublin, going out was the ritual. Every weekend, my friends and I would hit the clubs: shots, drinks from strangers, dancing until our feet hurt. We were out to have fun. But not every night ended with fun. Some nights ended with me waking up next to someone I didn’t know, with no memory of what happened or how I got there. And it wasn’t just because I drank too much. I’ve had nights where the amount I drank didn’t match the total blackout that followed. No images, no flashbacks — just silence. Once, I even fell asleep in a taxi, which I never do, and woke up completely disoriented. I started to wonder if my drink had been spiked. I still don’t know. But the fear that comes with not knowing, that feeling of not being safe in your own body, never leaves you. That’s not paranoia. In 2022 alone, Gardaí recorded more than 100 reports of drink spiking across Ireland. Experts say these numbers are wildly under-reported₁. In a survey conducted by SpunOut.ie, 59 % of young Irish women said they had experienced spiking or knew someone who had₂. Another survey by the Union of Students in Ireland found that 29 % of students believed they had been spiked.₃ “I didn’t bother reporting it. Half my friends told me the guards would never test me in time, so what was the point?”. That is what a 19-year-old respondent told a USI survey₃. That hopelessness isn’t unique to Ireland. A 2024 UK study by Drinkaware and Anglia Ruskin University found that 90 % of people who suspected they were spiked never contacted police — and half of them said they ‘didn’t see the point”4. Karen Tyrell, CEO of Drinkaware, put it bluntly: “Drink spiking is a serious crime that can happen to anyone at any time.”₅ A UK Home Office review of 1,261 police toxicology screens, published in December 2023, underscored the same mismatch: only 5% of suspected spiking samples contained any controlled drug at all, and benzodiazepines such as flunitrazepam (Rohypnol) were “rarely detected”.₁₃ Pop culture often trivialises those fears. British comedian Jimmy Carr once condensed the threat into a single gag—“See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. Rohypnol” —turning a violent crime into a punch line and reminding victims how casually their trauma can be dismissed.₁₄ But it’s not just about spiking. It’s the entire culture. In nightclubs, consent is a joke. A guy groping you as you pass is “normal.” A stranger grinding on you without asking is “expected.” You say no, and suddenly you’re the one ruining the vibe. The minute you walk into a club, your body stops being yours. It becomes part of the scene. We’re told this is freedom, but it’s not. It’s pressure. It’s performance. It’s sex without connection, touch without care, parties without protection. Hook-up culture is sold as empowerment, but for many of us, it feels like survival. And sometimes, survival means pretending you’re okay just to make it out. One night, I left a club around 1 a.m., tired and wanting to avoid the long, expensive taxi ride back to Blanchardstown. While waiting outside, a guy I barely knew offered to let me stay at his place instead. I said yes. At the time, it felt like a relief, a safe escape from the cold and a long commute. I thought I’d crash on the couch or in a spare bed and head home the next morning. But when we got to his flat, it quickly turned. He wanted to have sex. I told him no. I was tired; I just wanted to sleep. But no wasn’t an option to him. He became aggressive, his mood darkening fast. He told me I wasn’t leaving unless we had sex. I realised then that the “help” he offered was always, for him, going to come with strings. I froze. In that moment between no and yes, I understood exactly how powerless I was. The door was locked. He was stronger. I didn’t want to, but I went along with it because I was scared. The sex was rough, violent even. I wasn’t present. I was just trying to get through it so he’d let me go. After, I left shaken and silent. What would I even say? That it wasn’t rape in the way people imagine it? That I had said no, but also didn’t fight back? That I was afraid? That I didn’t scream? That I just wanted to get out? The truth is, I’ve told almost no one about that night until now. Since moving to Cork, I’ve never set foot in a nightclub. Not once. I’ve lived here for over seven years now, and that part of my life is over. The fear, the trauma, the questions that never got answered—they left a mark. It has taken seven years. And I’m not alone. This happens every weekend in Dublin, and in cities

Posted in:

General

Awakening the Sleepwalkers Reason in the age of Trumpian chaos By David Langwallner

