Oisín Quinn

Random entry RSS

  • Posted in:

    Villager September-October ’12 including threats to whistleblower, Sugarman

    Cover-up Jonathan Sugarman, a former Risk Manager, blew the  whistle on his then employer Unicredit Bank,  Italy’s biggest, which  in 2007 failed dramatically to maintain proper liquidity ratios – which keep banks from customer runs on their funds.  Village was the first to name Unicredit, despite threats from McCann FitzGerald solicitors that Unicredit would sue if implicated. Subsequently the Central Bank Financial Regulator’s Department,  announced that it would consider any information offered about the affair “in confidence” but when Sugarman contacted them they revealed that in fact they reserved the right to report him to the Gardai for criminal activity if he offered the Central Bank information that implicated him.  In the  end – in February – Sugarman bravely nevertheless met the Central Bank, which indicated that they had already asked Unicredit to recreate reports dating back to the alleged breaches in 2007 but gave no information as to how their investigations were proceeding.  Subsequently the Central Bank indicated, with no reasoning, that it was closing the file – and notably failed to produce minutes.  When the Irish Independent’s intrepid Mark Keenan recently started sniffing about the issue, the Central Bank finally sent minutes of the meeting,  It is not clear if the file remains closed, or why, and the Central Bank, for the moment is keeping schtum. Hogan’s magic touch So water charges will not become fully operational until 2016, at the earliest. Coincidentally, a general election will be held before that date. Big Phil Hogan who has gone politically AWOL after presiding over the household charge and septic-tank fiascos, is now applying his monkey-repairing-a-television-set nous to domestic water metering. Bord Gáis has been awarded the contract for running the system. Expect to hear very little until the last minute, and certainly no justifications for any new unpopular taxes from this, the State’s least ideological Minister ever.   Going Nowhere Reflecting the general stasis, it is remarkable how small the fluctuations in the numbers of unemployed are. Even anecdotally there is little talk of hordes heading to Nirvanas in the New World. A beleaguered domestic population has resigned itself to pestilence and reality TV. Numbers on the register have fallen only marginally, from 440,300 in January to the current level of 434,400. In 2012 the unemployment rate has moved between the very narrow band between 14.7% and 14.8%.   Letterkenny coming to the Home Counties With the Cabinet reshuffled to incorporate even more Oxbridge Tories and Northern Ireland secretary Owen Paterson installed as Minister for the Environment it is interesting that Britain’s Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne has signalled plans for a major deregulation of planning laws, raising the prospect of allowing more development of England’s 6,000 sq miles of green belt land. He wants to see more “imaginative” thinking by planning authorities and, in thinking redolent of swan- and snail-hating Bertie Ahern, will ‘fast-track’ whatever it takes by October. Ireland doesn’t really bother with green belts, so no lessons there for us, anyway. Osborne also refused to rule out the option of building a third runway at Heathrow, saying “all options” were being considered. This has annoyed Zac Goldsmith, the toffee Tories environmental conscience and Boris Johnson, not to say the Lib Dems (remember them), who note the expansion was foresworn in the coalition’s manifesto. Clegg should dial up the blower to John Gormley for a pep talk.   Socialists panic over Indo onslaught The implosion of the Socialist Party over Clare Daly’s support for Mick Wallace can only be rated as a victory for those behind the Irish Independent’s vitriolic campaign against the financially troubled property developer turned TD. At the height of the controversy earlier this summer surrounding Wallace’s outstanding debts to the Revenue the Indo bizarrely ran the Wexford TD’s problems across its front page every day for two consecutive weeks. As many of the remaining Socialist Party and ULA deputies ran for cover the heat came on Daly for standing by, and in the Dáil continuing to sit with, the embattled Wallace, who apologised for his unquestionably unacceptable dealings with the Revenue Commissioners and offered to pay them half his salary. For some in the Socialist Party turning on Daly provided a long awaited opportunity to cut the Dublin North representative down to size particularly in light of her strong media and Dáil performances since elected as their second TD. Those who relented in the face of the campaign by the Independent News and Media titles against Wallace did not seem to notice the irony of a media group attacking a politician over his revenue problems when its tax exiled owners have been evading their responsibilities on multiples of the amounts owed by the Wexford TD for decades.   Click Villager has replaced his plastic-framed Athena poster of Brad and Angela, ‘Brangelina’ with one of Clare and Mick. Click?   Lie or just bluff? Day one: Mitt Romney, man of action, will “declare China a currency manipulator, allowing me to put tariffs on products where they are stealing American jobs unfairly” . Futurology does not record what the reaction of China will be, nor on what day. But Villager notes that China is the biggest foreign buyer of US debt securities. If it decides not to participate in the next Treasury auction, desperate recourse to the financial markets will be required, sending interest rates soaring and, most importantly, polls dipping.   GM What? No-one in Ireland cares about Genetically-Modified food and how they may spawn irrepressible super-species. Teagasc (whatever that is) was recently granted permission by the Environmental Protection Agency to grow GM spuds and they’ve apparently now been planted at Oak Park. Minister Phil Hogan can instruct Teagasc in writing to do, or undo, anything he wants, so ultimately the decision falls on his desk. Meanwhile, twelve applications were made in the High Court recently for NPE (Not Prohibitively Expensive) Orders by EU citizens, invoking the only-recently-ratified EU Aarhus Convention. The NPE Orders sought protection from risk of exorbitant expenses in