by admin 11 June, 2025

I now live in Leatherhead, the beginning and end of H.G. Wells’s prophetic War of the Worlds (1898). Wells summoned a Martian invasion of sleepy Essex in a parable of complacency. In my last substantial contribution to Village, I charted the rise of the far right as a response to the collapse of the neoliberal consensus, the resurgence of racialised myth, and deepening inequality. I warned then that we risked sleepwalking into the abyss. We have sleepwalked into regional wars, economic fragmentation, and environmental crisis. As Arundhati Roy said of ghost capitalism, Gaia herself groans—and she would know, given India’s ravaged ecologies. This essay explores sleepwalking—personal, political, and historical—as a diagnosis of our current condition. Through literature, philosophy, and geopolitics, I argue that the true threat is not the tyrant at the gate but the passivity that lets him in. This essay explores sleepwalking—personal, political, and historical—as a diagnosis of our current condition. Through literature, philosophy, and geopolitics, I argue that the true threat is not the tyrant at the gate but the passivity that lets him in. I. The Metaphor of Sleepwalking Sleepwalking is more than a medical condition. In law and psychiatry, it signifies diminished responsibility—a mind severed from agency. Politically, it evokes inertia: societies dulled by distraction, habituated to fear, or soothed by routine. Huxley’s ‘Brave New World’ (1932) conjures the archetype: a society pacified by pleasure, drugs, and distraction. Bernard Marx, the reluctant dissident, seeks exile in Iceland not to escape, but to think and feel freely. His yearning mirrors our own—our need to disconnect from systems that numb rather than enlighten. II. History repeats: the sleepwalkers of 1914 I must apologise for the unoriginality of my metaphor. Libraries groan with unread volumes for more than a century with the title ‘Sleepwalkers’. I can think of at least six. Christopher Clark’s ‘The Sleepwalkers’ (2014) shows how no one intended World War I — yet all contributed. A chain of miscalculations, rivalries, and hubris led Europe to catastrophe. The parallel with today’s world — in Ukraine, Gaza, Taiwan—is chilling. Escalation becomes default; complexity is erased by binary narratives. Putin’s war, for instance, partly reflects fear of losing the Ukrainian breadbasket—a theme explored by Bulgakov with prophetic clarity. Again, the characters in his ‘The White Guard’ sleepwalk through crisis, trying to cling to a disappearing order. In a nuclear and AI-driven world, the next miscalculation might not lead to trench warfare but instant annihilation. The challenge: to manage crisis without triggering it. As ‘The Fog of War’ (2003) reminded us through Robert McNamara, overreaction is often as dangerous as passivity. III. Ethical decay and the return of brutalism In Hermann Broch’s The Sleepwalkers (1931–32), German society slides into fascism not through dramatic rupture but moral erosion. His character Bertrand, a hollow opportunist, is not exceptional —he is simply what his era produces. So too today. The collapse of ethical boundaries—”profit before people,” governance by algorithm—makes authoritarianism seem rational. Michael Haneke’s ‘The White Ribbon’ (2009) portrays how a brutalised generation becomes ripe for tyranny. Our brutality is digital, but just as dehumanising. Influencers and disinformation merchants understand this. Populism thrives by limiting choice, shaping identities, and feeding fear. There Is No Alternative—TINA—has returned in darker form. IV. Scientific progress, spiritual drift Arthur Koestler’s ‘The Sleepwalkers’ (1959) chronicles Western cosmology’s evolution. The title is double-edged: science has often advanced through intuition, not reason. Today’s technologies—AI, surveillance capitalism, genetic engineering—mirror that ambivalence. They offer promise, but also unprecedented risk. Public discourse has failed to keep up, retreating from ethics, abandoning responsibility. Koestler feared a world where science was severed from values. Jürgen Habermas warns us still: rationality without morality is not progress but peril. V. The modern orcs and their enablers Trump, Putin, Modi, Meloni, Orbán—these figures attract rightful attention. But more dangerous are the enablers: the centrists, bureaucrats, and technocrats who normalise cruelty in the name of order. Broch’s Haguenau, the polished businessman who enables the system, is today’s bureaucrat overseeing deportations or austerity. Karl Kraus, in his 1933 return to publishing with ‘The Third Walpurgis Night’, wrote ascetically: “Of Hitler, I have nothing to say.” His scorn was reserved for Goebbels—and the collaborators. The erosion of norms usually comes not from jackbooted fascists, but, dear reader, from moderates who remain silent. VI. Media collapse and the end of dialogue The digital sphere has obliterated what Habermas called the “ideal speech situation” In place of deliberation, we get outrage, echo chambers, AI-generated philosophy and algorithmic control. Dialogue has become noise. Conspiracy replaces complexity; truth becomes optional. Richard Kearney’s Touch (2021) reminds us what we’ve lost: our interpersonal reality, our shared space. Without shared meaning, politics collapses. We don’t just disagree—we live in different realities. VII. Resisting the drift Yet resistance is possible. Primo Levi, from the inferno of Auschwitz, insisted even small acts matter. Sonny Jacobs who died last week, wrongly imprisoned, spoke of “hope against hope”. Village published my eulogy. Resistance begins with speech, thought, doubt. It requires civic imagination, solidarity, and ethical clarity. We must reject both technocratic fatalism and populist illusion. We must relearn how to disagree. VIII. The need for a new Rationality What we need is not less reason, but better reason—one that includes morality, embraces complexity, and reclaims imagination. In ‘the Structure of Scientific Revolutions ‘(1962), Thomas Kuhn showed that science does not progress through steady, cumulative knowledge, but through paradigm shifts—The shift is now as we face ecological entropy, psychological dystopia digital dehumanisation, and accelerating authoritarianism. These cannot be met with 20th-century ideologies applied by a sleepy elite. We must cultivate wakefulness — not just awareness, but responsibility. To wake is to choose. What we choose now will echo long after us. There is no need for a discarding of reason — we need its moral and intellectual rebirth. A scroll of honour: a call to Enlightenment As Trump seeks to dismantle Harvard, California, due process, the rule of law — and others dismantle democratic norms — let us name those who

Posted in:

General

Boiling doesn’t make them go away

by Village 11 June, 2025

Boiling water contaminated with THMs does not make it safe; it compounds the danger. Ireland is now in clear breach of EU law and permitting a growing risk to public health. By Tony Lowes Uisce Éireann is failing to warn the public about a dual risk: the health threat posed when consumers are told to boil water that is already contaminated with dangerous levels of Trihalomethanes (THMs). That’s the stark message from Friends of the Irish Environment (FIE), which has written to Uisce Éireann, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment, and the Health Service Executive. Boil water notices are being issued in areas where THM levels exceed safe limits and consumers are being advised to boil water without being told that this increases exposure to harmful chemicals Our central concern is this: boil water notices are being issued in areas where THM levels exceed safe limits, and consumers are being advised to bring water to a “vigorous, rolling boil” without being told that this process increases exposure to harmful chemicals. Boiling water contaminated with THMs does not make it safe; it compounds the danger. Ireland is now in clear breach of EU law and a permitting a growing risk to public health. Boiling water contaminated with THMs compounds the danger According to the press release issued by FIE on 10 June 2025, “Ireland has failed in its obligation to provide clean and wholesome water as required by EU law and continues to supply a large number of households with water polluted with toxic chemicals.” This failure is backed up by data from the EPA, which shows that “the number of people served by ‘at risk’ public water supplies has increased again in 2023 to 561,000, up from 481,000. The increase is primarily due to detections of persistent Trihalomethanes [THM] and cryptosporidium.” One in twenty supplies failed to meet the THM standard in 2023 [1]. THMs are a group of more than 60 chemical by-products, including chloroform, created when chlorine added as a disinfectant reacts with organic materials in the water, such as peaty soil. Long-term exposure to elevated levels of THMs has been associated with increased risk of cancer, particularly bladder cancer, and adverse reproductive outcomes such as low birth weight and small-for-gestational-age infants [2, 3]. These risks are amplified in everyday domestic settings through activities such as showering and bathing, which increase both inhalation and dermal exposure to these chemicals. While the HSE maintains that chlorine cannot be reduced without risking bacterial contamination, FIE argues that “the issue can, in fact, be addressed by simple charcoal filters” [4]. Despite this, no systematic provision or recommendation for such filters has been implemented in affected areas. Issuing boil water notices for contaminated supplies without informing the public of these inhalation and dermal risks creates what FIE calls a “dual risk.” Tony Lowes explained that “boiling water with THM poses a significant long-term health hazard by releasing the toxic chemicals into the atmosphere with impacts including an increased risk of bladder cancer.” Scientific research confirms these dangers. Studies show that blood concentrations of THMs can rise five- to fifteen-fold during showering, and bathing and hand dishwashing also significantly increase THM exposure. These results underscore that boiling contaminated water in enclosed environments can, paradoxically, elevate the health risk it is supposed to reduce [2]. Despite these known dangers, Uisce Éireann continues to advise a “vigorous, rolling boil” of water without qualification. The absence of transparent warnings on this compounding risk is a major failure in public health messaging and may expose the State to liability. The problem is not hypothetical. The FIE press release details multiple affected water supplies. A brief boil water notice in Limerick affected 113,764 consumers. Persistent notices continue in: According to the EPA’s Q4 2024 Drinking Water Remedial Action List, 11 of the supplies exceeding permitted THM levels still have no plans for action and are listed as “to be submitted by Uisce Éireann” [5]. FIE notes that this issue was first highlighted in 2016, when the group lodged a complaint with the EU regarding Carraroe, County Galway [7]. The resulting 2024 judgment from the European Court of Justice confirmed that Ireland had breached the Drinking Water Directive. FIE argues that the situation has worsened since that judgment. That judgment, based on years of inaction, detailed how Ireland had failed to adequately monitor, report on, and address chemical contamination in its public water systems. It emphasised the principle of preventative action in EU environmental law, and highlighted how vulnerable communities were being left with unsafe water for years. The Court found that even when remedial action was planned, delays in implementation rendered Ireland non-compliant with its obligations. In some cases, families living in affected areas report relying on bottled water for drinking and cooking for years, at personal expense. In rural areas especially, people on small group water schemes face barriers in accessing filters or alternative supplies. There is frustration, too, at the lack of public engagement. Citizens are rarely consulted on remedial plans, and communication about risks often comes only after media attention or pressure from environmental groups. Comparatively, Ireland’s handling of THM contamination contrasts sharply with the approach taken in other EU member states. In Denmark, for example, water authorities routinely publish detailed chemical profiles of local water, including all THM levels, in public databases updated quarterly. In France, where THM issues were discovered in Brittany, local health authorities launched immediate door-to-door awareness campaigns and offered subsidies for household filters. In both cases, transparency and action reduced risk. By contrast, in Ireland, even basic transparency is lacking. Information is often buried in technical documents or behind freedom of information requests. The EPA’s own remedial action list, while important, gives only high-level overviews with limited narrative. No map of affected zones has been made public, and boil water notices continue to be issued without reference to the chemical profile of the water involved. Moreover, the State’s failure to act is