    Loading

    Read more

  • Posted in:

    Village editor on Irish Times’ misreporting of SIPO’s Cllr Oisin Quinn ethics case

    Interesting to see how the Irish Times, the newspaper of record, handles challenging and sensitive stories concerning the political establishment – when you know what the real story is. Here’s an article from a December edition: Councillor’s property stake and vote to be investigated MARY MINIHAN, writing in the Irish Times THE STANDARDS in Public Office Commission is to investigate alleged contraventions of the ethical framework for the local government service by Labour Dublin city councillor Oisín Quinn. The complaint against Mr Quinn relates to his participation in votes on the draft Dublin City Council’s development plan while he had an interest in a property in the city. The property, which Mr Quinn has declared in his annual declaration of interests, is 84-93 Lower Mount Street, the majority of which is occupied by the Revenue Commissioners. Mr Quinn continues to have a one-sixth interest in the property. A public sitting of the commission will be held next Monday to investigate the complaint submitted by Michael Smith, editor of Village magazine and formerly of An Taisce, and Independent councillor Cieran Perry. They wrote to the commission on November 23rd, 2010. According to the commission, the investigation will take place under the Ethics in Public Office Acts 1995 and 2001 (the Ethics Acts) and part 15 of the Local Government Act 2001. Mr Quinn said the same complaint had previously been made to the council’s ethics registrar and had been rejected. “I believe I behaved with exemplary care and transparency,” Mr Quinn, a nephew of Minister for Education Ruairí Quinn, said. “I believe I followed not just the letter but also the spirit of the ethical framework. I took advice by asking the city manager, senior city planners and the city law agent for their view and, importantly, I followed their advice and did it transparently by putting it on the record at the start of the meeting.” The complaint from Mr Smith and Mr Perry states Mr Quinn had an interest in the “substantial and valuable” property and acknowledges that he has disclosed this to the council in writing as required. The complainants argue that Mr Quinn should have refrained from voting on matters relating to the development plan. They argue that he breached the ethics provisions of the Local Government Act 2001 and the associated code of conduct for councillors on a number of grounds, one of which was “through his speaking persuasively to, and voting for, other resolutions in . . . July 2010 which would have allowed increases in heights across the inner city including for his own property on Lower Mount Street”. The complaint continues: “His disclosure before the 2010 meeting was not accompanied by his leaving the chamber and refraining from voting.” The council’s ethics registrar previously told Mr Smith and Mr Perry: “I am satisfied that there has been no breach of the ethics framework contained in the Local Government Act 2001 and the code of conduct for councillors.” Here are the problems, as I see it: 1) Mary Minihan uses comments from only one side of the story. I would have been unwilling to give her a quote, as there is a quasi-judicial hearing imminent and it is unedifying, and inappropriate and unfair (at least while Oisín Quinn remained silent) for us as complainants to comment. I wonder what guidelines the Irish Times has on this. 2) The article not only uses comments from only one side, it is also one-sided in outlining the respective cases. It is unbalanced and it makes multiple mistakes all of which, not uncoincidentally, are to our detriment, not Cllr Quinn’s. For example: A) Balance a) the article tendentiously quotes six of Oisín Quinn’s arguments and only three of ours, one of which is essentially a repeat though an inaccurate one and b) it suggestively finishes up with a quote from an apparently independent source supporting the first (key?) argument Oisín Quinn makes in the article. B) Inaccuracies in reporting central details of our case a) Mary Minihan does not state our best case, part of which is that Cllr Quinn improperly proposed changes in height in ‘Dublin 2 minus the Georgian area’ – a far smaller area than the ‘inner city’ and therefore far more blatantly to his financial advancement and b) she comprehensively mis-states our case – we did not argue that he ‘should not have voted on matters relating to the development plan’ merely on height standards that affected his property (I’m going to ask the Irish Times to correct this – we’ll see how I get on [see below]); C) Inaccuracies in reporting central thrust of our case Mary Minihan entirely fails to understand our case which is that if you make a declaration you (obviously!) withdraw: there are no brownie points under ethics legislation for declaring a relevant interest and then voting – it’s quite simple; D) Apparent unawareness of current status of complaint Finally, she emphasises not just once but twice the hasty, and obviously not independent, view of the ‘ethics registrar’ who works as a senior official in the local authority whose officials had advised Oisín Quinn to make a declaration and then stay to vote. She never mentions that SIPO, which looked at the ethics registrar’s opinion, considered our complaint for over a year, delegated an inspector to follow up the complaint and then took an official decision to pursue it. Cieran Perry and I will probably take no further role in this case. The essential case we made will now be presented on behalf of SIPO by its senior counsel, not by us. This matter is more relevant than the matter she mentions twice, regarding the current status of our complaint. You’d think from her article that our case could be borderline frivolous or vexatious. In short, Mary Minihan quotes comments from Cllr Quinn but not from us, quotes twice as many arguments for his case as for ours, does not state our best case, mis-states the rest of

    Loading

    Read more