Posted in:

General

Sunny Jacobs: an appreciation, by David Langwallner

by admin 3 June, 2025

Sonia ‘Sunny’ Jacobs, a beacon of resilience and a tireless advocate for justice reform, passed away at the age of seventy-six in a tragic house fire in Glenmacmurrin, County Galway, Ireland, today June 3, 2025. Also perishing in the blaze was Kevin Kelly, her carer. Her partner Peter Pringle, who I also knew, died in 2023. Born in New York in 1949, Sunny’s life took a harrowing turn in 1976 when she, her partner Jesse Tafero, and their two young children were involved in a fatal incident at a Florida rest stop. A Florida Highway Patrol trooper and a Canadian police officer were killed, leading to Sunny and Jesse’s wrongful convictions for murder. Despite another man, Walter Rhodes, later confessing to the crime, Sunny spent 17 years in prison, including five years on death row in solitary confinement. She was exonerated in 1992, two years after Jesse was executed. Sunny worked closely with the Innocence Project which I founded in Ireland and Europe, and with related organisations across the globe. Despite her increasing immobility she was a forceful presence anywhere she went and very obviously a sunflower child. It was like meeting Gaia, at Woodstock. She was the sotto voce poster girl of the Innocence Project always shunning the limelight even when documentaries were made about her. Her partner Peter Pringle was more bullish. He had been himself one of the last people to be sentenced to death in Ireland before capital punishment was abolished in 1990. His conviction for the murder of two gardaí was quashed in 1995 after he had served 15 years in prison. In her memoir, ‘Stolen Time’, Sunny recounted her experiences with searing clarity. Reflecting on her time in solitary confinement, she wrote: “In a world of one, I am alone, more alone than I have ever been in my life. Locked up in a box within a box where no one can enter, and I cannot leave. I am to await my death.” But even in the depths of despair, she found a spiritual freedom no prison could take. “Hopelessness just did not appeal to me… they can keep me here but what goes on within the confines of these walls is mine to create. They cannot imprison my soul!”. After her release, Sunny dedicated her life to advocating against the death penalty and supporting exonerees. In 1998, she met Peter Pringle, an Irish man who had also been sentenced to death. Their shared experience forged a deep bond, and they married in 2012. Together, they founded The Sunny Centre, a sanctuary for exonerees to heal and rebuild their lives. She participated in public education campaigns, mentored exonerees, and pushed for reforms to prevent future miscarriages of justice. Her story became emblematic at one level of the Innocence Project’s mission. As she once said, “Justice should be about truth. The truth set me free — and now I try to help others find their freedom too”. Sadly, I believe the Innocence Project has long since lost much of its moral bearing. Sunny became a sought-after speaker, sharing her journey of injustice and redemption around the world. Even after Peter’s death in January 2023, she continued their mission with fierce determination. Sunny’s passion for justice led to the creation of the foundation that bears here name, The Sunny Center, a non-profit organisation dedicated to helping those who have endured wrongful conviction Sunny is survived by her two children, who were separated from her during her incarceration. Her life stands as a testament to the human capacity for resilience, forgiveness, and the relentless pursuit of truth. In her own words: “I had a choice to believe either in hope or hopelessness. And so, I chose to believe in hope rather than hopelessness. That one instant changed everything for me.” She was a wonderful gentle spirit: a child of a more spiritual and finer age. Devoid of malice and hatred. I do not know what happened, but I am very glad that we in Ireland gave her a refuge of comfort and even joy in her last years.